Joined: Sep 14, 2004 Posts: 6468 Location: Rural Virginia
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 8:10 pm Post subject: Re: Global warming 'is three times faster than worst predict
eric_b wrote:
Tyler_JC wrote:
Am I the only one who was laughing out loud at the "prediction" of global life extinction because global temperatures increased by 6.4 degrees?
You're a fool.
There'd still be life after a rapid 6-7 degree temperature rise, whether there'd be many mammals left is another question.
Correct. Such an increase would have vastly greater ramifications than just a change in air temperature. _________________ "Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog
"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---Me and my brother
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 2:10 am Post subject: Re: Global warming 'is three times faster than worst predict
Quote:
So is it better to let the planet go to crap, rather than try and solve the problem and risk the planet going to crap?
Well the planet won't go to crap, just us, or at least industrial civilisation. The standard operating procedure should be to ensure the existence of the greatest number of human generations into the future AND the other species. Now you could do that and run an advanced society but not for 6.5 billion people and counting. More probably given the emphasis of ensuring "the existence of the greatest number of human generations into the future AND the other species" this means just a few million at the current rich North American/European standard of living.
Joined: Aug 26, 2005 Posts: 1008 Location: "Mad as Hell !"
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 7:41 am Post subject: Re: Global warming 'is three times faster than worst predict
Think of it as trying to setup a Martian colony on our own planet. _________________ The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: Sep 14, 2004 Posts: 6468 Location: Rural Virginia
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 7:55 am Post subject: Re: Global warming 'is three times faster than worst predict
Given the subject of this thread, maybe more like a Venus colony, Lore. Ha, ha. Good point, though. Every day and in every way, we are relentlessly making the Earth less hospitable to humans. In essence, making it more alien. The irony is that our population continues to rise---for now---fueled by ancient sunlight and a lot of other stored resources that cannot last. _________________ "Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog
"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---Me and my brother
Joined: Sep 14, 2004 Posts: 6468 Location: Rural Virginia
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 8:09 am Post subject: Re: Global warming 'is three times faster than worst predict
EnergyUnlimited wrote:
Omnitir wrote:
So is it better to let the planet go to crap, rather than try and solve the problem and risk the planet going to crap?
It is better to step into crap, than fall down a toilet.
Absolutely. We have to face the music---or, rather, the crap. We have to pay the price, the massive debt to natural capital that we've accumulated. Even if we can adopt a power-down and scale-down approach and start taking care of our Earthly crib, it's going to get a lot uglier before it gets any better.
Pouring billions into techno "fixes" is exactly the wrong approach, since it can't work and thus will only waste time and money we don't have. Technology, by promising painless transitions, in fact sends us down the doomed road of "more of the same."
We have all the technology we need right now. Way more than enough, in fact. We need to sift through it and keep what is rational and good, and throw out the rest. And start tending our garden. _________________ "Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog
"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---Me and my brother
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 1:56 pm Post subject: Re: Global warming 'is three times faster than worst predict
Quote:
Well the planet won't go to crap, just us, or at least industrial civilisation
From what I see around me I think we will disappear.
The current rate of heating is, as far as I know, unprecedented. Infact it's not even close to anything found in paleoclimate records, it's way, way ahead.
Carbon released into the atmosphere isn't going anywhere in a hurry, it could stay up there for centuries\millenia.
That's long enough to set up heating processes that would take hundreds of thousands of years to run their course as they scorch our puny species off the surface.
Don't for one moment think that this can't happen, it can, it has and it will unless some drastic measures are put in place.
Joined: Aug 14, 2005 Posts: 766 Location: Dead civilization walking
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 2:10 pm Post subject: Re: Global warming 'is three times faster than worst predict
That supposed methane eruption 55mya is cause for doomerishness. There is an additional estimate which claims that the amount of carbon in the undersea gas-clathrates is equivalent to that in all the coal, oil and nat gas deposits. If that is even remotely the case, we now have 10-12 teratons of C available. That puts us squarely in the middle of the IPCC's 8-16 TT requirements for their 5-6 deg projections.
WRT ocean circulaton stalling out, I wonder exactly what parts would stall. Where I live, the currents seem to be mainly a function of the Earth's rotation rather than any thermohaline mechanisms. Maybe the currents would stall out in places like the GOM or perhaps the South China Sea or Meditarranean. I suspect all areas of the ocean would not be toxic and unproductive.
WRT H2S, that stuff is supposed to react with water and make H2SO4. Where are the giant reserves of H2S waiting to erupt out of the ocean and asphyxiate coastal regions? Again, where I live, the continental shelf is mainly rocky and steep with not a whole lot of buried sediments compared to say, the GOM so I'm having a bit of difficulty seeing it as anything but a somewhat localized problem.
Joined: Sep 25, 2004 Posts: 4542 Location: Boston, MA
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 2:18 pm Post subject: Re: Global warming 'is three times faster than worst predict
The ocean takes a long time to warm up.
We won't see the effects of global warming on deep sea water temperatures for centuries.
Water surface temperatures are important to note for evaporation and cloud-making purposes. But it is the deep sea water temperatures that need to increase drastically in order to get the world's supply of methane hydrates to bubble up and create fireballs that will "tear across the sky".
Simply increasing the global average air temperature by a few degrees isn't going to gasify the methane hydrate deposits. _________________ "www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Joined: Sep 14, 2004 Posts: 6468 Location: Rural Virginia
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 2:46 pm Post subject: Re: Global warming 'is three times faster than worst predict
Whoa, not so fast, Tyler. A lot of the methane hydrates aren't at the bottom of the ocean. They're locked up in the permafrost, which is now melting.
I wouldn't count too much on your blithe assurances about the oceanic methane, either. Every time we turn around, we learn that events are moving faster than anyone guessed, and in unexpected directions.
One way or another, methane is about to become a huge new contributor to global warming, and it will create a new and deadly feedback loop.
Joined: Aug 26, 2005 Posts: 1008 Location: "Mad as Hell !"
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 3:02 pm Post subject: Re: Global warming 'is three times faster than worst predict
The Big Seep
Quote:
Global warming could lead to release of more methane from seafloor
A warming ocean could release more of the potent greenhouse gas methane in a vicious cycle that leads to more warming, says a new report in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Petroleum and methane seep consistently from small cracks in the seafloor, but a study of ocean sediments near Santa Barbara, Calif., found that during the last two major warming periods, around 11,000 and 15,000 years ago, three times more oil and methane were released than average. The researchers hypothesize that undersea methane ice melt could disturb the seafloor and open new cracks for seepage. "This is a source of methane that we might have assumed in the past was stable," said lead author Tessa Hill. "As it turns out, it's very sensitive to climate change." Hill cautioned that the research should not be extrapolated worldwide, as methane stores in different parts of the ocean might not follow the same pattern. Small consolation, that.
_________________ The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:04 pm Post subject: Re: Global warming 'is three times faster than worst predict
As bad as many recognize the problem to be, I'm not sure we've fully appreciated the importance of the extremely rapid rate of change.
It I were to steadily press my fist against your head so that I pushed it three inches, you would not be harmed in the least. You would have time to adjust. This is what generally happens with earthly climate change.
If the same fist were to push the same distance, but at the speed of a quick punch, it could potentially knock you out. This is the equivalent of what happened in the Permian Triassic "Great Dying": relatively rapid change (by evolutionary standards--some ten thousand years) knocked the living world out, leaving much of compex life extinct.
Now, if I fire my fist at you from a cannon (never mind the pain that would cause me!), then even if it only goes the same three inches into your head, the result is not likely to be pretty. This is essentially the equivalent of what we are doing today.
Timing is everything. In biological systems, as with your head, time to absorb the blow, adapt, evolve, recoil, is everything.
Put another way, people tend to assume that GW is like tapping someone on the forehead with a bullet--we and life can adjust; while in reality, it is more like a point blank shot to the head.
Joined: Sep 14, 2004 Posts: 6468 Location: Rural Virginia
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 7:49 am Post subject: Re: Global warming 'is three times faster than worst predict
A critical point, dohboi. The human perception of time warps the human interpretation of this problem, and of so many others that are sweeping away the living, healthy earth at a pace that is by planetary standards dizzying. _________________ "Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog
"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---Me and my brother
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 7:57 am Post subject: Re: Global warming 'is three times faster than worst predict
dohboi wrote:
Put another way, people tend to assume that GW is like tapping someone on the forehead with a bullet--we and life can adjust; while in reality, it is more like a point blank shot to the head.
In short: "I'm not scared of bullets, I'm scared of speed". Which is completely right.
That is why it's so critical trying to figure out whether we are in for a soft landing or a hard crash. Even if the numerical data of the critical variables (amount of oil and other fossil fuels, temperature, etc) is the same at the end, the hard crash would be so much more painful.
I've always favoured the idea that we will have a soft landing. But I'm afraid it looks less and less soft every time I look at it.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum