Peak Oil News

 

  Login or Register
 
Menu
 News
 Search
 Topics
 Stories Archive
 Submit News
 Discussions
 Code of Conduct
 Forums
 Forums Search
 Last 24 Hours
 PO 24hrs
 Peak Blog
 Resources
 About Us
 Downloads
 Web Links
 PeakWiki
 PeakPortal
 Focus Search
 Peak TV
 Peak Oil Boston
 Houston Peak Oil
 Members
 Your Account
 Members List
 Ignore List
 JOIN!
 Private Messages
 
google
 
PeakSpeak
NICKNAME

Download TeamSpeak
What is PeakSpeak?
Peak Oil on IRC
 
Photo Album
Submit Photo
Peakoil.com is You!


member photos
 
Light Sweet Crude Oil
 
Member Quotes
Like the illusion of Wall Street, with its vast and powerful investment banks, now shuttered, China too is an illusion perpetuated by the Globalists that gave us the 15,000 mile Caesar salad, poisoned cat food and lead based paint on babies' pacifiers. Like the illusion that money would come from thin air to always push housing prices higher, China has spent a generation pursuing its illusion. Pursuing an unattainable dream to be like the West, while 6000 years of its carefully shepherded top soil blows into the sea.

shortonoil

Suggest Quote

 
ICM
Cisco & Net App Training
 
Peak Oil News: Forums

Peakoil.com :: View topic - statistics on energy used in manufacturing
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

statistics on energy used in manufacturing

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Welcome
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
johnmarkos
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude


Joined: May 19, 2004
Posts: 892
Location: San Francisco, California

PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 2:14 pm    Post subject: statistics on energy used in manufacturing Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

I'm interested in finding out how much energy is actually used to produce items like laptops, bicycles, automobiles, solar panels, et cetera. And what is the source of this energy?

To boil it down to specific questions:

1. How much energy is required to manufacture a bicycle/laptop/automobile/solar panel? Are we talking about oil or electricity?

2. What is the basis of the assertion that in the future, we won't have enough energy to manufacture solar panels? How much oil is used in their manufacture? Could that oil be replaced with something else?

3. What's the EROEI of a solar panel?

If you have statistics on this stuff, I'd like to know your sources.

Thanks,
John
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rembrandt
Tar Sands
Tar Sands


Joined: Aug 21, 2004
Posts: 59

PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 2:31 pm    Post subject: Re: statistics on energy used in manufacturing Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

johnmarkos wrote:

1. How much energy is required to manufacture a bicycle/laptop/automobile/solar panel? Are we talking about oil or electricity?


which production methods? factory assembly?

Quote:

2. What is the basis of the assertion that in the future, we won't have enough energy to manufacture solar panels? How much oil is used in their manufacture? Could that oil be replaced with something else?


scale of the amount of panels we need to produce in the amount of time there is oil to produce them. Plus we need to switch to produce a huge amount pretty fast.

Quote:

3. What's the EROEI of a solar panel?


according to heinberg's the party's over --> solar --> photovoltaics EROEI 1.7 to 10

According to BP solar ( i emailed them) the output energy in the total lifespan of the panel is 20 times as big as the production energy. This is only the factory production energy. So you have to count in production of basic needed elements, movement of elements to factory and movement of solar panel to house.

As far as i know the basic panel lies somewhere around an Eroei of 4 in the beginning degrading to less then 2 in a matter of years. You have better panels ofcourse
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
stayathomedad
Tar Sands
Tar Sands


Joined: Jul 18, 2004
Posts: 73
Location: wilmington, nc

PostPosted: Sat Oct 09, 2004 6:51 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

The problem is that no one really knows. This is a large scale problem, and with solar panels and lap tops, you are not looking at a 'cottage' industry. You need so much stuff that goes into that. that any EROIE given for any technology is questionable. The thermodynamic limit is 27%. That is that if you invest 100%, the most you get out of it is 27%, if the manufacture and delivery and conversion to new energy is based on a technological process, and it goes downward by about 70% for every step you have. So, if you do something and it requires transportation, mining, factories, you look at downward spiral, unless you get energy from somewhere that has been accumulated/stored for a long time, such as coal, oil, uranium.

Hope that helps, the rule of thumb is 1/3 of what you put in you get.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
johnmarkos
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude


Joined: May 19, 2004
Posts: 892
Location: San Francisco, California

PostPosted: Sun Oct 10, 2004 11:24 am    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

I wrote,

Quote:

1. How much energy is required to manufacture a bicycle/laptop/automobile/solar panel? Are we talking about oil or electricity?


Rembrandt responded,

Quote:

which production methods? factory assembly?


I suppose it varies between products. For a laptop, I would say factory manufacture of the parts. I (or my wife, who is more talented at putting those little bits back together -- she fixed her own powerbook once) could put the parts together at home. For a bicycle, I'd also say factory manufacture of the parts. For an automobile, I guess you need the whole thing -- some people know how to assemble autos from kits but most people aren't willing to invest the time. For a solar panel? I have no idea.

At any rate, the factories could be right here in California so transportation could be minimized. They already make cars here -- it wasn't too long ago that all of those other things were built here as well. Also, California (and much of the U.S.) has a great culture of restoration -- of cars, bicycles, et cetera. Some people love to do it themselves, even when they don't need to. Maybe part of the transition to the future economy will involve a renaissance in that culture.

BTW, I've been reading the book, "Prosperous Way Down," by Howard T. Odum and Elisabeth C. Odum. Fascinating stuff. I don't think I fully grok the way emergy works but it's definitely an interesting idea.

I'm trying to visualize the San Francisco Bay Area economy (not Mad Max, I hope) of twenty or thirty years from now.

John
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
johnmarkos
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude


Joined: May 19, 2004
Posts: 892
Location: San Francisco, California

PostPosted: Wed Oct 27, 2004 12:05 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Quote:

According to BP solar ( i emailed them) the output energy in the total lifespan of the panel is 20 times as big as the production energy. This is only the factory production energy. So you have to count in production of basic needed elements, movement of elements to factory and movement of solar panel to house.


So could BP Solar sprinkle the world with solar powered solar panel factories (thus reducing movement of solar panel to house)? What basic elements are needed for manufacture, other than sand and iron?

John
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
steve
Coal
Coal


Joined: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 2
Location: Sausalito,California

PostPosted: Wed Dec 15, 2004 2:38 pm    Post subject: solar eroei "standard" Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

I am also interested in finding the total eroei on anything manufactured. Is there a standard for calculating the total eroei? from mining of raw material to disposal in landfill. all the steps in between should be considered. with a solar panel should the wire and battery be considered along with the energy to assemble the solar package. deep cycle batteries last only 5 years so for the lifespan of a solar panel, typically 20-25 years, 4 or 5 new batteries must be purchased. i think with any product the eroei should also include the building of the factory and the tooling for production. i can only think that the true eroei on any product is very low when all factors are considered.


can anyone explain in laymens terms what "thermodynamic limit" is?[I]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Denny
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Jul 10, 2004
Posts: 1714
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Wed Dec 15, 2004 8:31 pm    Post subject: Painting processes Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

One thing that used to astound me years ago in the auto industry was the amount of energy consumed to put on that combined 3 mil layer of paint primer and top coat. To start with, the capital investment in the paint shops of auto makers is usually about half the total investment of an assembly plant, so a corresponing huge amount of energy to go into fabricating that structure. We are talking here about a monster amount of steel that goes into paint booths and the long snaking ovens, held at about 220 C, typically 1 km long for each paint bake stage. A succession of 50 hp electric motors to drive the fans used to suck outside air in and then heat it to 22 degrees C and then blast it all out again a couple of minutes later with the flashed off solvents. They do use water borne paints now to avoid environmental problems with hydrocarbons, a big improvement.

I think if technology could come with a better coating method there could be big energy reductions. I know many years ago, there were Gleaner farm combines with were not top coat painted just galvanized steel, but they did look real ugly.

Maybe some type of shrink wrap vinyul decal material?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Jul 21, 2004
Posts: 1333
Location: Suburban tar sands

PostPosted: Thu Dec 16, 2004 1:53 am    Post subject: Re: Painting processes Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Denny wrote:

I think if technology could come with a better coating method there could be big energy reductions. I know many years ago, there were Gleaner farm combines with were not top coat painted just galvanized steel, but they did look real ugly.

Galvanized windmills:
http://www.galvanizeit.org/showContent,314,358.cfm
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CalgaryEng
Tar Sands
Tar Sands


Joined: Oct 11, 2004
Posts: 47

PostPosted: Sat Dec 25, 2004 9:15 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Here is an interesting article concerning photovoltaics that might be relevant to your inquiry.

http://www.homepower.com/files/pvpayback.pdf
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Jul 21, 2004
Posts: 1333
Location: Suburban tar sands

PostPosted: Sun Dec 26, 2004 1:31 am    Post subject: Re: statistics on energy used in manufacturing Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

johnmarkos wrote:
I'm interested in finding out how much energy is actually used to produce items like laptops, bicycles, automobiles, solar panels, et cetera. And what is the source of this energy?

2. What is the basis of the assertion that in the future, we won't have enough energy to manufacture solar panels? How much oil is used in their manufacture? Could that oil be replaced with something else?

3. What's the EROEI of a solar panel?


Some info from Googling:
eroei solar wind nuclear oil biofuel
http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&safe=off&q=eroei+solar+wind+nuclear+oil+biofuel&btnG=Search&meta=
epr solar wind nuclear oil biofuel
http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&safe=off&q=epr+solar+wind+nuclear+oil+biofuel&btnG=Search&meta=
eroi solar wind nuclear oil biofuel
http://www.google.ca/search?q=eroi+solar+wind+nuclear+oil+biofuel&btnG=Search&hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&safe=off

Graph on page 13 of:
http://stcwa.org.au/papers/data/Energy_Quality.pdf
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Welcome All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Atom News FeedRSS 1.0 News FeedRSS 2.0 News FeedRSS Forums Feed