Peak Oil News

 

  Login or Register
 
Menu
 News
 Search
 Topics
 Stories Archive
 Submit News
 Discussions
 Code of Conduct
 Forums
 Forums Search
 Last 24 Hours
 PO 24hrs
 Peak Blog
 Resources
 About Us
 Downloads
 Web Links
 PeakWiki
 PeakPortal
 Focus Search
 Peak TV
 Peak Oil Boston
 Members
 Your Account
 Members List
 Ignore List
 JOIN!
 Private Messages
 
google
 
PeakSpeak
NICKNAME

Download TeamSpeak
What is PeakSpeak?
Peak Oil on IRC
 
Photo Album
Submit Photo
Peakoil.com is You!


member photos
 
Light Sweet Crude Oil
 
Member Quotes
I want my mommy!

Buggy

Suggest Quote

 
aspo08
 
ICM
Cisco & Net App Training
 
Peak Oil News: Forums

Peakoil.com :: View topic - E85 Made From Garbage Could Cost Less Than $2 a Gallon
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

E85 Made From Garbage Could Cost Less Than $2 a Gallon

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Energy Technology
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dan998
Tar Sands
Tar Sands


Joined: Mar 07, 2005
Posts: 53

PostPosted: Wed May 14, 2008 11:57 pm    Post subject: E85 Made From Garbage Could Cost Less Than $2 a Gallon Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

http://blogs.cars.com/kickingtires/2008/01/2-e85-garbage.html
E85 Made From Garbage Could Cost Less Than $2 a Gallon

Rather than putting your garbage at the curb, you may soon be putting it in your gas tank.

General Motors has purchased an equity stake in Coskata Inc. of Warrenville, Ill., which has come up with a process that uses bacteria to produce E85 ethanol fuel out of garbage, scrap tires, wood chips, and even recycled foam, rubber and plastic in today's junked cars.

While E85 is currently made from food-based sources, GM says non-food-based ethanol can be produced for about $1 a gallon, or about half of what it costs using corn today meaning E85 could be priced under $2 a gallon at the pump.

E85 contains less energy than gas and gets 25-30% lower mileage than regular lead-free gasoline. But at $2 a gallon, the price wipes out the mileage disadvantage while also providing a use for garbage and scrap tires? they could produce fuel to get us to work and back rather then get buried in unsightly landfills.

In fact, GM says, a facility could be set up at the landfill that would both produce the fuel and eliminate the typical garbage-depot eyesore. Or the fuel could be produced from tree scraps at lumber mills in the forest, or using lumber taken from homes destroyed by tornados, hurricanes or floods.

Unlike corn-based ethanol, which requires between three and seven gallons of water to produce one gallon of fuel, Coskata says it only takes one gallon of water to produce one gallon of non-food-based ethanol and the water can be recycled to produce more.

The first pilot plant will begin producing the fuel in the fourth quarter of this year for use in testing vehicles at GM's Proving Grounds in Michigan, and a plant producing up to 100 million gallons of the fuel for retail sale will be operational in 2011.

GM, which announced the deal with Coskata at today's Detroit auto show media days, is holding talks with oil companies to determine which ones will offer the fuel.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gandalf_the_White
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude


Joined: Nov 21, 2007
Posts: 511

PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 12:20 am    Post subject: Re: E85 Made From Garbage Could Cost Less Than $2 a Gallon Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Dan998 wrote:
http://blogs.cars.com/kickingtires/2008/01/2-e85-garbage.html
E85 Made From Garbage Could Cost Less Than $2 a Gallon

Rather than putting your garbage at the curb, you may soon be putting it in your gas tank.

General Motors has purchased an equity stake in Coskata Inc. of Warrenville, Ill., which has come up with a process that uses bacteria to produce E85 ethanol fuel out of garbage, scrap tires, wood chips, and even recycled foam, rubber and plastic in today's junked cars.

While E85 is currently made from food-based sources, GM says non-food-based ethanol can be produced for about $1 a gallon, or about half of what it costs using corn today meaning E85 could be priced under $2 a gallon at the pump.

E85 contains less energy than gas and gets 25-30% lower mileage than regular lead-free gasoline. But at $2 a gallon, the price wipes out the mileage disadvantage while also providing a use for garbage and scrap tires? they could produce fuel to get us to work and back rather then get buried in unsightly landfills.

In fact, GM says, a facility could be set up at the landfill that would both produce the fuel and eliminate the typical garbage-depot eyesore. Or the fuel could be produced from tree scraps at lumber mills in the forest, or using lumber taken from homes destroyed by tornados, hurricanes or floods.

Unlike corn-based ethanol, which requires between three and seven gallons of water to produce one gallon of fuel, Coskata says it only takes one gallon of water to produce one gallon of non-food-based ethanol and the water can be recycled to produce more.

The first pilot plant will begin producing the fuel in the fourth quarter of this year for use in testing vehicles at GM's Proving Grounds in Michigan, and a plant producing up to 100 million gallons of the fuel for retail sale will be operational in 2011.

GM, which announced the deal with Coskata at today's Detroit auto show media days, is holding talks with oil companies to determine which ones will offer the fuel.


At least your article admits the issue, ethanol is 30% less energy rich than gasoline. So then at $2 we are still paying the same amount per joule.

Also what are the byproducts of the process? How scalable is it? Based on what you have said it sounds likes what is left over would be more nasty than garbage, where do we landfill that?

Finally if all of those hurdles are overcome, how quickly can it come online. Could it replace 10% of our domestic gasoline demand in three years? That would be break even.
_________________
I return to you now at the turning of the tide.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Heineken
Expert
Expert


Joined: Sep 14, 2004
Posts: 6468
Location: Rural Virginia

PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 8:19 am    Post subject: Re: E85 Made From Garbage Could Cost Less Than $2 a Gallon Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

You have to figure in how much fossil fuel is consumed in manufacturing the garbage, and its cost.

You can't win.
_________________
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---Me and my brother
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
RSB
Tar Sands
Tar Sands


Joined: May 13, 2008
Posts: 28

PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 8:44 am    Post subject: Re: E85 Made From Garbage Could Cost Less Than $2 a Gallon Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Heineken wrote:
You have to figure in how much fossil fuel is consumed in manufacturing the garbage, and its cost.

You can't win.


I don't think anyone said this would be the solution for everything, just mitigation. Are you saying recycling is not worth it?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cipi604
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Aug 14, 2007
Posts: 247
Location: Montreal Canada

PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 9:26 am    Post subject: Re: E85 Made From Garbage Could Cost Less Than $2 a Gallon Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

It is still worth it , but you lose anyhow.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pstarr
Expert
Expert


Joined: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 7089
Location: Behind the Redwood Curtain

PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 9:43 am    Post subject: Re: E85 Made From Garbage Could Cost Less Than $2 a Gallon Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

One must always remember that when dealing with micro-organisms that they have very constrained metabolisms and specific niches in the environment. Only the complex multicellular organisms that can inhabit diverse niches.

Each feedstock (used mentioned garbage, scrap tires, wood chips, and even recycled foam, rubber and plastic in today's junked cars) has a completely different physical composition, chemical makeup, solubility, density, and may contain diverse substances toxic to a bacteria.

Even if individual bacteria were bred to convert single substances (which is doubtful, as this would be a new earthly life form?) it would be impossible for one organism to deal with all of these diverse feedstocks. The metabolic waste product from one hydrolytic process would be poisonous to another.

So the pre-sorting, pre-processing, process control and management would need to be completely different for each substance. Resulting in a very complex sorting and control system.

Do you really think a bacteria that can digest or convert plastic or rubber would be a safe product to create in this world?

Where is the EROEI analysis? How do we know this hypothetical industrial fermentation process does not use more energy than is contained in the final liquid fuel.
_________________
director ree rah rip ram. sunofabitch godamn. hidey didey christ almighty. rah rah crap wav
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Retsel
Tar Sands
Tar Sands


Joined: Oct 27, 2006
Posts: 24

PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 11:15 am    Post subject: Re: E85 Made From Garbage Could Cost Less Than $2 a Gallon Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

The Coskata process starts with a syngas process, thus the feedstock, whatever it is, is partially combusted to carbon monoxide and hydrogen. Then the Coskata process uses the bugs to react the syngas to ethanol. Thus the bugs only need to concern themselves with reacting two feedsocks, carbon monoxide and hydrogen, to ethanol. The beauty of the process is that it can take any feedstock and react it to ethanol. It is still complicated because each feedstock has a different mix of hydrogen and carbon, so the reactions must be altered to maximize the fuel production.

Retsel
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Energy Technology All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Atom News FeedRSS 1.0 News FeedRSS 2.0 News FeedRSS Forums Feed