Peak Oil News
Pro4xMentor.com

 

  Login or Register
 
Menu
 News
 Search
 Topics
 Stories Archive
 Submit News
 Discussions
 Code of Conduct
 Forums
 Forums Search
 Last 24 Hours
 PO 24hrs
 Peak Blog
 Resources
 About Us
 Downloads
 Web Links
 PeakWiki
 PeakPortal
 Focus Search
 Peak TV
 Peak Gear
 Members
 Your Account
 Members List
 Ignore List
 JOIN!
 Private Messages
 
Light Sweet Crude Oil
 
google
 
PeakSpeak
NICKNAME

Download TeamSpeak
What is PeakSpeak?
Peak Oil on IRC
 
Member Quotes
We cannot drill our way out of this oil crisis. Since 2000, oil companies working in the U.S. have doubled the number of wells drilled per year.

Although increased drilling has added new oil to the nation's supply, it has not done so fast enough to offset the terminal decline of existing fields.

We are going to have to import more of our oil. Period.

MonteQuest

Suggest Quote

 
Photo Album
Submit Photo
Peakoil.com is You!


member photos
 
Peak Oil News: Forums

Peakoil.com :: View topic - Agriculture Response to Peak Oil
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Agriculture Response to Peak Oil
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Peak Oil Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Pops
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: Apr 03, 2004
Posts: 6343
Location: My Grandkids' Farm

PostPosted: Thu May 08, 2008 2:27 pm    Post subject: Re: Agriculture Response to Peak Oil Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Back in the 19th century there were large farms, hitches of twenty or 30 mules pulled harvesters over wheat fields in the northwest. There is no way to sustain anything near todays population or that of 50 years ago harvesting wheat with a sythe.

My Amish neighbor makes big round bales of hay with a baler pulled by two big Percherons and a little 10hp gas engine that powers the wrapper when the baler stops and the ground-drive can't function. But even that ignores the lessons learned about stockpiling graze for winter - the animals do the harvesting, manure spreading, weeding, etc. - no machinery required.

I guess I both agree and disagree with Heiney and Dude to this extent, the only option is for modern ag to evolve. If it dies outright, then so do we, if it doesn't become more local and less reliant on transport and begin to employ the many lessons learned the last 150 years we may get pretty slim and if it survives in anything like the current mode only through subsidies, rationing or other political action we are simply passing down the pain to our kids.
_________________
Make a plan and work it:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fletch_961
Tar Sands
Tar Sands


Joined: Jan 31, 2008
Posts: 55

PostPosted: Thu May 08, 2008 8:06 pm    Post subject: Re: Agriculture Response to Peak Oil Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Pops wrote:

Here is the situation that lead to the bust of the '80's:
Quote:
By the early 1980’s, many of the factors
that spurred the boom were reversing.
Commodity prices fell, input prices and
interest rates rose, export demand turned
down, and farm income declined. Many
farmers who had bought land or made
other long-term investments—especially
those who used debt financing—now had
difficulty meeting their other financial
obligations or even making a living.






Soviet Grain Embargo


Where is Carter's F'ing grain embargo?
Quote:
I On January 4, 1980, using his most potentially effective response to Soviet military action in Afghanistan, President Carter cancelled contracts for the sale of 17 million metric tons mmt) of U.S. corn, wheat and soybeans to the Soviet Union.

Quote:
the incoming Secretary of Agriculture indicated that food can be used for geo-political purposes. mation hearings on January 5, John R. Block said: In his confir I believe food is now the great weapon we have for keeping peace in the world. It will continue to be so for the next 20 years, as other countries become more dependent on American farm exports and become reluctant to upset us The rising trend in Soviet purchases of U.S. grain over the Such a lever theoretically gives For grain cutoffs to influence four-year period of the grain agreement explains why grain has become a potential bargaining lever for the United States in dealing with the Soviet Union U.S. policymakers the ability to affect Soviet behavior by threat ening cutoffs of grain exports.


Who ever typed that has worse skills than me. The Soviets, its allies, and our allies decided that having the weapon of food hanging over them was to much and responded by making it their policy to raise production.

While the boom-bust cycle was going to happen anyway, it would certainly not have been as drastic if Carter hadn't decided to use US farmers as his personal pawns.

Quote:
"Of all the negative things the U.S. government could do or have done to agriculture, this one has hurt the most, with long-lasting consequences because it meant the U.S. could be an unreliable supplier and it sent the signal to big importers to expand their supply sources and in turn to supplying countries to increase their production."

Those are truly long-term impacts that while hard to quantify have stuck around for years and years. It generated debate about and legislation involving contract sanctity. But it also helped fuel the dramatiac growth in South America's agricultural production.

excerpted from Carter Grain Embargo, AgWeb, Oct 31, 2002


link

So, thanks to Carter, grain production shifted to South America and edible oils (Palm Oil) goes to malyasia---so much for the rain forests. And US surplus goes into ... Pstarr's favorite topic.

Good thing Carter wore a sweater so he could be an environmental hero for nutters.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pops
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: Apr 03, 2004
Posts: 6343
Location: My Grandkids' Farm

PostPosted: Thu May 08, 2008 8:15 pm    Post subject: Re: Agriculture Response to Peak Oil Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

I take your points fletch, but what is your conclusion about the ag response to PO going forward?
_________________
Make a plan and work it:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fletch_961
Tar Sands
Tar Sands


Joined: Jan 31, 2008
Posts: 55

PostPosted: Thu May 08, 2008 8:28 pm    Post subject: Re: Agriculture Response to Peak Oil Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Quote:
I think we are feeling the effects of subsidized ethanol consumption in our food prices but what I fear more is an abrupt cutting of the subsidies .


I forgot to get to my point.

The government should get out of the business of engineering farm policy. Although, I agree with not going with the abrupt removal of farm subsides they should be eliminated. High farm returns only lead to high land prices which then reguire continued high prices to pay back the loans for the high priced loans which requires more subsidies. A dependancy started long ago.

Farmers will be fine...if they are allowed to fail.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fletch_961
Tar Sands
Tar Sands


Joined: Jan 31, 2008
Posts: 55

PostPosted: Thu May 08, 2008 8:43 pm    Post subject: Re: Agriculture Response to Peak Oil Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Pops wrote:
I take your points fletch, but what is your conclusion about the ag response to PO going forward?


I don't think ag has a response to PO. Ethanol has nothing to do with PO. Except in the minds of politicians.

Ethanol is about getting rid of out surplus production as cheaply as possible. How much would it cost the government to get farmers to plant nothing? Add to that the lost tax revenue from monsanto, John Deere, and everyone else who makes a buck when fields get planted. The couple billion in subsidies that goes to ethanol production is cheap in comparison. They more than likely get it most of it back from the income tax they collect from the folks that work at the ethanol plants.

Now, high energy prices come along. Politicians get it in their head to push more of it. Run the price of corn up. Start pissing people off that are used to having their subsidized $2 / bushel corn. So now the government decides to back track a little.

Or something like that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cube
Fission
Fission


Joined: Mar 12, 2005
Posts: 2927

PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2008 2:31 am    Post subject: Re: Agriculture Response to Peak Oil Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

I remember watching a news video where a Thai farmer said:
"I used to grow oranges, but the money wasn't that good so plowed over all my trees and now I'm growing rice!" *insert big grin*

I think the first thing that will happen (if it has not already) is farmers going back to growing the basic necessities for life: rice, wheat, corn. In a PO world there will be less people eating "luxury goods" like strawberries and peaches so you can expect a lot of fruit trees to get plowed over pretty soon! Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ludi
Expert
Expert


Joined: Dec 27, 2004
Posts: 10844
Location: Village of Idiots

PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2008 8:16 am    Post subject: Re: Agriculture Response to Peak Oil Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

cube wrote:
you can expect a lot of fruit trees to get plowed over pretty soon! Smile


Brilliant! Let's exchange a durable perennial planting for an annual monoculture! Yeah!
Mad
_________________
"...powerdown so soft and fluffy you'll think you're living in a pillow..." - jboogy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Heineken
Expert
Expert


Joined: Sep 14, 2004
Posts: 5704
Location: Rural Virginia

PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2008 8:57 am    Post subject: Re: Agriculture Response to Peak Oil Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Actually we have failed to mention two favorable developments in agriculture: (1) the trend toward organic farming and (2) the proliferation of local farmers' markets. Two such markets just got going in my county this year. We need a lot more of the same if there is to be real hope.

I totally disagree with the belief that Big Ag will just get more efficient and that more resources will be channeled its way and away from other economic nodes, in order to prop up Big Ag at any and all costs. Big Ag will make no sense, for example, when the immense chain of fast-food outlets and air-conditioned big-box grocery stores are no longer viable because they can't be maintained, because they can't be kept stocked by the trucking system, because people have lost their jobs or can't afford the fuel to drive to these far-flung sites, and because the roads and bridges are falling apart. Or when the banking system collapses or the government defaults and farmers can't get their loans and subsidies.

The System consists of tightlly interlocked parts and when one part starts malfunctioning this tends to ramify throughout the system.

In any case there will not be enough water in future to support Big Ag. Its consumption of irrigation water is mind-boggling and the water sources are in steady, mathematical decline.

The population will shrink, until it reaches the level that is supportable under the new regime that is going to force itself upon us whether we like it or not. That's Montequest 101.
_________________
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---Me and my brother
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
careinke
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Jan 01, 2007
Posts: 193
Location: Pacific Northwest

PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2008 10:16 am    Post subject: Re: Agriculture Response to Peak Oil Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Our wheat lands in Eastern Oregon use no irrigation. The downside is you can only plant every other year. Takes two years of rain to get enough moisture for one years worth of grain.

Cliff (Start a rEVOLution, grow a garden)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cube
Fission
Fission


Joined: Mar 12, 2005
Posts: 2927

PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2008 10:38 am    Post subject: Re: Agriculture Response to Peak Oil Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Heineken wrote:
...
I totally disagree with the belief that Big Ag will just get more efficient and that more resources will be channeled its way and away from other economic nodes, in order to prop up Big Ag at any and all costs. Big Ag will make no sense,
...
I think it depends on exactly what your definition of "Big Agricultural" is. If you're trying to say there won't be airplanes used as crop dusters in a PO world, you won't get any argument from me. ^_^

However I think there will still be "Big Ag" in the sense that most farmland will be controlled by corporations even if our population crashes in half. I just don't see family farming coming back if that's what you're trying to say. There will still be "Big Ag", it just won't be as big as now. The more expensive food gets, the more valuable that farmland will be, the tighter the grip corporations will want to put on their valuable assets. They won't be giving up that land!

my theory
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pops
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: Apr 03, 2004
Posts: 6343
Location: My Grandkids' Farm

PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2008 11:18 am    Post subject: Re: Agriculture Response to Peak Oil Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

One thing I saw growing up in the Central Valley of CA was not just increasing specialization by each operator but the change to increasing specialization regionally.

When I was young, there was a huge variety of fruit and vegetables to supply the many canneries and there were poultry, dairy and beef operations all cheek by jowl.

Fast, cheap, refrigerated transport from virtually anywhere in the world and just about year-round along with hybrids designed to ship and not necessarily eat, put an end to most of the canneries except tomatoes. The egg and poultry operations moved to the foothills where land was cheap and they could spread out and build huge houses. Small milk bottlers and creameries and cheese factories merged into ever larger and distant plants.

Gradually each soil type and climate range became more specialized to the crop most suitable to the area. In the area where I grew up, where once you could once see virtually any food you might want growing in a one or 2 mile range, now is almost totally almonds. I think CA, with that county at the center grows more almonds than any other in the world.

I know it is popular to bad mouth Monsanto, ADM and all, but most every part of that particular production chain; from sprayers to shakers to pick-up machines and hullers to haulers to packers are owned by little guys. Mostly all family businesses and each one invested in and dependent on one crop that is shipped all over the world.

Also in my old home town is the largest winery in the world, up the road ten miles, the headquarters of the biggest egg producer west of the Rockies and 20 miles the other way the largest cheese plant under one roof in the US - they make cheese in 55 gallon drums to put in your mac and cheese and on your Taco Bell taco.

So it isn't just mono culture at the farm level that seems the biggest hurdle for change in my mind, it is mono culture at the regional level in those areas with huge investments in infrastructure all geared to one specialty crop with a huge marketing range - worldwide in some cases and few people around who know anything different.




Having said all that, here are some threads about new-old ways, most have lots of good links:

No-till and other conservation tillage

A snip of a snip...
“South-central Pennsylvania vegetable grower Steve Groff is pioneering what he calls "New Generation Cropping Systems," which emphasize no-till transplanting vegetables with a customized Holland transplanter into cover crops killed with a Buffalo rolling stalk chopper.”

Grass Farming
Snip from Gene Logsdon paraphrased...
He talks about the inevitable rise in fossil fuel costs and his and others attempts to achieve animal production without the use of fossil fuel powered equipment. The method is grass farming, which in a nutshell is rotational grazing to slaughter weight of animals on a number of small plots for quick, uniform grazing of the pasture before moving on to the next plot; allowing the first to recover and regrow.

Who Will Be The New Small Farmer?

The new Small Town

Especially the writings of this guy
_________________
Make a plan and work it:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pops
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: Apr 03, 2004
Posts: 6343
Location: My Grandkids' Farm

PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2008 11:21 am    Post subject: Re: Agriculture Response to Peak Oil Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

careinke wrote:
Our wheat lands in Eastern Oregon use no irrigation. The downside is you can only plant every other year. Takes two years of rain to get enough moisture for one years worth of grain.

Cliff (Start a rEVOLution, grow a garden)

Cliff, I can't remember the exact name of the book, something like:
"This Was Wheat Farming" but if you can find it at the library I think you might like it. It is all about dryland farming up there around the turn of the last century.
_________________
Make a plan and work it:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
careinke
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Jan 01, 2007
Posts: 193
Location: Pacific Northwest

PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2008 11:40 am    Post subject: Re: Agriculture Response to Peak Oil Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Thanks Pop I'll check it out. My wife's family was farming down there during that time (and still are). I have seen pictures of the 20 horse teams pulling the harvesters. I guess fire in the fields was their biggest problem.

Cliff (Start a rEVOLution, grow a garden)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pops
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: Apr 03, 2004
Posts: 6343
Location: My Grandkids' Farm

PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2008 12:04 pm    Post subject: Re: Agriculture Response to Peak Oil Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

I think the bumpersticker slogan that corporations own all the farms hides a bigger problem - they control all the distribution channel past the farm gate.

Take hogs again (as they eat so much corn) in MO only three counties allow corporations to own hog farms, granted they raise lots of hogs but the majority I think are raised by contract farms.

There is an up side and a downside here as we move forward.

Today a contract farmer is basically a hired hand who is told what, when, how much and how to operate by the packer; Cargil, Premium or whoever in return for a guaranteed market. The downside of course is the hired hand is also the guy who risks the capital - sort of like the janitor on the hook for the mortgage on the skyscraper.

On the up side though, as we have seen with the construction of all the co-op ethanol plants, given a sufficient market the landowners can make a change.

http://www.ksdk.com/news/news_article.aspx?storyid=81786

http://www.newrules.org/agri/constit.html
_________________
Make a plan and work it:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ludi
Expert
Expert


Joined: Dec 27, 2004
Posts: 10844
Location: Village of Idiots

PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2008 12:21 pm    Post subject: Re: Agriculture Response to Peak Oil Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Pops wrote:
I think the bumpersticker slogan that corporations own all the farms hides a bigger problem - they control all the distribution channel past the farm gate.


That's been a major problem for decades. It was what put many of the small dairy farms out of business around here - no way to get milk hauled to the processors, and not legal to sell it without processing.
_________________
"...powerdown so soft and fluffy you'll think you're living in a pillow..." - jboogy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Peak Oil Discussion All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 2 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Atom News FeedRSS 1.0 News FeedRSS 2.0 News FeedRSS Forums Feed