| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Ache Heavy Crude


Joined: Apr 23, 2005 Posts: 241
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:41 pm Post subject: Canada's ferocious NAFTA growl |
|
|
Don't mess with Canada!
| Quote: |
Question: Who is the largest supplier of energy resources to the United States?
Answer: Canada.
Canada exports more crude oil to the United States than any other nation, including Saudi Arabia. All of that oil, along with a gusher of natural gas, comes free of any kind of export controls or tariffs, courtesy of NAFTA. In fact, the United States consumes almost 100 percent of Canada's energy exports.
Which undoubtedly puts Canada in the driver's seat should a new president of the United States decide he or she wanted to "renegotiate" NAFTA.
David Emerson, Canada's trade minister, took some pains to remind Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama of U.S. dependence on foreign (Canadian) oil on Thursday, according to a Globe and Mail story a reader kindly forwarded to me.
Americans' privileged access to Canada's massive oil and gas reserves could be disrupted if Washington cancels the NAFTA accord as Democratic presidential candidates threaten, Canadian Trade Minister David Emerson warned yesterday.
"There's no doubt if NAFTA were to be reopened we would want to have our list of priorities," he said.
In other words, if you Yankees think you can wave a magic wand and "renegotiate NAFTA" so as to be more beneficial to Americans at the expense of Canada's interests, think again, because we'd be happy to close off the oil spigot and sell our crude, to, oh, I don't know, China.
Don't mess with Canada!
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RdSnt Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Feb 02, 2005 Posts: 1127 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:52 pm Post subject: Re: Canada's ferocious NAFTA growl |
|
|
Canada is likely going to re-open NAFTA anyways.
Currently our nafta obligations are in direct conflict with our need to cut greenhouse gases (and comply with Kyoto).
Have you noticed that the major oil companies in the tar sands have suggested that there be no new development there for awhile?
If that were to occur there is a good chance it would conflict with nafta.
As peak oil progresses the whole concept of global trade is going out the window, which includes shipping widgets from Mexico to Canada to fit into bigger widgets that we then ship back to Mexico.
To survive the US would be smart to tear up all its international trading agreements and start rebuilding their local manufacturing base. We'll ship you the raw materials but you should be processing them locally. _________________ Gravity is not a force, it is a boundary layer.
Everything is coincident.
Love: the state of suspended anticipation.
To get any appreciable distance from the Earth in
a sensible amount of time, you must lie. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PopeGideon Heavy Crude


Joined: Jan 25, 2008 Posts: 158
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 8:30 pm Post subject: Re: Canada's ferocious NAFTA growl |
|
|
Don't mess with Canada?
Why not? Have they got tanks for the Mounties now?
Canada is America's great natural resource supply to the North. The fact that Canadians happen to live there is immaterial.
Don't mess with Canada?
It's like Calvin saying to Moe - "I've got a lunch and you don't Moe, so you better not mess with me or I won't let you have any of my lunch."
Nafta was horrible for Canada. If there was any doubt that Canada was just another American whore, that residual doubt was removed with the signing of NAFTA, which hugely benefited the United States because it forces Canada to sell Natural Gas and Oil to the U.S.. What it does is give the legal pretext for the invasion when some idiot Canadian premier, or whatever they call the president up there, gets voted in under the premise of "not giving away our natural resources to the U.S.." Whatever goon Prez in the U.S. is in power then holds up Nafta and says, "if you breach your NAFTA obligation, that's a terrorist attack on the U.S.".
Sucks to be Canadian. Not only are you the owners of your own natural resources only in a nominal sense, you also have to deal with the cold and snow. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
timbo Heavy Crude


Joined: May 13, 2006 Posts: 161 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 8:52 pm Post subject: Re: Canada's ferocious NAFTA growl |
|
|
| And Joe Sixpack will be there cheering the Prez on. Fargin' Canucks how dare they stop him from drivin' his SUV. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kingcoal Expert


Joined: Sep 29, 2004 Posts: 2330 Location: Pennsylvania, USA
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 10:54 pm Post subject: Re: Canada's ferocious NAFTA growl |
|
|
| timbo wrote: | | And Joe Sixpack will be there cheering the Prez on. Fargin' Canucks how dare they stop him from drivin' his SUV. |
Actually, there's probably more SUVs and big trucks in Canada per capita, than in the US. _________________ "That's the problem with mercy, kid... It just ain't professional" - Fast Eddie, The Color of Money |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dissident Heavy Crude


Joined: Apr 08, 2006 Posts: 389
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 11:00 pm Post subject: Re: Canada's ferocious NAFTA growl |
|
|
| This is blackmail I tell you. Canada is an unreliable energy supplier throwing its politically motivated weight around trying to intimidate the cute and cuddly US. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FoxV Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Mar 02, 2005 Posts: 1337 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 11:13 pm Post subject: Re: Canada's ferocious NAFTA growl |
|
|
| Quote: | | "There's no doubt if NAFTA were to be reopened we would want to have our list of priorities," he said. |
Yeah, just look at the last time we re-negotiated the Free Trade Agreement with our list of priorities. We Canucks really stuck it to you yanks and created NAFTA
All of this is just more preamble into the North American Union. The really sad part is that both of our two main political parties are going for it with both fists.
For the NAU road map we have
FTA: Mulroney, Conservative
NAFTA: Chretien, Liberal
NASPP: Harper, Conservative
So unless the NDP (socialist party) or the Greens (Environmental party) get in ( ) we're all going to end up part of the Bush's big happy family
 _________________ Angry yet? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cid_Yama Light Sweet Crude


Joined: May 27, 2007 Posts: 1203 Location: The Post Peak Oil Historian
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 11:18 pm Post subject: Re: Canada's ferocious NAFTA growl |
|
|
Haven't you seen Canadian Bacon. Canada has the Hacker Hailstorm! Rue the day the US tries to take on Canada. _________________ In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
- George Orwell |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kristen Heavy Crude


Joined: Jul 17, 2006 Posts: 241
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 12:39 am Post subject: Re: Canada's ferocious NAFTA growl |
|
|
| Well Canada has to be getting something out of it. Perhaps the answer is water. The great lakes account for 20 percent of the world's fresh water supply. The border between the two nations gives the U.s. about 60-70 percent ownership. Water is essential for life. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chesire Heavy Crude


Joined: Jul 13, 2007 Posts: 267
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:27 am Post subject: Re: Canada's ferocious NAFTA growl |
|
|
Operation Icebox  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FairMaiden Heavy Crude


Joined: Aug 11, 2005 Posts: 252 Location: Vancouver, BC
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 1:38 pm Post subject: Re: Canada's ferocious NAFTA growl |
|
|
I have yet to hear about water being an issue here so far.
NAFTA doesn't mean anything at all. Most of our major resource industries have been bought up by US companies. We have even gone as far (if I believed in conspiracies theories - I'd see this as the only rational reason for this)...as to sell off public companies that have reached the point of profitablilty. Most of the major infrastructure was paid for by taxpayers...then when they can actually give some back, they sell to a US company so they can stick us with higher bills instead. Contrary to what anyone says "capitalism" does not exist...anymore than real socialism every did. Like socialism gave power to a small few administrators (instead of the people) - capitalism gives power to a small few corporations. If they make profit, they become rich off our backs. If they don't make profit, they get bailed out by the gov't and get rich off our backs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
timbo Heavy Crude


Joined: May 13, 2006 Posts: 161 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 6:16 pm Post subject: Re: Canada's ferocious NAFTA growl |
|
|
| Kingcoal wrote: | | timbo wrote: | | And Joe Sixpack will be there cheering the Prez on. Fargin' Canucks how dare they stop him from drivin' his SUV. |
Actually, there's probably more SUVs and big trucks in Canada per capita, than in the US. |
Got a suspicion that the difference in total numbers can be considered in terms of orders of magnitude however. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
shortonoil Fission


Joined: Dec 02, 2004 Posts: 2540 Location: VA USA
|
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 9:21 pm Post subject: Re: Canada's ferocious NAFTA growl |
|
|
FairMaiden said:
| Quote: | | Contrary to what anyone says "capitalism" does not exist...anymore than real socialism every did. Like socialism gave power to a small few administrators (instead of the people) - capitalism gives power to a small few corporations. If they make profit, they become rich off our backs. If they don't make profit, they get bailed out by the gov't and get rich off our backs. |
Cheer up - this pseudo capitalism, oligarchy, plutocracy, or what ever you want to call it, may not survive the year. When $700 trillion in derivatives implode, it will be a new reality.
Although, you may like the new reality less than you did the old one! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|