Peak Oil News
Pro4xMentor.com

 

  Login or Register
 
Menu
 News
 Search
 Topics
 Stories Archive
 Submit News
 Discussions
 Code of Conduct
 Forums
 Forums Search
 Last 24 Hours
 PO 24hrs
 Peak Blog
 Resources
 About Us
 Downloads
 Web Links
 PeakWiki
 PeakPortal
 Focus Search
 Peak TV
 Peak Gear
 Members
 Your Account
 Members List
 Ignore List
 JOIN!
 Private Messages
 
Light Sweet Crude Oil
 
google
 
PeakSpeak
"PeakSpeak"
"dan"
NICKNAME

Download TeamSpeak
What is PeakSpeak?
Peak Oil on IRC
 
Member Quotes
We cannot drill our way out of this oil crisis. Since 2000, oil companies working in the U.S. have doubled the number of wells drilled per year.

Although increased drilling has added new oil to the nation's supply, it has not done so fast enough to offset the terminal decline of existing fields.

We are going to have to import more of our oil. Period.

MonteQuest

Suggest Quote

 
Photo Album
Submit Photo
Peakoil.com is You!


member photos
 
Peak Oil News: Forums

Peakoil.com :: View topic - Extraction rate data.
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Extraction rate data.

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Depletion Modeling
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Soft_Landing
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: May 28, 2004
Posts: 377

PostPosted: Wed Jun 30, 2004 11:35 am    Post subject: Extraction rate data. Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

You hear a lot of talk about how technology has increased the rate at which we can extract oil from a reservoir. But i've never seen a quantification of how much this has changed.

The gaussian extrapolation really assumes that the extraction profile for oil wells is not systematically varied through time. But I guess we know that this is happening. This does mean that the overall distribution will not be gaussian, but instead, be skewed to some degree, resulting in a higher peak, and steeper depletion.

The 1850 trillion dollar question is: how much? So if anyone has any quantitive data about the rate of change of the depletion profile over time, it love to know about it. Thanks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sololeum
Tar Sands
Tar Sands


Joined: Sep 26, 2004
Posts: 40
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Thu Dec 02, 2004 8:56 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

I've really got no idea BUTTTT..............

Take a look at http://www.aph.gov.au/hansard/reps/commttee/R6228.pdf
This link shows on page 17, Dr. Neil Williams, Chief Executive Officer – Geoscience Australia advising the House of Reps that we have very little oil left and it is declining fast... 11 to 4 years since 2000 I think!! A cliff in oil depletion in anyone's book.

The most worrying is the giant Ghawar Field in Saudi Arabia peaked in 1981 www.gregcroft.com/ghawar.ivnu and it is widely believed that as a result Saudi Arabia has Peaked and if so axiomatically so too the world.. This view of a Saudi Peak = World Peak is promulgated by Matthew Simmons founder and CEO of Simmons and Company International.

The really worrying issue is that modern "Super Straw" technology now employed universally by the oil industry to extract oil more efficiently has masked Peak, which in current thought shows the half way point in oil stocks.

Australia does not fit this more traditional model and nor the North Sea nor does Ghawar, the slow ride to depletion still talked about will no doubt be a giant slippery slide not a roll a coaster!

To get attention I opine that the first Campbell report in 85 (Petroconsultants) saying the world would Peak in 2000 was right and that we are NOW on an undulating plateau.

We may only have 40% of oil left but most people still think we have 50% or more to go!!!

If you artificially keep production up in major fields such as Ghawar and then add new smaller fields it looks as though the world is still expanding production (true) and therefore must have over half left (may well be untrue). The decline when sets in is not a gradual decline but a short sharp fall as here in Australia.

What do you reckon!!

Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Depletion Modeling All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Atom News FeedRSS 1.0 News FeedRSS 2.0 News FeedRSS Forums Feed