Peak Oil News

 

  Login or Register
 
Menu
 News
 Search
 Topics
 Stories Archive
 Submit News
 Discussions
 Code of Conduct
 Forums
 Forums Search
 Last 24 Hours
 PO 24hrs
 Peak Blog
 Resources
 About Us
 Downloads
 Web Links
 PeakWiki
 PeakPortal
 Focus Search
 Peak TV
 Peak Oil Boston
 Members
 Your Account
 Members List
 Ignore List
 JOIN!
 Private Messages
 
Light Sweet Crude Oil
 
google
 
PeakSpeak
NICKNAME

Download TeamSpeak
What is PeakSpeak?
Peak Oil on IRC
 
Member Quotes
How then, do we move backwards? How does a society, with most of the people having no clue of future events, move from being dependent on a vast and intertwined network of goods and services produced by the indigenous people of whereever, to a local resource and renewable energy based society, and do so in the timeframe available (20-30 years using the most liberal extimates, 10-20 with resonable estimates, 5-10 with worst case scenarios), all the while prices on everything increasing, world politics getting more militaristic, governments continuously reducing civil liberties, shortages of goods on the market and weather patterns resembling bad Hollywood movies?

kpeavey

Suggest Quote

 
Photo Album
Submit Photo
Peakoil.com is You!


member photos
 
ICM
Cisco & Net App Training
 
Peak Oil News: Forums

Peakoil.com :: View topic - Question about nuclear waste
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Question about nuclear waste

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Welcome
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
RickTaylor
Tar Sands
Tar Sands


Joined: Apr 05, 2005
Posts: 35

PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2005 11:09 am    Post subject: Question about nuclear waste Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Hello,

I have another question along the lines of the last one I asked. I read an essay by Alan AtKisson in which he said that because nuclear wastes are so poisionous, it was imperative for us to preserve our technological society for thousands of years so that we would be able to contain them.

Is this true? I don't know much about the problems of disposing of radioactive plutonium. Ignoring the NIMBY issues for a moment, are there feasible options for disposing of it in ways that don't require our continuing attention, so that it won't leak out even if we fall back into the stone age? If not, what are the likely consequences?

--Rick Taylor
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RonMN
Fission
Fission


Joined: Mar 18, 2005
Posts: 2564
Location: Minnesota

PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2005 11:20 am    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Sure...they dug a massive hole in the earth in nevada & are burrying it all in there...it's on a major fault line so if/when a big earthquake hits it should be all wide open to the atmosphere & we can all pretend we are the wicked witch of the west

"I'm MELTING...MELTING" Laughing Shocked Crying or Very sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RickTaylor
Tar Sands
Tar Sands


Joined: Apr 05, 2005
Posts: 35

PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2005 4:31 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Hmmmmm. I've found one answer to my question, a definite "maybe."

http://www.monbiot.com/archives/2004/09/07/two-kinds-of-mass-death/

Quote:
And it may no longer be true to say that there is no safe means of disposing of nuclear waste. I have just read a technical report produced by the Finnish nuclear authority Posiva which, to my untrained eye, looks pretty convincing. The spent fuel is set in cast iron, which is then encased in copper and dropped down a borehole. The borehole is filled with saturated bentonite, a kind of clay. Posiva’s metallurgists suggest that under these conditions the copper barrier would be good for at least a million years.(9)


The writer goes on to say that even if it's possible in theory, he's not convinced it will work out that way in practice.

--Rick
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mortifiedpenguin
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Oct 15, 2004
Posts: 119

PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2005 9:39 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

How come we can't just melt the stuff by tossing it back into the reactor? I know, stupid question, but why can't we?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Welcome All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Atom News FeedRSS 1.0 News FeedRSS 2.0 News FeedRSS Forums Feed