Peak Oil News

 

  Login or Register
 
Menu
 News
 Search
 Topics
 Stories Archive
 Submit News
 Discussions
 Code of Conduct
 Forums
 Forums Search
 Last 24 Hours
 PO 24hrs
 Peak Blog
 Resources
 About Us
 Downloads
 Web Links
 PeakWiki
 PeakPortal
 Focus Search
 Peak TV
 Peak Oil Boston
 Members
 Your Account
 Members List
 Ignore List
 JOIN!
 Private Messages
 
Light Sweet Crude Oil
 
google
 
PeakSpeak
NICKNAME

Download TeamSpeak
What is PeakSpeak?
Peak Oil on IRC
 
Member Quotes
NYMEX Crude Oil (Light) ........................121.20 5.64 NYMEX NYH RBOB Gasoline (Globex) ...... 3.0421 .1318

Don’t worry, just a little bump - $70 is just around the corner. Short traders just keep making those margin calls, mortgage the house if you have to. Fortunes await you! PO is for pansies and doomers. At $70 short some more ..... it is going back to $22 .... the world is awash with oil ........ reality has nothing to do with it, its all in those charts!!!!!!!!!!

SELL SELL SELL

shortonoil

Suggest Quote

 
Photo Album
Submit Photo
Peakoil.com is You!


member photos
 
ICM
Cisco & Net App Training
 
Peak Oil News: Forums

Peakoil.com :: View topic - The Windsor Field : 21.5 Bn barrels potential for C21
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The Windsor Field : 21.5 Bn barrels potential for C21

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Energy Technology
View previous topic :: View next topic  

In view of peak oil, what % of your govt's overall spending on non-fossil energy development would you channel to this option in your country ?
80%
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
60%
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
40%
50%
 50%  [ 2 ]
25%
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
10%
50%
 50%  [ 2 ]
Total Votes : 4

Author Message
backstop
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Aug 24, 2004
Posts: 1532
Location: Varies

PostPosted: Tue Oct 12, 2004 1:35 pm    Post subject: The Windsor Field : 21.5 Bn barrels potential for C21 Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

The Windsor Field : 21.5 Bn barrels potential for C21

A massive new field of unconventional oil has been identified in the realm centred on Windsor castle, home of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II.

Though long rumoured, data on the Windsor field has yet to leak widely and is currently confined mostly to forums such as this and to a few specialist websites. No doubt the news will spread at a rate demonstrating the interest additional energy supplies now attract.

The crude product is potentially available in very large quantities particularly in the western and northern uplands of Her Majesty's realm, though lowland production shows good prospects in areas where it can compete successfully with existing land uses.

One significant aspect of the resource is that the crude material has an energy density that does not warrant haulage further than about 3 miles, so well-screened modular micro-refineries serving local needs plus export to the cities is considered the logical approach in terms of operational efficiency.

The well-proven refinement process currently yields high-grade fuel at around 55% by weight of feedstock, with an energy content that is potentially equivalent to petrol. This yield is expected to rise to over 60% by weight as a new catalytic production process (whose research was EU-funded) is brought to market in the next few years.

Field development and micro-refinery provision is projected to require overall front-end capital inputs comparable with the UK experience of the North Sea fields. Given foreseeable popular and official approval, the Windsor field should be well into major production within 10 years.

Current projections of annual output accept a limitation of access to only 20% of the UK’s area, which is projected to yield an average of around 50.0 MTs /yr of crude feedstock. At a 60% conversion efficiency will give 30 MTs /yr of fuel. In terms of daily fuel-yield at 6.3lbs/US gallon, this would represent a supply of about 685,000 barrels per day. If the field were managed just to maintain this rate of production it should yield around 21.5 billion barrels during the rest of this century.

One further anomaly of the crude feedstock is that while all UK mineral rights are crown property, in being an organic product it is legally the property of the landowner or tenant.


Technical Notes

Roughly one third of the UK is classified as unproductive moorland or marginal hill pasture. Lamb farming in these uplands is currently barely viable despite heavy government subsidies. As a result, many farms’ sons and daughters have already chosen to leave the land. Given a reliable alternative income a high proportion farmers can be expected to welcome their land’s diversification into the new rural industry.

Using land drawn primarily from the two categories above, 20% of the UK's area would equal 45,000 sq mls or 11.655M hectares (28.79M acres).

11.655Mha.s yielding at a projected average of 4.3Ts crude
feedstock /ha/yr, give an output of 50.12 MTs /yr of crude feedstock.

Income to the producer is thus drawn from the retail sale of around 750 gls(UK) (3,410 litres) of fuel per hectare /year

The crude feedstock is commonly known as “Dry Coppice Wood”, and is produced by the ancient and highly sustainable arts of coppice forestry to give better yields of deciduous poles than normal cohort silviculture. This is achieved by felling one of a group of plots or ‘coups’ on a cycle normally of between 7 and 28 years, and allowing the trees to regrow from the stump to be ready to harvest again by the time all other plots in the group have been felled. This gives the advantage of having a large and active root-ball to generate vigorous growth on the stump, rather than, as in cohort regimes, harvesting trees at maturity and then having to replant them.

The liquid fuel product is called Methanol or Wood Alcohol, and is eminently suitable for piston engines, turbines and fuel cells. Its energy density is such that its use in Methanol Fuel-Cell Vehicles can displace petrol used in SI-ICE engines roughly gallon for gallon.

This unconventional oil resource has various unique benefits. Of these perhaps the most notable are:

A massive boost both to rural employment and enterprise, as well as to biodiversity due to the exceptional habitat coppice woodlands provide;

A substantial self-funding flood-prevention capacity by slowing the outflow of intense rainfall from the uplands into watercourses;

A significant uptake of carbon during the establishment of new coppice woodlands (prior to the modular micro-refineries’ manufacture and installation) and a substantial reduction of UK CO2, CO, NOx and VHC emissions once the fuel is widely employed;

A notable improvement of the UK’s trade balance by reducing the need both to import increasingly scarce fossil oil and to purchase the tradable carbon credits that import would entail;

A potentially pivotal European leadership in an energy technology that has outstanding global relevance, legitimacy and sustainability, but in which few countries have yet developed expertise.


Further (less partisan) details on the Windsor field are available on request.


regards,

Backstop


PS . . . You may wish to consider additional posts on this issue before casting a vote in the poll on your Govt.'s spending priorities.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stayathomedad
Tar Sands
Tar Sands


Joined: Jul 18, 2004
Posts: 73
Location: wilmington, nc

PostPosted: Tue Oct 12, 2004 1:48 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

uuuhhhh....back to burning mulch again...... 5arg wonder how many dead guys they are going to find burried down there

nice satire, but then at least a couple of inbread nobles are going to be warm in the winter
_________________
It just gets better every day....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sololeum
Tar Sands
Tar Sands


Joined: Sep 26, 2004
Posts: 40
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Wed Oct 13, 2004 2:19 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Ya big mug - he had to use satire otherwise no one would take any notice!!

I presume it is a chestnut coppice - used to be the source of poles for fencing / building etc.

Now to using it as a fuel!! Is this sane - use it for necessity or driving the nation crazy!

In Vi Et Silva
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Optimist
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Sep 28, 2004
Posts: 220

PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2004 5:08 pm    Post subject: Better idea Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Why bother with dry coppice wood?

There is a readily available fuel which is already delivered to designated sites. Thus transportation costs = 0. People are currently paying good money to get rid of this fuel, so production cost is negative! No land needs to be set aside to grow this fuel, no need to enter the fuel vs food debate. Fuel production automatically increases with population growth, in fact fuel production usually grows faster than the population. It is the perfect fuel and it is everywhere.

I am refering to trash, of course. It includes the vast quantities of wastepaper the "paperless" office is producing, it includes sewage sludge, it includes yard clippings. Sawdust, autumn leaves, old shopping bags, worn clothing, dead animals, spoilt food, it's all there. Any organic waste is part of this fuel.

I have no idea if the TDP process will work as its inventors claim. I do know that they have proposed to use the ultimate renewable fuel. How best to convert the raw fuel into a useful form of energy is a technical detail that would be worked out in due course, and I expect the efficiency of the conversion process to keep improving over time.

It might even turn out that producing methanol is the optimal solution...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chris-h
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Oct 11, 2004
Posts: 446

PostPosted: Sat Oct 16, 2004 7:02 am    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Very simply.

Industialised nations do not want non industialised nations to become industrialised.

Because

a)Industrialization create pollution.
b)Industialised nations do not want non industialised nations to become industrialised because if they do they will not be able to buy their resourses on the cheap and sell them their refined final products very expensively.
c)Industrialization allows for modern weapons that allows for military strentgh.

If the UK creates such an infrastructure to convert trees into fuel
(low tech because it happened in war world two)
then it going to show to developing nations how easy it is to make their own fuel.


Then developing nations will do so and create their own fuel.
Results.
a) Petrodollar dead USA economy dead.
b)World price of wood paper and anything that is made from wood will go skyhigh (maybe 10 times more)
c) IMF policies that stop developed nations from industrializing will fail (they do so by limiting the supply of oil to the local economy so more can be exported)
d) Strong armies that exist to protect oil will lose their meaning and half funding .
e)All poor nations will start industrializing. Imagine instead of 1 CHINA *FIVE* CHINAS.Final products cheap,resourses expensive, intellectual property created by law and big guns to restect those laws not respected
(like in china made dvd what do you think they are so cheap when the royaltes for 1 dvd is 20$ ? )
f) All the priviledges enjoyed by the developed nations will evaporate.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chris-h
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Oct 11, 2004
Posts: 446

PostPosted: Sat Oct 16, 2004 7:05 am    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

GOD i mean admins i want an edit button.I am butchering the english language and i cannot edit my posts to correct it.
Please .
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Optimist
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Sep 28, 2004
Posts: 220

PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2004 2:24 pm    Post subject: Why bother? Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

You still have not answered the question: Why bother with dry coppice wood?

If you can have the same benefits without many of the costs if you use trash instead of dry coppice wood. And doing so without refering to a mega-conspiracy theory would be refreshing indeed...

PS. Why edit when you can preview?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Energy Technology All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Atom News FeedRSS 1.0 News FeedRSS 2.0 News FeedRSS Forums Feed