Peak Oil News

 

  Login or Register
 
Menu
 News
 Search
 Topics
 Stories Archive
 Submit News
 Discussions
 Code of Conduct
 Forums
 Forums Search
 Last 24 Hours
 PO 24hrs
 Peak Blog
 Resources
 About Us
 Downloads
 Web Links
 PeakWiki
 PeakPortal
 Focus Search
 Peak TV
 Peak Oil Boston
 Members
 Your Account
 Members List
 Ignore List
 JOIN!
 Private Messages
 
google
 
PeakSpeak
NICKNAME

Download TeamSpeak
What is PeakSpeak?
Peak Oil on IRC
 
Photo Album
Submit Photo
Peakoil.com is You!


member photos
 
Light Sweet Crude Oil
 
Member Quotes
The post-peak oil, post-housing bust economy is already driving most crazy, and we won't even get to the food riot stage for maybe two more years.

DantesPeak

Suggest Quote

 
aspo08
 
ICM
Cisco & Net App Training
 
Peak Oil News: Forums

Peakoil.com :: View topic - Car/aircraft that run on water!
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Car/aircraft that run on water!

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Energy Technology
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Graeme
Fission
Fission


Joined: Mar 04, 2005
Posts: 2646
Location: New Zealand

PostPosted: Tue Jul 26, 2005 10:50 pm    Post subject: Car/aircraft that run on water! Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Hydrogen Technology Applications, Inc. based out of Clearwater, Florida has just invented a new device called the H2O Model 1500 Gas Generator. The gas generator runs off water and produces a unique water/hydrogen gas that can be used for welding metal because of it's extreme heat capabilities. This is just the tip of the iceberg though. They also plan on using this very same process to run automobiles and other devices. That's right, a car that can run off water. Check out their website for more details.

http://hytechapps.com/applications/HHOS.htm
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Eli
Fusion
Fusion


Joined: Jun 18, 2005
Posts: 3909
Location: In a van down by the river

PostPosted: Tue Jul 26, 2005 11:07 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

We are saved!

That guy standing next to the water car looks very sharp in his cop shades and members only jacket. I wonder if he is scientify guy? Those guys are real smrt. Razz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Googolplex
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Apr 11, 2005
Posts: 127

PostPosted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 12:50 am    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Looks like another take on the whole "use electrolisys to generate fuel (hydrogen) and store it instead of just charging batteries" idea. Overall, its rather pointless, as it wastes lots of energy. Just a simple charge-and-go electric car sounds like a much better idea, especially if Toshiba's new one minute charge batteries really materialize.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gnm
Expert
Expert


Joined: Jul 08, 2004
Posts: 2655
Location: plundering eco-villages

PostPosted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 1:47 am    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

just another take on the "magic" "browns gas" - which is another way of saying nasty ready to blow co-mingled hydrogen and oxygen... you ought to google on browns gas to see the loads of BS attributed to it...

either they are stupid or they think we are.....

-G
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Brandon
Tar Sands
Tar Sands


Joined: Jun 28, 2005
Posts: 23
Location: Tampa, FL

PostPosted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 9:02 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Googolplex wrote:
Looks like another take on the whole "use electrolisys to generate fuel (hydrogen) and store it instead of just charging batteries" idea. Overall, its rather pointless, as it wastes lots of energy. Just a simple charge-and-go electric car sounds like a much better idea, especially if Toshiba's new one minute charge batteries really materialize.


Yup! I saw the local Fox13 news story on it, and it was just beyond stupid. A friend had by chance recorded it and brought the tape over for me to view.

Exact dialog excerpted from the story:

Reporter: "Denny Klein uses an alternative fuel source once thought impossible. He says people still have trouble believing him when he reveals his liquid fuel-"
Denny Klein: "Water. Take water plus electricity, and we break it down through our very unique electrolysis process."

Umm.. what? First Fox states via editing that the fuel source is water, then in the next sentence, Klein backsteps and says electricity. BWHAHAHAHA!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stupidstuff
Coal
Coal


Joined: May 19, 2008
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Mon May 19, 2008 4:22 pm    Post subject: Re: Car/aircraft that run on water! Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

its funny, seeing how the bashing gets started on an "oil news" website.. again just because there is not a 100% efficency means that it sucks? what is the efficency on oil? i have seen this HH0 product actually working and i can tell you it works better than oxy acetelene. people just dont know how to use it right; But because it is still not 100% efficient means that it should be destroyed and never used.. ever think of helping to preserve our oil resevoirs.. the oil companies will still make the same amount of cash.. but maybe with this new technology we can help concerve the oil resevoirs and help keep oil costs down.. not to mention what all this oil does to the environment..

too many people are single minded.. and things wont change until single minded people are the minority

cant wait to read the replys
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
WatchfulEye
Tar Sands
Tar Sands


Joined: Jun 07, 2007
Posts: 54

PostPosted: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm    Post subject: Re: Car/aircraft that run on water! Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

stupidstuff wrote:
its funny, seeing how the bashing gets started on an "oil news" website.. again just because there is not a 100% efficency means that it sucks? what is the efficency on oil? i have seen this HH0 product actually working and i can tell you it works better than oxy acetelene. people just dont know how to use it right; But because it is still not 100% efficient means that it should be destroyed and never used.. ever think of helping to preserve our oil resevoirs.. the oil companies will still make the same amount of cash.. but maybe with this new technology we can help concerve the oil resevoirs and help keep oil costs down.. not to mention what all this oil does to the environment..


No one is saying that the torch is useless.

Oxy-hydrogen torches (which the HHO device is indistinguishable from) have been around for ages - early devices were available before oxy-acetylene. Normally, cylinders of Hydrogen and oxygen are used, but there are plenty of torches available which generate the hydrogen + oxygen from electrolysis.

When I was at high school, we had exactly this type of electrolytic hydrogen torch for doing fine metal work. If you needed to make a tiny weld or braze, then the oxy-hydrogen (or water torch) was excellent for it. It had a tiny flame, unlike the oxy-acetylene torches which were a lot bigger.

There are a lot of problems with oxy-hydrogen, which is why it is rarely used, except for niche uses (the minimum flame size of hydrogen is much smaller than acetylene, here OH wins). Hydrogen flames have a very low energy density, and the majority of the heat is carried off as steam. However, the flame also has an exceedingly high temperature - this makes welds and cutting difficult to control. Too far from the work, and the flame has lost its energy through steam losses. Too close, and the flame is so hot it will lose too much material, or damage it. The presence of unburned hydrogen also makes the OH torches unsuitable for welding steel and iron - the hydrogen is incorporated into the weld, making it exceedingly brittle and liable to fracture.

However, some materials, like aluminium, aren't affected by this - they have good thermal conductivity, so can cope with the high flame temp, and it doesn't incorporate hydrogen into the welds - so you can get acceptable results from hydrogen torches.

Industrial users tend to prefer the more modern plasma torches. These create an ultra-hot gas plasma from a stream of gas (air on cheap models, CO2 or other specialist gas for more powerful or specialised machines), by electrical heating of the gas. Plasma torches are more energy efficient [than electrolytic hydrogen generators] and controllable (you can control temperature and flow rate directly) than oxy-hydrogen, without the problems of introducing impurities, and of variable flame temperature, plus they are can be ultra-portable as air-models are completely fuelless - just supply electricity. No tanks, no liquids or gases to top up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Energy Technology All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Atom News FeedRSS 1.0 News FeedRSS 2.0 News FeedRSS Forums Feed