I think this is the beginnings of an economy based on perpetual growth and fossil fuel energy running headlong into geological energy constraints. Basically I see an undulatory downward path for the rest of my life. From here out, I think any rallies in our economic condition are going to be met with spiking commodity prices that knock us right back down.
Joined: Apr 21, 2004 Posts: 508 Location: Republic of Texas
Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 11:33 am Post subject: Re: The BEST Post-Peak U.S. Locations Thread
I would much rather worry about staying cool at 105F than worry about staying warm at 5F. I don't think most people spend enough time outdoors to know what an extended period of time at either extreme is really like. _________________ The road goes on forever and the party never ends - REK
Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 11:40 am Post subject: Re: The BEST Post-Peak U.S. Locations Thread
Deep frost kills and that is good to combat agriculture pests and human diseases. Farm infestations and epidemics ravage tropical lands and always will. That is why civilization started in temperate climates.
You can not grow tropical foods without fertilizers and biocides. On the other hand, wheat is easy to grown organically and was the first commercial organic product in the US. _________________ ree rah rip ram. sunofabitch godamn. hidey didey christ almighty. rah rah crap
Joined: Mar 05, 2006 Posts: 30 Location: Venezuela
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 8:37 pm Post subject: Re: The BEST Post-Peak U.S. Locations Thread
pstarr wrote:
Deep frost kills and that is good to combat agriculture pests and human diseases. Farm infestations and epidemics ravage tropical lands and always will. That is why civilization started in temperate climates.
You can not grow tropical foods without fertilizers and biocides. On the other hand, wheat is easy to grown organically and was the first commercial organic product in the US.
You need to rethink your position here and learn a new word: "PERMACULTURE"
I don't know where you live, but you don't seem to have a lot of experience growing things in the tropics- otherwise you'd know that quite a bit of tropical food is grown without "fertilizer and biocides" in a process that's been called farming for a very long time. Now that we're modern, we can take advantage of the advances in modern food production techniques and avoid things like NPK and toxic rescue chemistry.
A permaculture technique like installing a carbon filter on your home's wastewater will seize the excess nitrogen that literally goes down the drain, and allow you to recover it and use it as an organic form of fertilizer after it's composted. In the tropics there is also a lot more organic matter to compost due to the year-round growing season.
The tropics allow you to keep a year-round rotational food production system going, so you don't have to worry about food storage issues, other than what you keep on hand for emergencies. Temperate climates will always have to devote a certain amount of time and energy to food storage issues, and a problem with the food supply at the beginning of winter is a major problem.
Your argument about civilization starting in temperate climates would probably take you a lot further if you simply pointed out that the concept of "winter" forced people to think in terms of future consequences... and those that didn't plan starved. In addition, the winters were periods when people had time to think and plan for the coming year. Is it any surprise that such cultures tended to flourish? Everything goes to the man with the plan. _________________ Strategic Relocation to Margarita Island
http://bulletproofretirement.com
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 10:45 pm Post subject: Re: The BEST Post-Peak U.S. Locations Thread
Bulletproof, I know exactly what Permaculture is. I have studied it and I own Mollison's book by the same name.
It is a nice approach to small-scale intensive gardening and theoretically could feed the world's population. However, given the ghetto-ization of most of the worlds people, either in teeming slums or vast suburban sprawls, I don't see it making an impact.
Please, if you have evidence to the contrary let me know. Can you name me one tropical country or region (or temperate or a aboreal) that depends on 'permaculture' or organic methods today? I understand Cuba has made great progress in this direction, but I see no evidence the country has weaned itself from petroleum.
Tropical infestations are fought with chemistry and pharmaceuticals. While theoretically interesting, permaculture remains a marginal middle-class white person's idealization of traditional farming methods. It is no panacea. _________________ ree rah rip ram. sunofabitch godamn. hidey didey christ almighty. rah rah crap
Joined: Jun 26, 2004 Posts: 1191 Location: Madison,Wisconsin
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 10:55 pm Post subject: Re: The BEST Post-Peak U.S. Locations Thread
Not to break from the threads topic, but a page ago someone asked about subdivisions and Mc Mansions and what they meant to people who actually see them.
I think this is an important topic to define, so I'll put it like this. In my area ( South central Wisconsin USA) alot of farms no longer wish to be farmers. They then sell that land to developers, who Subdivide it into little .5 to 1 acre lots, and sell it off for like 10 times what the entire plot of land cost them to buy, making huge profits. People then put houses on those small plots of land that effectively take up the entire plot of land, leaving no room for any food cultivation. These houses are as someone pointed out, totally dependant on cheap and available fossil fuels for heating and just about everything. And they are popping up everywhere, hence giving rise to the name Mc Mansions.
There you have it. There is a reason this type of housing for the most part isn't seen in Europe. It's because it's really really not sustainable in the long term. In 40 years, you won't see it in the US either.
As for the discussion of locations, honestly, if your looking for sheer geography, I do like my location in SC wisconsin. Lots of people starting to make the changes nessesary to survive, if you make an effort lots of community. Decent growing season, winters are survivable with huge wood lots all over. Deer in abundance so that I could eat venison most of the winter for a food supply. ( heck the DNR would probably love me for reducing the herd)
I guess the most pro factor for me is it's home. It's a place I've spent alot of time in and know it's in's and out's. To me that's the biggest factor. If your the type that can make anywhere home, well, that's more germane. But home is where my heart and body are, and will stay. =) _________________ Azreal60
There's some excellent ones for specific regions as well. Great Lakes Region
It might not affect *you*, but with decreased mobility following P.O. your kids might be stuck farming the same land you did.
This assumes you either have kids or are planning very long term. Also, note that climate models vary widely. You can't use them to pick lotto numbers. _________________ TANSTAAFL
Joined: Mar 05, 2006 Posts: 30 Location: Venezuela
Posted: Mon May 01, 2006 11:54 pm Post subject: Re: The BEST Post-Peak U.S. Locations Thread
pstarr wrote:
It is a nice approach to small-scale intensive gardening and theoretically could feed the world's population. However, given the ghetto-ization of most of the worlds people, either in teeming slums or vast suburban sprawls, I don't see it making an impact.
Please, if you have evidence to the contrary let me know. Can you name me one tropical country or region (or temperate or a aboreal) that depends on 'permaculture' or organic methods today? I understand Cuba has made great progress in this direction, but I see no evidence the country has weaned itself from petroleum.
Tropical infestations are fought with chemistry and pharmaceuticals. While theoretically interesting, permaculture remains a marginal middle-class white person's idealization of traditional farming methods. It is no panacea.
You made a blanket statement that was incorrect ("You can not grow tropical foods without fertilizers and biocides"), and now you're trying to tell me that I'm wrong because permaculture methods aren't in widespread use? That's bogus, but to go on and claim that it's a "middle-class white person's idealization of traditional farming methods" tells me that you're trolling way out of your depth.
Reading the book is only the first step- after that the real education begins. Then too, "Permaculture, A Designers Manual" is a manual for people who actually have experience and knowledge of agrarian systems at their disposal. You may have read the book but your comments indicate that you flat out don't know what you're talking about. I'm not only a permaculture practicioner, I live in a tropical environment. When I lived in a temperate climate (Kentucky) I employed a number of permaculture techniques, but there is a lot more available to me in a tropical climate.
panacea n. A remedy for all diseases, evils, or difficulties; a cure-all.
If the disease is the salt theory of fertilizer (NPK) and toxic "rescue" chemistry, you're wrong: Permaculture is very much a panacea for this problem. The fact that political considerations of agricultural policy will not accept or promote it is beside the point. Food production has been satisfied up to this point with a mechanistic approach to farming, but that's a deviation from the norm of the historical model. I suspect that we'll see a regression to the mean in the near future, just as I expect that we'll see a large drop in the world's population. With cereal grain stocks at an all-time low, I expect that we'll see it sooner than most people think.
Anyway, since we are dealing with personal solutions rather than political solutions, I'd have to say that Permaculture is a great way for the individual to solve a lot of problems. If you choose to live in a temperate climate you'll have to deal with problems unique to temperate climates... but that doesn't make the temperate climate inately superior to tropical climates. Both have advantages and disadvantages. _________________ Strategic Relocation to Margarita Island
http://bulletproofretirement.com
Joined: Aug 15, 2005 Posts: 269 Location: Hicktown OK
Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 10:12 pm Post subject: Re: The BEST Post-Peak U.S. Locations Thread
I think that if you can find a place that is at least an hour drive in any given direction to a major city, and at least 30 miles away from the nearest interstate, and has a thriving small town community, with a major water source easily accesible, and people already used to making do on the land they have, be it cattle or corn or what have you, then you are talking about the area from eastern Oklahoma on through to the Ozarks. Only thing I am personally concerned about is that there is an air base less than 50 miles in one direction and an Army weapons depot less than 50 miles away in another direction..not good if there is to be an all out nuclear war. One of the things to look for where you want to live, is how much of a community atmosphere there is. If people are independent to the point of not caring for their neighbors, then it isn't a good one to be in. But if you have a community that always has a jar out for whoever lost their home in a tornado or fire, or for someone going through cancer treatment or recovering from a car crash, then it isn't too far of a step from that to organizing a small militia made up of volunteers..especially if there is already a volunteer fire dept., so there would already be a precedent for it.
And yes, I know this is an old thread, but I have been perusing through a number of the threads here, and thought that maybe this one could be worth a second look. _________________ Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe.-H.G. Wells
All times are GMT - 6 Hours Goto page Previous1, 2, 3, 4
Page 4 of 4
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum