Peak Oil News

 

 
Menu
 News
 Search
 Topics
 Stories Archive
 Submit News
 Discussions
 Code of Conduct
 Forums
 Last 24 Hours
 PO 24hrs
 Peak Blog
 Ask Jane
 Resources
 About Us
 Downloads
 Web Links
 PeakWiki
 PeakPortal
 Focus Search
 Peak TV
 Peak Oil Boston
 Follow on Twitter
 Members
 User Panel
 Members List
 PO Team
 JOIN!
 Private Messages
 
PeakSpeak
NICKNAME

Download TeamSpeak
What is PeakSpeak?
Peak Oil on IRC
 
Member Quotes
Abiotic oil debunking is a regular thing around here. New members who have not done their homework bring it up as a solution to the worlds problems. Posting a reply uses more energy than will ever be generated by such a thing.

kpeavey

Suggest Quote

 
Photo Album
Submit Photo
Peakoil.com is You!


member photos
 
Links

Net App Training
Aaron
 
Why Oil Really Fell Today—and Could Keep Falling
Hydrocarbon AlternativesOil slipped below $120 at one point today and now overall is down nearly 20 percent from its July high of near $150. But I don't think the drop had much to do with the usual suspects—a weak consumer spending report, less risk that Tropical Storm Edouard will smack the Gulf Coast—which will surely be mentioned in the financial pages tomorrow.

I think the drop had everything to do with reports this weekend that MIT chemist Daniel Nocera seems to have discovered a cheap—by a factor of 1,000—and easy way to separate hydrogen from water.

Apparently Nocera believes that this technology could become widespread within a decade. Check this out: "In a future hydrogen economy, he imagines, a house would function much like a leaf does, using the sun to power household electricity and to break down water into fuel—a sort of artificial photosynthesis."

Bottom line: I think research into alternative energy technology is moving ahead way faster than the Washington politicians realize. (But we still need to exploit oil and coal and nuclear to bridge the gap from a hydrocarbon to post-hydrocarbon economy.) And it is all happening without spending trillions of dollars in taxpayer money for energy-themed Manhattan Projects or Apollo programs.

US News

Posted on Tuesday, August 05 @ 03:30:26 PDT by waegari
 
Related Links
· More about Hydrocarbon Alternatives
· News by waegari


Most read story about Hydrocarbon Alternatives:
You can close the site now, energy problems are solved.

 
Article Rating
Average Score: 2
Votes: 13


Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad

 
Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly

 
Associated Topics

Consumption; Demand; Prices

"Why Oil Really Fell Today—and Could Keep Falling" | Login/Create an Account | 5 comments | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: Why Oil Really Fell Today—and Could Keep Falling (Score: 1)
by RSFB on Tuesday, August 05 @ 06:21:56 PDT
(User Info )
Karsten Meyer, a professor of chemistry at Friedrich Alexander University [en.wikipedia.org], in Germany said that for solar power, "this is probably the most important single discovery of the century."[2]

James Barber, a
biochemistry professor at Imperial College London who studies
artificial photosynthesis but was not involved in this research, called
the discovery by Nocera and Kanan a "giant leap" toward generating
clean, carbon-free energy on a massive scale.
"This is a major discovery with enormous implications for the future
prosperity of humankind," he said. "The importance of their discovery
cannot be overstated."



Re: Why Oil Really Fell Today—and Could Keep Falling (Score: 1)
by Heineken on Tuesday, August 05 @ 07:47:14 PDT
(User Info ) http://peakoil.com
I bet we never hear about this amazing, "seems to have discovered" discovery again.
That's the pattern.



Re: Why Oil Really Fell Today—and Could Keep Falling (Score: 1)
by FoxV on Tuesday, August 05 @ 09:10:07 PDT
(User Info )
This is a pretty spacious commentary on the original Scientific America article (linked in the "report" above)

The only thing that has been reduced in cost is the Catalyst used to separate water. Which over the lifetime of an electrolysis system is a small cost factor (even with platinum at $1700/oz) compared to the electricity that has to be pumped into it.

This has done nothing to improve the overall thermodynamics problem with the Hydrogen economy
Water to Hydrogen = 50% energy loss
Hydrogen to EV motion = 50% energy loss
Hydrogen Economy = Rabbit starvation