Pops wrote:Just as textile factories in New England moved the south due to cheaper labor, they eventually moved to Mexico and Asia for the same reason, ain't nothing new, ain't gonna change, everyone wants cheap socks. It's happening in every industry except .gov and I think you might have noticed some people are getting mad about it.
Between union scale (public and contract), OSHA, EIS, EPA and all the rest, nothing is getting done but filling potholes, certainly nothing big like public transit. Funny thing is, I'm "for" all that stuff.
But we're at the point things are starting to fall apart and we can't afford to fix them because we've middle-classed ourselves to near-extinction. If we routinely pay people $25/hr plus benefits to do a job that takes no skills, education or training whatsoever then blithely turn around and say "all we need is a Manhattan Project and 1,000 nuke plants and we'll be all set for for peak fossil fuels", we're fooling ourselves.
To understand why Fort Worth's pension system is such a financial disaster, look at one month's list of recent retirements.
In January, a 53-year-old policeman retired with an annual benefit of $90,312 for life, plus $256,000 in a lump sum payment. Another policeman, 57, got almost $74,000 annually, plus $313,000 in a lump sum. A 54-year-old firefighter got an annual pension of $90,130, plus $178,000 in cash.
With an average age of 50 for the police and 54 for the firemen in this group, they're likely to spend more years in retirement than they worked. An analysis for the City Council, presented in July, projected that the retiring policemen would collect $3.1 million in pension pay.
You don't have to be an actuary to know that this pension plan will end badly. The technical phrase is "trending toward insolvency."
Plantagenet wrote:...Arianna Huffington, the author of the just released book "THIRD WORLD AMERICA" makes the same point as I do----she was interviewed on the PBS newshour tonight and said BOTH the dems and the republicans have done a crappy job when in power----AND although she is on the left, Huffington is at least intellectually honest enough to admit that Obama and the dems are in power now and doing a TERRIBLE job of fixing the economy ---- facts that you and most of the liberals and leftists who post here seem, for some reason, to be unable to admit.
Pops wrote:I'm saying two things mainly, sorry I'm stepping on your toes, correct me where I'm wrong:
#1
Mid class, mid level, mid skilled, mid schooled, mid income jobs are quickly going out the window, they started going with carbon paper, typewriters and rolodexes - it doesn't matter how much we bitch and moan about how unfair it is, they are going just as sure as Uncle Neds profession went.
Pops wrote:#2
We can't afford to repair our infrastructure, which seems to be getting a D- from all reports, I assume, because of the cost. If we can't even put our kids in a real live school building instead of trailers, or simply repair our existing infrastructure, there is no way we can afford to rebuild it for a fossil fuel free future.
Newfie wrote:I do think there is a LOT of miss information about the Davis-Bacon argument and how that relates to 'state' employees. Two very different things. I'm not even gonna try to clear THAT up.
polka wrote:But whatever... It's the workers to blame!
Revi wrote:The only way to survive is to do what they do in the third world. I lived in Guatemala and everything was recycled. Tin cans turned into kerosene lamps, old tires turned into sandals.
We are going to have to take the detritus of industrial society and turn it into something of value.
The cars that are going to be abandoned could be turned into housing. The Hummer for example could make a nice bedroom, and a box truck for a barn.
We are past the point of fixing the old infrastructure.
Time to figure out how to live in this new world.
Turn your minivan into a bus, like they do everywhere else.
Turn your refrigerator into a business. In Guatemala they had beer, choco-bananos and raspberry helados to sell to me right across the street, all from a refrigerator that would be very common in the US.
Learn how to cook beans.
Welcome to the third world. It's not so bad.
Revi wrote:The only way to survive is to do what they do in the third world.
...
Turn your refrigerator into a business. In Guatemala they had beer, choco-bananos and raspberry helados to sell to me right across the street, all from a refrigerator that would be very common in the US.
Learn how to cook beans...
cephalotus wrote:Revi wrote:The only way to survive is to do what they do in the third world.
...
Turn your refrigerator into a business. In Guatemala they had beer, choco-bananos and raspberry helados to sell to me right across the street, all from a refrigerator that would be very common in the US.
Learn how to cook beans...
Imho that's very bad advice.
Besides capital your main advantages in a global world are the already existing infrastructure (built with cheap energy) and the education of your people. You can throw away both advantages within one generation, but why should you do so?
Do you really prefer to live in a 3rd world country?
(ok, there's also the military dominance, but I'm not sure that it will be worth so much in a post peak oil world. It didn't work so well in Iraq and Afganistan)
Return to North America Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests