Peak Oil News

 

  Login or Register
 
Menu
 News
 Search
 Topics
 Stories Archive
 Submit News
 Google po.com
 Discussions
 Code of Conduct
 Forums
 Peak Blog
 Last 24 Hours
 Resources
 About Us
 Downloads
 Web Links
 PeakWiki
 PeakPortal
 Focus Search
 Peak TV
 Peak Gear
 Members
 Your Account
 Members List
 Ignore List
 JOIN!
 Private Messages
 
Sponsors
Forex Reviews
User Comments

Training
Managed Accounts
Forex Broker
 
Member Quotes
Both the worst and the best case scenario are horrible.

Kylon

Suggest Quote

 
PeakSpeak
NICKNAME

Download TeamSpeak
What is PeakSpeak?
Peak Oil on IRC
 
Photo Album
Submit Photo
Peakoil.com is You!


member photos
 
PO Email!
 
Peak Oil News: Forums

Peakoil.com :: View topic - The Future of peakoil.com
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The Future of peakoil.com
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> -Board Kiosk-
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Should PO.com make site policy changes?
Yes
28%
 28%  [ 16 ]
No
48%
 48%  [ 27 ]
Unsure
23%
 23%  [ 13 ]
Total Votes : 56

Author Message
gg3
Expert
Expert


Joined: May 24, 2004
Posts: 3426
Location: California, USA

PostPosted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 2:27 am    Post subject: Re: The Future of peakoil.com Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

And yet another vote for consolidation of threads; same reasons.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MD
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: May 02, 2005
Posts: 2657
Location: looking for space

PostPosted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 4:25 pm    Post subject: Re: The Future of peakoil.com Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

You can have it both ways, and here is how:

Have two classes of threads, tightly moderated, and loosely moderated. The "tight" threads are moderated at the complete discretion of the author. The "loose" threads are moderated under the general guidelines.

The "tight" thread requires some method to allow the authors to edit their threads.

I am not familiar with the limitations of this board structure. Giving thread authors control may require giving moderation status, which would mean the ability to start "tight" threads would be limited to certain posters, because obviously the site can't be handing out moderation controls to just anyone that wants to start a tight thread.

Having authors put through moderation requests for their "tight" threads won't work, the work load will drive the current moderators away.

You could start a second set of "sub moderators", which would be posters that have moderation control, but only use the controls only for moderating specific threads.

There should be a workable solution here that allows free speech to rule while also allowing the "polite engagement" crowd a place to particpate more freely(I do believe we chase quite a few potential posters away over this).

The concept of "tight" and "loose" threads fills the need perfectly, if it can be engineered to work under this existing structure
_________________
Fuel, Fertilizer, and Food.

Welcome to the world of Peak Oil

md@peakoil.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> -Board Kiosk- All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Page 5 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Atom News FeedRSS 1.0 News FeedRSS 2.0 News FeedRSS Forums Feed