Like the illusion of Wall Street, with its vast and powerful investment banks, now shuttered, China too is an illusion perpetuated by the Globalists that gave us the 15,000 mile Caesar salad, poisoned cat food and lead based paint on babies' pacifiers. Like the illusion that money would come from thin air to always push housing prices higher, China has spent a generation pursuing its illusion. Pursuing an unattainable dream to be like the West, while 6000 years of its carefully shepherded top soil blows into the sea.
Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2004 1:55 pm Post subject: Carbon Tax - What's it all about
Hi Folks,
First time on this Forum. Looks GREAT !
Anyway I was wandering what all you clever people make of the Carbon Tax. I think it's a MASSIVE topic which doesn't seem to be talked about much, so I was hoping to bring about a discussion!
Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2004 12:05 am Post subject: Re: Carbon Tax - What's it all about
Muddy wrote:
Hi Folks,
First time on this Forum. Looks GREAT !
Anyway I was wandering what all you clever people make of the Carbon Tax. I think it's a MASSIVE topic which doesn't seem to be talked about much, so I was hoping to bring about a discussion!
So who knows what?
Carbon taxes are simply direct payments to government (collection body), based on the carbon content of the fuel being consumed. Given that the primary objective of the abatement policy is to lower carbon dioxide emissions, carbon taxes make sense economically and environmentally because they tax the externality (carbon) directly. Considering peak-oil, a carbon tax may also move us towards otherwise presently uneconomical alternatives and make us use even more hydrocarbons to produce them, i.e, hydrogen.
The Lincoln Plan
Quote:
Climate change is a complex issue, but it can be summarized rather simply: the consensus of science is that global warming is a threat (1); the consensus of economics is that a carbon tax would be a cost-effective remedy (2). A carbon tax is a charge for emitting CO2, the main heat-trapping culprit.
Joined: Jul 25, 2004 Posts: 34 Location: Toronto Canada
Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2004 9:04 am Post subject:
As a Canadian environmentalist, I am grateful that we signed onto the Kyoto protocol.
However, Canada is likely to miss it's target for CO2 reduction, primarily due to the increase emission from our oil and gas production (specially tar sands exploitation) for export to the US.
So I would strongly support a CO2 tax on all oil and gas produced in Canada. The tax should be sufficient to buy CO2 credits equivalent to that produce by the oil/gas production and consumption.
Companies or groups (such as cities) implementing CO2 reduction programs could use their credits to pay the tax (even if they are from countries that do not support Kyoto).
Money collected from this tax should go exclusively toward renewable energy research and development or to buy valid credits from developing countries that reduce their CO2 or increase their forested area.
Joined: Jul 18, 2004 Posts: 198 Location: S. Yorkshire, UK
Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2004 2:59 pm Post subject:
The carbon tax seems a solution elegant in its simplicity. By targetting the cause of climate change it encourages a free market to find and develop new carbon-free energy sources.
The monies collected from the tax could be used for any purpose, but a ring-fenced energy efficiency/research fund would allow most rapid reduction of emissions.
Of course, there's no reason to restrict such a tax to carbon. Figures for 'external costs' are available for a multitude of different energy sources in a variety of different countries. A unified 'external cost' tax on energy may be a fairer system.
See ExternE (A EU funded study into the external cost of energy) for more details.
Joined: Sep 29, 2004 Posts: 2330 Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2004 1:14 pm Post subject:
I agree with a carbon tax and while we’re at it, eliminate the income tax for a consumption tax. The elegance of such systems is that they payer can control his/her tax payment. I can drive my econobox and save tax money while my neighbor with the SUV can decide if it's still worth driving it 100 miles back and forth to work. There's nothing wrong with SUVs. They are great in very rural areas that get a lot of snow. But using them as commuter vehicles on a daily basis is extravagant. I call it the Tony Soprano syndrome.
Recent scientific studies show that CO2, while a greenhouse gas, might not be our major problem. Soot generated from coal, fuel oil and diesel fuel appears to be the major accelerant to global warming. Is there anything in the Kyoto protocol about soot?
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum