| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Jumper69 Coal


Joined: Nov 24, 2004 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 8:09 am Post subject: THE Miles Per Gallon Thread (merged) |
|
|
Acetone In Fuel Said to Increase Mileage 15-35%
Readily-available chemical added to gas tank in small proportion improves the fuel's ability to vaporize completely by reducing the surface tension that inhibits vaporization of some fuel droplets.
by Louis LaPointe
Adapted by Sterling D. Allan and Mary-Sue Haliburton with LaPointe's permission for Pure Energy Systems News
Acetone (CH3COCH3), also called dimethylketone or propanone, is a product that can be purchased inexpensively in most locations around the world, such as in the common hardware store. Added to the fuel tank in tiny amounts, acetone aids in the vaporization of the gasoline or diesel, increasing fuel efficiency, engine longevity, and performance -- as well as reducing hydrocarbon emissions.
Source |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Petro Heavy Crude


Joined: Oct 14, 2004 Posts: 375
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 8:26 am Post subject: THE Miles Per Gallon Thread |
|
|
seriously...although it would be silly of me to eschew any form of conservation there is something blatantly absent from your post: how much Acetone is produced per annum, let's say in the US. What resource is it derived from; and can we produce enough to support the entire glut of automobiles; how much energy is required to produce and distribute Acetone?
Does the percent of fuel savings - fuel required to produce = net gain? If so what is the adjusted economy? I hate sounding so defeatist, but I personally feel that these types solutions, even if only partial perputate the problem. Just me take with a grain of salt. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Doly Expert


Joined: Dec 03, 2004 Posts: 4035
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 8:44 am Post subject: THE Miles Per Gallon Thread |
|
|
| If it's an effective solution, why hasn't it been used before? Acetone has been around for longer than gasoline. I'm not saying your information is incorrect, but I suspect there must be some catch if it hasn't been used. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pip Intermediate Crude


Joined: Apr 21, 2004 Posts: 508 Location: Republic of Texas
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 9:34 am Post subject: THE Miles Per Gallon Thread |
|
|
I've heard this before. I think it's one of those urban legends. _________________ The road goes on forever and the party never ends - REK |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Taskforce_Unity Heavy Crude


Joined: Nov 22, 2004 Posts: 487 Location: Holland
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 9:51 am Post subject: THE Miles Per Gallon Thread |
|
|
Hmmz sounds not really credible to me, anybody has the time to check this out? I doubt if it will work. Probably some chemist on the forum kan debunk this really quick.
Hasn't Been Warmly Received
Questions asked of someone in the petroleum industry regarding ACETONE will often automatically trigger a string of negative reactions and perhaps false assertions. We may have heard them all. The mere mention of this additive represents such a threat to oil profits that you may get fabricated denials against the successful use of acetone in fuels.
The author has never found any valid reason for not using acetone in gasoline or diesel fuel. Plus it takes such a tiny amount to work. No wonder they fear this additive |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Roy Intermediate Crude


Joined: Jun 18, 2004 Posts: 767 Location: Western North Carolina
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 12:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I received a copy of this story in my emai box.
Being a car guy, I read the article with interest. The assertion makes sense. Not only to myself, but some mechanical engineers and other car guys I've talked to about it.
The premise is that gasoline has an inherent surface tension that inhibits complete vaporization in the combustion chamber. Therefore complete burning of the air/fuel mixture never happens. The author claims that acetone acts an agent to reduce the inherent surface tension, and thereby allow more complete combustion of the air/fuel mixture.
The author also claims that acetone will not degrade components designed to work with gasoline.
As I said, everyone I've talked to was cynical at first until we got into the "nuts and bolts" of it.
I'm no chemist for sure. But I do have an engineering degree and 20+ years of experience working on i/c engines.
I've spent years learing how to maximize the fuel economy of all my vehicles. Many times the most trivial component being optimized can make a noticeable difference in fuel economy.
I'm going to give this a try. I'll report back in a month or so when I have enough data to make a conclusion.
Notwithstanding a reply to this post from a chemical engineer/chemist informing me that its a bunk idea. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pup55 Expert


Joined: May 26, 2004 Posts: 3697
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aahala Intermediate Crude


Joined: Feb 03, 2005 Posts: 954
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 2:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think Louis and Sterling and Mary-Sue may have been adding acetone to
their morning orange juice.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Roy Intermediate Crude


Joined: Jun 18, 2004 Posts: 767 Location: Western North Carolina
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 5:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So pup55,
Are you saying that its a bad idea???
If so, why? I'm interested in your reasoning and/or knowledge base.
Sure, I've seen many a scam automotive product. The Tornado comes to mind. In just about every case of snake oil auto products, they are accompanied with a marketing campaign. I didn't notice that the source of this article was an acetone mfgr. Maybe I missed something. What I read was that these people figured this out on their own. The author claims 1-2 fl oz per 10 gallons in enough to do the trick. (frankly the concept intrigues me)
Since acetone is used in carbuerator cleaners its obviously not harmful to fuel systems per se. The products you linked are very familiar to me.
No one I talked to about this agreed that it would work. Only that it would be worth a try on a "gas hog", like my old truck that I use for occaisional hauling. It gets 11mpg driven conservatively. And it is in near optimal running condition for a vehicle of it's type.
Even a 15% improvement in gas mileage would be well worth the small investment required to try it. If it doesn't work I've lost only a few dollars for the acetone. But I gain a big supply of parts cleaner so its not a total loss.
Seems like a win-win to me.
Roy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pup55 Expert


Joined: May 26, 2004 Posts: 3697
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Are you saying that its a bad idea??? |
Not at all. I think you should actually try it and see what happens.
Acetone is in a lot of the commercial carb cleaners, parts cleaners, etc. as indicated in the link above, so you probably will not have a meltdown or anything, although unless your car is really running crappy in the first place I am skeptical about the 35% improvement.
Also, according to my 53rd edition of the CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, and also memory, acetone is soluble in water, so if you have any water in your gas tank or line this stuff will take care of it.
There is one minor point, which is that acetone will certainly eat hell out of certain kinds of rubber (i.e. fuel lines and gaskets). Also, not at all unheard of for something like this to wash the gik and varnish from the inside of your gas tank and have it collect in your fuel filter. I had an old firebird and that happened to me the first time I used ethanol, back in the 70's. Also, keep it away from your paint. Acetone= nail polish remover.
So I imagine for a test tank or two it is worth a try. Report back and tell us what happened. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antimatter Intermediate Crude


Joined: Jan 04, 2005 Posts: 623 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 11:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If it really made such a difference, lowered emissions etc why wouldn't refineries already be adding it? Hydrocarbons don't have much surface tension anyway. When filling a lawnmower etc you will notice how 'thin' petrol is. Incomplete combustion can usually be seen and smelt in the form of black/brown smoke. If anything it seems to me that acetone being a polar molecule would increase the surface tension.
| Quote: | | Too much acetone will decrease mileage slightly due to adding too much octane to the fuel. Too much also upsets the mixture ratio because acetone (like alcohol) is a light molecule. |
The idea of too high an octance rating decreasing milage is nonsense. It will upset the fuel/air ratio if too much is added, because it is oxygenated (like ethanol), not because it is a light molecule! That being said, it shouldn't do any harm in those quantities, so may as well give it a go! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Roy Intermediate Crude


Joined: Jun 18, 2004 Posts: 767 Location: Western North Carolina
|
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 6:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the comments guys.
I'll give it a go this weekend.
My truck, an 82 Ford F100, actually has a high compression engine in it. The guy who built it told me it would only run on 92+ octane.
I tried half a tank of 89 octane mixed with the 92 in the tank, and voila, instant pinging.
Acetone as an octane boost (2oz per 10 gallons or 4 oz per tank in this truck) should be worth its weight as an octane booster alone.
Gas just went from $1.93 to $1.99 yesterday at the cheapest station in town yesterday.
I'll post the results in a few weeks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pup55 Expert


Joined: May 26, 2004 Posts: 3697
|
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 9:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| We await in suspense for news of the outcome of this experiment! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
EnviroEngr Site Admin


Joined: May 24, 2004 Posts: 1932 Location: Richland Center, Wisconsin
|
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 8:50 pm Post subject: Will it help with fingernails. |
|
|
| pup55 wrote: | | We await in suspense for news of the outcome of this experiment! |
Next long trip, 3 oz. in a tank; will keep track and run the #s.
1990 Ford 1.3L Four Cylinder.
Optimization Graph:
Must be a metered amount. _________________ --------------------------------
| Whose reality is this anyway!? |
--------------------------------
(-------< Temet Nosce >-------)
____________________________ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antimatter Intermediate Crude


Joined: Jan 04, 2005 Posts: 623 Location: Australia
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|