| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ohanian Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Oct 17, 2004 Posts: 1062
|
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2004 2:48 am Post subject: Peak OIL date: Apr-May 2005 |
|
|
All,
Here is my bold prediction on the date of peak oil.
April - May 2005
Here is how I arrived at that date.
* Estimate of slack is 1%
* Estimate of depletion rate is 4400 barrel per day per day
* Daily extraction rate is 82 million barrel per day
82*10^6 barrels per day * 0.01 = 820,000 barrels per day (SLACK)
This will be completely depleted at
820,000 / 4400 = 186 days
= 6.2 months
Today is 18th October 2004 THUS in 6 months time it would be
April - May 2005 where SLACK is zero. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rembrandt Tar Sands


Joined: Aug 21, 2004 Posts: 59
|
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2004 4:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't really get what you are saying.
what do you mean by slack?
You are calculating the peak as far as i get it by an estimate of when an amount of barrels have been extracted then the peak will hit.
Depletion of 4400 barrels per day until peak that is?
besides that the 82 million barrel figure isn't static although in such a "short" timespan it can be used in that way.
I hope you can clarify these things for me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
![]()
|
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2004 5:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
ohanian
Carry in living in fantasyland.. meanwhile I'll keep burning oil. Then in 20 yrs time I'll come and drive my SUV over to your hideaway in the hills and remind you of these calculation...
JD |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ohanian Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Oct 17, 2004 Posts: 1062
|
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2004 6:01 am Post subject: What is slack? |
|
|
Question: What is slack?
Answer:
slack (adjective)
1. Not pulled tight
2. Not busy
3. Not working hard
In this case, slack is another word for spare capacity. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
clv101 Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Jun 02, 2004 Posts: 1078 Location: Bristol, UK
|
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2004 6:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ohanian, your 'model' does not take into account the currently declining production from some major regions, nor does it take into account the increasing production from some other regions. Without these two rates your analysis is worthless. I also don't know where you get your 1% slack figure from – there is no reason for any producer to be sitting on any spare capacity right now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tmazanec1 Heavy Crude


Joined: Oct 12, 2004 Posts: 424
|
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Well, he might be better than Gary North's "July 2, 2006" (although to be fair it was really "halfwat through 2006") or that guy who said Thanksgiving Day 2005. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
slick50 Tar Sands


Joined: May 05, 2004 Posts: 85
|
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ohanian, I agree with your assesment, and so does T.Boone Pickens and Deffeyes. That fellow who still thinks he will be driving an SUV in 20 years has another thing coming. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Soft_Landing Heavy Crude


Joined: May 28, 2004 Posts: 377
|
Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2004 7:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Although some find enjoyment in locating an exact date, may I suggest that it's not really that important? We probably wont recognise a peak until several years after it occurs, if history is any judge. Further, there will likely be plenty of 'proximate causes' along the peak plateau that have more to do with the actual date of peak than any comparitive rate extrapolation or anything like that.
May I suggest that a more proactive exercise might be to learn about the issues and challenges set to arise, and that it might be prudent to leave the forecasting to the experts?
http://www.peakoil.net/iwood2003/paper/CampbellPaper.doc
http://www.csis.org/energy/040908_presentation.pdf
http://globalpublicmedia.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ohanian Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Oct 17, 2004 Posts: 1062
|
Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2004 6:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Actually there are two dates.
1) Date which extraction capability has peak. IE: unable to extract greater "barrels per day" even if the extractors wanted to.
2) Date which demand of oil has exceeded the supply of oil. IE. perhaps demand in that period grew faster than the increase of extraction rate.
On a practical level (2) is more worrying because the price of oil will rise. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
skateari Intermediate Crude


Joined: Sep 26, 2004 Posts: 548
|
Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2004 6:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
April 16th, 2005 is the date of peak.
I used all the information ever know to produce this figure. yall better get preparing because you have 189 days and counting...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rembrandt Tar Sands


Joined: Aug 21, 2004 Posts: 59
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 4:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ohanian wrote: | Actually there are two dates.
1) Date which extraction capability has peak. IE: unable to extract greater "barrels per day" even if the extractors wanted to.
2) Date which demand of oil has exceeded the supply of oil. IE. perhaps demand in that period grew faster than the increase of extraction rate.
On a practical level (2) is more worrying because the price of oil will rise. |
(1) envelops (2) so you're statement about (2) being more worrying is partially at least untrue.
Besides that you're model is quite linear it does not include: the peak oil plateau (in which supply will be about the same for a long time), the increase of demand, the decrease of demand when demand outstrips supply and many other factors. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ohanian Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Oct 17, 2004 Posts: 1062
|
Posted: Fri Oct 22, 2004 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Rembrandt wrote: | | ohanian wrote: | Actually there are two dates.
1) Date which extraction capability has peak. IE: unable to extract greater "barrels per day" even if the extractors wanted to.
2) Date which demand of oil has exceeded the supply of oil. IE. perhaps demand in that period grew faster than the increase of extraction rate.
On a practical level (2) is more worrying because the price of oil will rise. |
(1) envelops (2) so you're statement about (2) being more worrying is partially at least untrue.
Besides that you're model is quite linear it does not include: the peak oil plateau (in which supply will be about the same for a long time), the increase of demand, the decrease of demand when demand outstrips supply and many other factors. |
During the peak, the gradient of the curve can be approximate by a straight line (linear). I have simplified further by making the assumption that the gradient is constant for the 12 months of the peak (this is WRONG). This assumption makes the calculations easier.
In the end it does not matter, because the peak could depend on other factors which I cannot estimate. But these factor (such as the 2 million barrels per day of IRAQI oil) would merely delay the peak by 18 months, and 18months is a short time in the lifetime of a human life. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zeltum Guest
![]()
|
Posted: Wed Oct 27, 2004 1:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oil may peak in about 50 years, but it won't matter. It won't be the primary resource then. Just like coal isn't now. And I know you crazies on here will all say "there is no alternative to oil etc" but my grandfather keeps telling me how eveyone said that about coal in his day.
Yes society will change, industry, agriculture etc will change. But all that (and more) has changed since his day. Lets face it life is change - and for some people that's scary - hence sites like this. There have always been doom-mongers, and always will. In fact some recently translated persian tablet talks about the end of civilization and mankind, but here we still are.
Go figure. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FusionMaster5000 Coal


Joined: Oct 27, 2004 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Wed Oct 27, 2004 7:06 pm Post subject: It'll be rough - but... |
|
|
In response to the previous post: We are indeed a plucky lot. Sure, we've painted ourselves into a corner at this time, but when push comes to shove, human innovation comes alive. I hope that we're more than a bunch of reindeer on an island...
But only time will tell! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
savethehumans Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Oct 20, 2004 Posts: 1541
|
Posted: Wed Oct 27, 2004 10:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I dunno--I think the Saudis can mask their reserves a few more months, and some new (if much smaller) sites are kicking into production next year. So they may be able to pull the wool over the sheeps'--uh, I mean, the PEOPLE'S--eyes for a teeny tad longer. Deffeyes predicts November 2005. Campbell, I believe, says the plateau will end--and start permanently falling--in 2008. Others still stick to 2010--but fewer than there were at this time last year.
Anyway, if there seems to be a slight "recovery" (i.e. sleight-of-hand?) next year, don't be surprised. I promise--I won't be surprised if the cow patties hit the fan by Valentine's Day! But time is short, regardless....  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|