| Author |
Message |
 Topic: stations CHOOSING to not sell gas |
Joe0Bloggs
Replies: 32
Views: 3752
|
 Forum: Current Events Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 9:56 pm Subject: Re: stations CHOOSING to not sell gas |
Why anyone would accept credit card payment under such terms is beyond me.
Plenty of examples of cash discounts and credit card premiums here. |
| Topic: Oil Alternatives Aren't |
Joe0Bloggs
Replies: 118
Views: 17986
|
Forum: Energy Technology Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 7:49 pm Subject: Re: Oil Alternatives Aren't |
http://www.peakoil.com/images/Research.jpg
http://img158.imageshack.us/img158/9003/sega02at6.jpg |
| Topic: Uranium Supply |
Joe0Bloggs
Replies: 1377
Views: 139757
|
Forum: Energy Technology Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 6:51 pm Subject: Re: Uranium Supply |
Uranium may more than double to $250 a pound next year as demand for the nuclear fuel outpaces production, according to SXR Uranium One Inc.
SXR will become the world's second- largest producer o ... |
| Topic: Oil Alternatives Aren't |
Joe0Bloggs
Replies: 118
Views: 17986
|
Forum: Energy Technology Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 7:53 pm Subject: Re: Oil Alternatives Aren't |
LOL you're right, he wins 
Praise be to DOOM!! |
| Topic: Oil Alternatives Aren't |
Joe0Bloggs
Replies: 118
Views: 17986
|
Forum: Energy Technology Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 7:06 pm Subject: Re: Oil Alternatives Aren't |
Aaron seemed to concede.
Christ dude... I'm publicly embarrassing you.
Show some spine...
This has got to be the worst argument ever.
It would be unethical for me to continue thrashing yo ... |
| Topic: Oil Alternatives Aren't |
Joe0Bloggs
Replies: 118
Views: 17986
|
Forum: Energy Technology Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 6:49 pm Subject: Re: Oil Alternatives Aren't |
Proper trolling requires a lighter touch guy. Instead of saying stupid crap like "energy prices have little effect on the economy"
Nope, nobody bothers reading anything before they post. Where ... |
| Topic: Oil Alternatives Aren't |
Joe0Bloggs
Replies: 118
Views: 17986
|
Forum: Energy Technology Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 11:29 pm Subject: Re: Oil Alternatives Aren't |
Oh, I think my very prominent threads related to this are easy enough to find.
Hmm, other people can quote sources and make coherent arguments, but as a privilege of having posted 9000+, you th ... |
| Topic: Oil Alternatives Aren't |
Joe0Bloggs
Replies: 118
Views: 17986
|
Forum: Energy Technology Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 10:37 pm Subject: Re: Oil Alternatives Aren't |
| Isn't it enough to prove that alternatives are inferior to oil... by proving alternatives are inferior to oil? You know, by directly calculating their EROEI? Why must you and Aaron resort to invalid e ... |
| Topic: Oil Alternatives Aren't |
Joe0Bloggs
Replies: 118
Views: 17986
|
Forum: Energy Technology Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 10:30 pm Subject: Re: Oil Alternatives Aren't |
I doubt you need to rehash 9000 posts to point out why rising oil prices IN AND OF ITSELF means that alternative energy sources are inferior, when there are explicit counterexamples in history.
Act ... |
| Topic: Oil Alternatives Aren't |
Joe0Bloggs
Replies: 118
Views: 17986
|
Forum: Energy Technology Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 10:27 pm Subject: Re: Oil Alternatives Aren't |
Simply put:
1. If prices indicate EROEI, then PO->doom is true.
2. PO->doom is true.
3. Then prices must indicate EROEI.
Heck no!
1. If prices indicate EROEI, then PO->doom is true.
... |
| Topic: Oil Alternatives Aren't |
Joe0Bloggs
Replies: 118
Views: 17986
|
Forum: Energy Technology Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 10:11 pm Subject: Re: Oil Alternatives Aren't |
I doubt you'd see that Britain had scaled up its coal usage 10 to 20 years before Peak Wood...
Another embarassing quote....
Care to elaborate?
It would lower the price of the energy you s ... |
| Topic: Oil Alternatives Aren't |
Joe0Bloggs
Replies: 118
Views: 17986
|
Forum: Energy Technology Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 9:21 pm Subject: Re: Oil Alternatives Aren't |
Wohoo! I'm featured in Member Quotes! To whom do I owe this honor?
Honor?
You mean embarrassment, don't you? 
Sure, if you insist on taking the quote out of context...
It mak ... |
| Topic: Fission FAQ v 1.5 |
Joe0Bloggs
Replies: 44
Views: 14031
|
Forum: Energy Technology Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 8:39 pm Subject: Once-through total-use nuclear cycle possible? |
| So, breeders convert more fertile material into fuel than the fuel it consumes, but the reprocessing is expensive. Why is it that the fuel has to be taken out for reprocessing at all? Why can't the ne ... |
| Topic: Oil Alternatives Aren't |
Joe0Bloggs
Replies: 118
Views: 17986
|
Forum: Energy Technology Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 8:32 pm Subject: Re: Oil Alternatives Aren't |
| Wohoo! I'm featured in Member Quotes! To whom do I owe this honor? |
| Topic: Uranium Supply |
Joe0Bloggs
Replies: 1377
Views: 139757
|
Forum: Energy Technology Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 7:47 pm Subject: Re: Uranium Supply |
| BTW, if nuclear power is in as much trouble as you say, shouldn't it be the coal power company buying the nuke company and not the other way around? |
| |
News
Discussions
Resources
Members
Forum FAQ
Search
Usergroups
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
