Peak Oil News

 

  Login or Register
 
Menu
 News
 Search
 Topics
 Stories Archive
 Submit News
 Discussions
 Code of Conduct
 Forums
 Forums Search
 Last 24 Hours
 PO 24hrs
 Peak Blog
 Resources
 About Us
 Downloads
 Web Links
 PeakWiki
 PeakPortal
 Focus Search
 Peak TV
 Peak Oil Boston
 Members
 Your Account
 Members List
 Ignore List
 JOIN!
 Private Messages
 
Light Sweet Crude Oil
 
google
 
PeakSpeak
NICKNAME

Download TeamSpeak
What is PeakSpeak?
Peak Oil on IRC
 
Member Quotes
Meanwhile, keep watching for shortage reports, because we should start seeing some sneak in this week, if our doom-o-meter is calibrated correctly.

pup55

Suggest Quote

 
Photo Album
Submit Photo
Peakoil.com is You!


member photos
 
ICM
Cisco & Net App Training
 
Peak Oil News: Forums

Peakoil.com :: View topic - Production Forecast with a Population Constraint
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Production Forecast with a Population Constraint

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Depletion Modeling
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
khebab
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 935
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 12:43 pm    Post subject: Production Forecast with a Population Constraint Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

This little exercise is based on the following observation: the oil production per capita per year has been nearly constant since 1983 at about 4.43 barrels/capita/year (see Figure 2).

Question:
What will be the production pattern if we manage to keep up with the polulation growth as long as we can (magenta points on the graph)?


Figure 1


Figure 2

We assume the following:
1- population grow according to UN prediction (Figure 1)
2- we extract enough oil to maintain a constant number of barrel/capita/year to 4.43 up to 2020 (cumulative production= 1564 Gb)
3- a Verhulst curve model with two values for Q-inf: 2461.82 (BP) and 4173 Gb (USGS)

Results:

The fit is performed by non linear fitting:

Code:
qinf= 2461.82 Gb: PO date= 2014.81+/-  0.89 PO value=  31.28+/-   0.52 Gb/year
k=   0.04+/- 0.002 n=   0.25+/-  0.14 t_half= 2007.64+/-  0.67

qinf= 4173 Gb: PO date= 2025.74+/-  1.24 PO value=  33.99+/-   0.54 Gb/year
k=   0.04+/- 0.002 n=   1.78+/-  0.23 t_half= 2033.49+/-  0.80

If Q-inf= 2461.82 Gb, the model cannot keep up and the mid-point is reach toward 2007 and the maximum production date is end of 2014 at 31.28 Gb/year. If we manage to grow our reserve as USGS is predicting the mid-point is 2033 and the PO date is 2025 at 34 Gb (see Figure 3).

Figure 4 shows the projected barrel per capita per year according to the two models. We should go back to the 1965 level in 2020 (Q-inf= 2461 Gb) or 2030 (Q-inf= 4173 Gb).


Figure 3


Figure 4

Data source: BP review 2004, World Population Prospects The 2004 Revision Population Database
_________________
______________________________________
http://GraphOilogy.blogspot.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
turmoil
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: Aug 13, 2004
Posts: 1184
Location: Richmond, VA, Pale Blue Dot

PostPosted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 1:53 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

as someone who enjoys math, and looking at graphs Smile, i really appreciate you posting this.

plus it helps to educate family!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
khebab
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 935
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 2:00 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Thank you! Smile
_________________
______________________________________
http://GraphOilogy.blogspot.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
khebab
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 935
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 3:19 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

I just want to precise that the UN projection used here is the "medium variant", there is also a high and low variant.
_________________
______________________________________
http://GraphOilogy.blogspot.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
LadyRuby
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Jun 13, 2005
Posts: 1206
Location: Western US

PostPosted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 7:46 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

I second that, nice charts!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pup55
Expert
Expert


Joined: May 26, 2004
Posts: 3596

PostPosted: Fri Jun 24, 2005 7:57 am    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

This population-driven consumption curve is really interesting because of the issue of distribution, as it were.

We know that at the moment the US is consuming at a rate of about 24 b/y per capita, so this is 6 times higher than the global average, so this is not going to fly.

You have China consuming at a rate of about 1 b/y per capita, and they have made the political decision to increase this level by having all of their people go out and buy cars. We know that this is not going to fly either.

You have nations like India and Bangladesh, consuming at a rate of less than .5 b/y per capita. Bangladesh is really vulnerable in this, as is Indonesia: lots of people, low consumption, but minimal ability to defend their oil supply. India not in very good shape either, due to its high population. They do have one thing Bangladesh does not have, though (WMD).

You have a nation like Mexico, consuming 8 or so b/y per capita, but with so much poverty that a lot of them are leaving. What happens to them?

All of the above are going to have to deal with reality, as the old saying goes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Depletion Modeling All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Atom News FeedRSS 1.0 News FeedRSS 2.0 News FeedRSS Forums Feed