Peak Oil News

 

  Login or Register
 
Menu
 News
 Search
 Topics
 Stories Archive
 Submit News
 Discussions
 Code of Conduct
 Forums
 Forums Search
 Last 24 Hours
 PO 24hrs
 Peak Blog
 Resources
 About Us
 Downloads
 Web Links
 PeakWiki
 PeakPortal
 Focus Search
 Peak TV
 Peak Oil Boston
 Members
 Your Account
 Members List
 Ignore List
 JOIN!
 Private Messages
 
google
 
PeakSpeak
NICKNAME

Download TeamSpeak
What is PeakSpeak?
Peak Oil on IRC
 
Photo Album
Submit Photo
Peakoil.com is You!


member photos
 
Light Sweet Crude Oil
 
Member Quotes
I want my mommy!

Buggy

Suggest Quote

 
aspo08
 
ICM
Cisco & Net App Training
 
Peak Oil News: Forums

Peakoil.com :: View topic - Short-term mitigation vs Solutions
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Short-term mitigation vs Solutions

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Psychology
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
wisconsin_cur
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: May 10, 2007
Posts: 2988

PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 2:22 am    Post subject: Short-term mitigation vs Solutions Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

I am forever amazed at out ability to confuse short-term mitigation of a problem with an actual solution. Most recently in the Lake Lanier thread I read:

EnergyUnlimited wrote:
So on Oct 14th 2007, when this thread was started there was 3 months of water left.

Now 4.5 months are gone and we have still 3 months of water left (if not more).

Looks like nothing to worry about Smile


The Smile is an attempt to poke fun at the idea that 4.5 months ago there was three months left according to current dynamics at the time. That those dynamics were changed enough to stave off the problem during the time of the year when the least amount of strain on the system is taken as proof that there is not a problem or, at the very least, that those who think that there is a problem should be shamed into silence.

The same rhetorical act is repeated often and I only blame those who use it, when they use it. It is like mistaking chemo-therapy for a cure to cancer or prozac for a cure to depression.

I have no doubt that there are plenty of short-term steps we can take to postpone the worst effects of peak oil but those mitigations come at a cost. Communities down stream of Lake Lanier are suffering from the reduced rates of flow that, in part, furnished this reprieve. We can avoid die-off here by many tactics of lesser or greater moral foundation, but there will be a cost.

If we confuse short-term mitigation with long-term solutions then we run the risk of never making the hard choices that need to be made in order to find solutions. If we do not come to a solution than mother nature will.
_________________
Nature is complete because it does not serve itself.

The sage places himself after and finds himself before,
Ignores his desire and finds himself content.

He is complete because he does not serve himself. -Lao Tze
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Ludi
NeoMaster
NeoMaster


Joined: Dec 27, 2004
Posts: 12556
Location: zombie horde wonderland

PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 5:27 pm    Post subject: Re: Short-term mitigation vs Solutions Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

What if the mitigation and the solution are found in the same set of practices?
_________________
No original ideas are contained in this post.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Psychology All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Atom News FeedRSS 1.0 News FeedRSS 2.0 News FeedRSS Forums Feed