Peak Oil News
Pro4xMentor.com

 

  Login or Register
 
Menu
 News
 Search
 Topics
 Stories Archive
 Submit News
 Discussions
 Code of Conduct
 Forums
 Forums Search
 Last 24 Hours
 PO 24hrs
 Peak Blog
 Resources
 About Us
 Downloads
 Web Links
 PeakWiki
 PeakPortal
 Focus Search
 Peak TV
 Peak Gear
 Members
 Your Account
 Members List
 Ignore List
 JOIN!
 Private Messages
 
Light Sweet Crude Oil
 
google
 
PeakSpeak
NICKNAME

Download TeamSpeak
What is PeakSpeak?
Peak Oil on IRC
 
Member Quotes
We cannot drill our way out of this oil crisis. Since 2000, oil companies working in the U.S. have doubled the number of wells drilled per year.

Although increased drilling has added new oil to the nation's supply, it has not done so fast enough to offset the terminal decline of existing fields.

We are going to have to import more of our oil. Period.

MonteQuest

Suggest Quote

 
Photo Album
Submit Photo
Peakoil.com is You!


member photos
 
Peak Oil News: Forums

Peakoil.com :: View topic - Senate vote to suspend SPR refilling
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Senate vote to suspend SPR refilling
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Current Energy News
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
UncoveringTruths
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude


Joined: Nov 04, 2004
Posts: 808

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 11:28 am    Post subject: SPR Cutoff Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Quote:
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Senate is directing President Bush to temporarily halt the shipment of thousands of barrels of oil a day to the government's emergency reserve.

Both Democrats and Republicans said such shipments make no sense when oil is costing more than $120 a barrel and could better be used to add supplies to a tight market and possibly lower prices. Senators voted 97-1 Tuesday to suspend the shipments until the end of the year.

Bush has said the 70,000 barrels of oil being diverted to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve is such a small amount that it does not affect energy markets. Many senators disagreed.



Senate approves end to oil reserve shipments
_________________
It's a cold cold world when a man has to pawn his shoes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert


Joined: Apr 09, 2007
Posts: 4718
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 11:35 am    Post subject: Re: SPR Cutoff Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Cutting off new oil to the SPR will reduce the price of gas.

Suspending the 18 cents-per-gallon federal gas tax will not reduce the price of gas.

---------------
--our political leaders in action
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
emersonbiggins
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: Jul 10, 2005
Posts: 4626
Location: Dallas

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 11:38 am    Post subject: Re: SPR Cutoff Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

< 0.1% world production

This should be good for a couple hundred points on the DOW, though. Rolling Eyes
_________________
“I'm completely in favor of the separation of Church and State. My idea is that these two institutions screw us up enough on their own, so both of them together is certain death.” George Carlin

R.I.P.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
UncoveringTruths
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude


Joined: Nov 04, 2004
Posts: 808

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 11:40 am    Post subject: Re: SPR Cutoff Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Plantagenet wrote:
Cutting off new oil to the SPR will reduce the price of gas.

Suspending the 18 cents-per-gallon federal gas tax will not reduce the price of gas.

---------------
--our political leaders in action


How much does 70,000 barrels represent in our consumption? Is it less than .01%?
_________________
It's a cold cold world when a man has to pawn his shoes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Eli
Fusion
Fusion


Joined: Jun 18, 2005
Posts: 3636
Location: In a van down by the river

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 11:42 am    Post subject: Re: SPR Cutoff Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Brilliant reaction to a longterm problem, what a bunch of Fark.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jimmyz
Tar Sands
Tar Sands


Joined: Feb 06, 2005
Posts: 95
Location: north of New Orleans

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 11:42 am    Post subject: Re: SPR Cutoff Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

I'm sure someone else will be happy to by it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
joeltrout
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude


Joined: Sep 19, 2007
Posts: 887
Location: Land of the Tongva tribe

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 11:52 am    Post subject: Re: SPR Cutoff Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

It only makes sense because politicians mainly focus on the here and now because they will probably be out of office when the nation needs the SPR reserves. If they can make people happy now then that is what counts.

I think it is absolutely stupid to stop filling the SPR. You would think high price would help poeple realize that supply is somewhat tight and maybe we should reserve as much supply as possible while we still can.

joeltrout
_________________
ENERGY is the basis of our industrial civilization and sustains our standard of living. It is the foundation stone of our national wealth. A nation starved of energy.....will be a nation of starving people.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert


Joined: Apr 09, 2007
Posts: 4718
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 11:58 am    Post subject: Re: SPR Cutoff Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

"In the short run...we can stop putting oil underground and put some downward pressure on gas prices and oil prices," said Democrat Byron Dorgan, the main sponsor of the proposal. "When the American consumer is being burned at the stake by high gas prices this government ought not be carrying the wood. It's just that simple."

Separately, the Senate rejected a broader Republican energy measure that in addition to stopping oil deliveries to the reserve would have allowed oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and off coastal states where energy exploration is now banned.

-----------
Byron Dorgon thinks he is putting "downward pressure" on gas and oil prices by cutting off the tiny fraction of oil that goes into the SPR......is he really that stupid or does he just not know anything about mathematics and economics?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Shannymara
Semi-retired Admin
Semi-retired Admin


Joined: Oct 04, 2004
Posts: 4690
Location: Oklahoma

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 12:03 pm    Post subject: Re: SPR Cutoff Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Plantagenet wrote:
...is he really that stupid or does he just not know anything about mathematics and economics?

Neither. He made that statement relying on the citizenry consumers to not know anything about mathematics and economics.
_________________
The very existence of flamethrowers proves that some time, somewhere, someone said to themselves, "You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done." - George Carlin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
peasea
Tar Sands
Tar Sands


Joined: Jul 26, 2007
Posts: 48

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 12:06 pm    Post subject: Re: SPR Cutoff Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

......is he really that stupid or does he just not know anything about mathematics and economics?

erm, let me guess now .....

no not stupid but yes to being uneducated

actually do we know if he's a right wing fundie?

that would explain a lot ....

Wink

P.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
IanC
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Posts: 337
Location: Portland Oregon, USA

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 12:06 pm    Post subject: Re: SPR Cutoff Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Agreed. I think they should fill the SPR to the top, then add more tanks and fill those to the top. We'll need that oil in the future for emergencies. I am a little worried though about who will determine what constitutes and emergency and how they will use the SPR to alleviate it. My imagination gets away from me.

-Ian
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert


Joined: Apr 09, 2007
Posts: 4718
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 12:07 pm    Post subject: Re: SPR Cutoff Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

peasea wrote:
......is he really that stupid or does he just not know anything about mathematics and economics?

erm, let me guess now .....

no not stupid but yes to being uneducated

actually do we know if he's a right wing fundie?

that would explain a lot ....

Wink

P.


Actually, Dorgon is a typical liberal democrat.

That explains a lot too. Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert


Joined: Apr 09, 2007
Posts: 4718
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 12:11 pm    Post subject: Re: SPR Cutoff Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

"The Senate voted on Tuesday to suspend oil deliveries to the country's Strategic Petroleum Reserve until crude prices fall below $75 a barrel, repudiating the Bush administration's policy of boosting the stockpile at time of record oil and gasoline prices."

---NY TIMES

----------

Dorgon's bill doesn't just stop filling the SPR now. It would block any additional oil going into the SPR until oil falls to below $75/barrel.

Since oil isn't likely to go below $75 per barrel ever again, Dorgan's bill would mean that the SPR could never legally receive another drop of oil and so would never be filled.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
heroineworshipper
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Jul 14, 2006
Posts: 421
Location: Calif*

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 12:11 pm    Post subject: Re: SPR Cutoff Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Guess they'll fill it with $500 oil.
_________________
People first, then things, then dollars.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert


Joined: Apr 09, 2007
Posts: 4718
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 12:12 pm    Post subject: Re: SPR Cutoff Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

heroineworshipper wrote:
Guess they'll fill it with $500 oil.


Nope.

Dorgon's bill would outlaw putting any more oil into the SPR until the price drops below $75/barrel (i.e. when hell freezes over).

If the Congress doesn't have the guts to keep filling the SPR at $126/barrel oil they aren't very likely to find the courage to reverse their own law and start filling it at $500 or even at $200 oil.


Last edited by Plantagenet on Tue May 13, 2008 12:16 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Current Energy News All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Atom News FeedRSS 1.0 News FeedRSS 2.0 News FeedRSS Forums Feed