Peak Oil News

 

  Login or Register
 
Menu
 News
 Search
 Topics
 Stories Archive
 Submit News
 Discussions
 Code of Conduct
 Forums
 Forums Search
 Last 24 Hours
 PO 24hrs
 Peak Blog
 Resources
 About Us
 Downloads
 Web Links
 PeakWiki
 PeakPortal
 Focus Search
 Peak TV
 Peak Oil Boston
 Houston Peak Oil
 Members
 Your Account
 Members List
 Ignore List
 JOIN!
 Private Messages
 
google
 
PeakSpeak
NICKNAME

Download TeamSpeak
What is PeakSpeak?
Peak Oil on IRC
 
Photo Album
Submit Photo
Peakoil.com is You!


member photos
 
Light Sweet Crude Oil
 
Member Quotes
I think this is the beginnings of an economy based on perpetual growth and fossil fuel energy running headlong into geological energy constraints. Basically I see an undulatory downward path for the rest of my life. From here out, I think any rallies in our economic condition are going to be met with spiking commodity prices that knock us right back down.

smallpoxgirl

Suggest Quote

 
ICM
Cisco & Net App Training
 
Peak Oil News: Forums

Peakoil.com :: View topic - Why ethanol sucks -- can someone check my math
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Why ethanol sucks -- can someone check my math
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Conservation & Efficiency
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Clouseau2
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Oct 18, 2004
Posts: 266
Location: San Francisco, CA

PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 12:51 pm    Post subject: Why ethanol sucks -- can someone check my math Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

I was just going to compare the equivalent KWH energy production on one acre of land using corn (ignoring inputs) versus having an acre of solar panels.

1 acre can produce 370 gallons/ethanol per year. 1 gallon of ethanol is 75,700 BTUs or 22 KWH.

So you get 8140 KWH/acre/year worth of energy.

1 acre of solar panels gives you:

800 watt/sq meter * 8 hrs per day * 365 days a year * 4046 sq meters per acre * .2 solar cell efficiency / 1000 (watt to KW) = 1,890,291 KWH worth of energy

You get 232 times as much useful energy from solar cells as from ethanol.

If I made any mistakes or wrong assumptions, please correct them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
strider3700
Fission
Fission


Joined: Apr 17, 2005
Posts: 2750
Location: Vancouver Island

PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 1:01 pm    Post subject: Re: Why ethanol sucks -- can someone check my math Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

The likely hood of getting perfect solar conditions 8 hours a day 365 days a year is likely zero in most parts of the world.
_________________
shame on us, doomed from the start
god have mercy on our dirty little hearts
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
WisJim
Expert
Expert


Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Posts: 1206
Location: western Wisconsin

PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 1:31 pm    Post subject: Re: Why ethanol sucks -- can someone check my math Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Here in Western Wisconsin, we get the equivelant of 4 hours of good sun per day, on an annual basis (from a couple of years records of actual electrical output.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
FoxV
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Mar 02, 2005
Posts: 1337
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 1:39 pm    Post subject: Re: Why ethanol sucks -- can someone check my math Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

now for your next exercise, calculate the cost of one acre of corn production to the cost of one acre of solar panels

And that's when you'll see why Solar Sucks
_________________
Angry yet?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Clouseau2
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Oct 18, 2004
Posts: 266
Location: San Francisco, CA

PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:10 pm    Post subject: Re: Why ethanol sucks -- can someone check my math Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

strider3700 wrote:
The likely hood of getting perfect solar conditions 8 hours a day 365 days a year is likely zero in most parts of the world.


Even if you half it it's still 100 times as much.

Of course 1 acre of solars cells costs a lot of money, but you don't have to keep using oil & natural gas to keep feeding them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sheb
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Apr 16, 2007
Posts: 218
Location: New Mexico

PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:23 pm    Post subject: Re: Why ethanol sucks -- can someone check my math Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Clouseau2 wrote:
I was just going to compare the equivalent KWH energy production on one acre of land using corn (ignoring inputs) versus having an acre of solar panels.

1 acre can produce 370 gallons/ethanol per year. 1 gallon of ethanol is 75,700 BTUs or 22 KWH.

So you get 8140 KWH/acre/year worth of energy.

1 acre of solar panels gives you:

800 watt/sq meter * 8 hrs per day * 365 days a year * 4046 sq meters per acre * .2 solar cell efficiency / 1000 (watt to KW) = 1,890,291 KWH worth of energy

You get 232 times as much useful energy from solar cells as from ethanol.

If I made any mistakes or wrong assumptions, please correct them.


Although the assumptions a little generous, your calculations are on the right track. But step back a level. Comparing corn/ethanol to solar cells is like comparing apples to puppies--while both edible, they are really vastly different:)

For one thing, you could fairly easily grow an acre of corn, year after year. Even *without* fossil fuels. But if you can puchase an acre's worth of solar cells, then I salute you!

If you can grow corn, I would grow corn. But I would have *some* solar cells on hand too, for redundancy and backup, the quantity determined by your budget. You could *always* trade them later. Ditto for wind turbines.

However, your post does hit the nail on the head in one sense, comparisons aside...producing fuels in a world of peak oil is going to be HARD work. Alot of folks get excited because we *can* create biodiesel and ethanol, thinking it is the 11th hour black-box solution we are looking for to enable to continue business as usual. But they have no Idea what the numbers actually look like. Your calculations were definitely a peak under the lid of that box.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Clouseau2
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Oct 18, 2004
Posts: 266
Location: San Francisco, CA

PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:38 pm    Post subject: Re: Why ethanol sucks -- can someone check my math Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Sheb wrote:
Clouseau2 wrote:
I was just going to compare the equivalent KWH energy production on one acre of land using corn (ignoring inputs) versus having an acre of solar panels.

1 acre can produce 370 gallons/ethanol per year. 1 gallon of ethanol is 75,700 BTUs or 22 KWH.

So you get 8140 KWH/acre/year worth of energy.

1 acre of solar panels gives you:

800 watt/sq meter * 8 hrs per day * 365 days a year * 4046 sq meters per acre * .2 solar cell efficiency / 1000 (watt to KW) = 1,890,291 KWH worth of energy

You get 232 times as much useful energy from solar cells as from ethanol.

If I made any mistakes or wrong assumptions, please correct them.


Although the assumptions a little generous, your calculations are on the right track. But step back a level. Comparing corn/ethanol to solar cells is like comparing apples to puppies--while both edible, they are really vastly different:)

For one thing, you could fairly easily grow an acre of corn, year after year. Even *without* fossil fuels. But if you can puchase an acre's worth of solar cells, then I salute you!

If you can grow corn, I would grow corn. But I would have *some* solar cells on hand too, for redundancy and backup, the quantity determined by your budget. You could *always* trade them later. Ditto for wind turbines.

However, your post does hit the nail on the head in one sense, comparisons aside...producing fuels in a world of peak oil is going to be HARD work. Alot of folks get excited because we *can* create biodiesel and ethanol, thinking it is the 11th hour black-box solution we are looking for to enable to continue business as usual. But they have no Idea what the numbers actually look like. Your calculations were definitely a peak under the lid of that box.


I was mostly thinking it from two divergent futures ...

One future where we attempt to switch over to biofuels to keep things running.

Another where we invest heavily in battery driven electrics.

Assuming the costs of solar cells come down significantly, it looks like the latter future has more hope.

Especially since the efficiencies of the energies produced by the solar cells are so much better too.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PhebaAndThePilgrim
Expert
Expert


Joined: Jul 29, 2005
Posts: 252
Location: Show-Me State

PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:40 pm    Post subject: Re: Why ethanol sucks -- can someone check my math Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Good luck: From Pheba, from the farm:
You can figure at least one pound of synthetic nitrogen fertilizer (think natural gas) for each bushel of corn. Not each acre, each bushel. The maximum corn output on the top land in the U.S. is 200 bushels per acre. That is an amazing figure. Add potash and phosphate to the mix. Also, add fuel for the tractor and combine, etc. Add fuel to transport the corn, process the corn, etc. etc.
Here at our farm we have stopped feeding corn to our cattle. We can no longer afford it.
We are spiralling into a black hole of negative energy in the U.S. because of ethanol.
Ethanol is insane.
Pheba.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Niagara
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude


Joined: Aug 17, 2006
Posts: 518
Location: Mt. Hubbert Scenic Lookout

PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 4:14 pm    Post subject: Re: Why ethanol sucks -- can someone check my math Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Phebagirl wrote:
Ethanol is insane.
Pheba.

Yup, the physics is really simple. Any moonshiner knows you must burn cordwood to power your still. If you fueled your still with the ethanol you collected, you would end up with nothing.

But politicians are smarter than that. They say "Corn is grown by farmers, farmers vote at the polls"

Economists say "look at the Business Plan. If the end product is priced high enough, it will work."
_________________
Remember: 73.3% of statistics are made up
and the other 23.6% are wrong
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ohanian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Oct 17, 2004
Posts: 1143

PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 4:55 pm    Post subject: Re: Why ethanol sucks -- can someone check my math Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Clouseau2 wrote:
I was just going to compare the equivalent KWH energy production on one acre of land using corn (ignoring inputs) versus having an acre of solar panels.

1 acre can produce 370 gallons/ethanol per year. 1 gallon of ethanol is 75,700 BTUs or 22 KWH.

So you get 8140 KWH/acre/year worth of energy.

1 acre of solar panels gives you:

800 watt/sq meter * 8 hrs per day * 365 days a year * 4046 sq meters per acre * .2 solar cell efficiency / 1000 (watt to KW) = 1,890,291 KWH worth of energy

You get 232 times as much useful energy from solar cells as from ethanol.

If I made any mistakes or wrong assumptions, please correct them.


MY advice are as follows:

(1) You can't use all the area for solar panel, so drop the area from 4046 square metres to 2023 square metres of solar panel per acre.

(2) You do not get 8 hours of sunshine per day. So drop that to a conservative 4 hours of sunshine per day.

(3) You do not get 20% in photovoltaic, so drop that to 10%

The end result is 236,000 kwh/acre/year of electricity.
Still better than ethanol.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Clouseau2
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Oct 18, 2004
Posts: 266
Location: San Francisco, CA

PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 5:10 pm    Post subject: Re: Why ethanol sucks -- can someone check my math Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

ohanian wrote:
Clouseau2 wrote:
I was just going to compare the equivalent KWH energy production on one acre of land using corn (ignoring inputs) versus having an acre of solar panels.

1 acre can produce 370 gallons/ethanol per year. 1 gallon of ethanol is 75,700 BTUs or 22 KWH.

So you get 8140 KWH/acre/year worth of energy.

1 acre of solar panels gives you:

800 watt/sq meter * 8 hrs per day * 365 days a year * 4046 sq meters per acre * .2 solar cell efficiency / 1000 (watt to KW) = 1,890,291 KWH worth of energy

You get 232 times as much useful energy from solar cells as from ethanol.

If I made any mistakes or wrong assumptions, please correct them.


MY advice are as follows:

(1) You can't use all the area for solar panel, so drop the area from 4046 square metres to 2023 square metres of solar panel per acre.

(2) You do not get 8 hours of sunshine per day. So drop that to a conservative 4 hours of sunshine per day.

(3) You do not get 20% in photovoltaic, so drop that to 10%

The end result is 236,000 kwh/acre/year of electricity.
Still better than ethanol.


You don't get 20%? These claim it

Also, I sure do get 8 hours of sunshine here in California ...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ohanian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Oct 17, 2004
Posts: 1143

PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 7:09 pm    Post subject: Re: Why ethanol sucks -- can someone check my math Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Clouseau2 wrote:
ohanian wrote:
Clouseau2 wrote:
I was just going to compare the equivalent KWH energy production on one acre of land using corn (ignoring inputs) versus having an acre of solar panels.

1 acre can produce 370 gallons/ethanol per year. 1 gallon of ethanol is 75,700 BTUs or 22 KWH.

So you get 8140 KWH/acre/year worth of energy.

1 acre of solar panels gives you:

800 watt/sq meter * 8 hrs per day * 365 days a year * 4046 sq meters per acre * .2 solar cell efficiency / 1000 (watt to KW) = 1,890,291 KWH worth of energy

You get 232 times as much useful energy from solar cells as from ethanol.

If I made any mistakes or wrong assumptions, please correct them.


MY advice are as follows:

(1) You can't use all the area for solar panel, so drop the area from 4046 square metres to 2023 square metres of solar panel per acre.

(2) You do not get 8 hours of sunshine per day. So drop that to a conservative 4 hours of sunshine per day.

(3) You do not get 20% in photovoltaic, so drop that to 10%

The end result is 236,000 kwh/acre/year of electricity.
Still better than ethanol.


You don't get 20%? These claim it

Also, I sure do get 8 hours of sunshine here in California ...


Straight from wikipedia

Typical solar panels have an average efficiency of 12%, with the best commercially available panels at 20%. Thus, a photovoltaic installation in the southern latitudes of Europe or the United States may expect to produce 1 KWh/m²/day. A typical "150 Watt" solar panel is about a square meter in size: such a panel may be expected to produce 1 KWh every day, on average, after taking account the weather and the latitude.

In the Sahara desert, with less cloud cover and a better solar angle, one can obtain closer to 8.3 kWh/m²/day. The unpopulated area of the Sahara desert is over 9 million km², which if covered with solar panels would provide 750 terawatts total power. The Earth's current energy consumption rate is around 13.5 TW at any given moment (including oil, gas, coal, nuclear, and hydroelectric power).[1]

Let's calc again

1 kw/m^2 Sunshine at Equator

10% efficiency of Solar Panel

0.1kw/m^2 power per metre square of solar panel

4 hours sunshine/day (very conservative)

0.4 kwh/m^2/day energy per metre square of solar panel per day

2023 m^2/acre 50% usage of 1 acre for solar panel

809.2 kwh/acre/day

365 days/year

295,358 kwh/acre/year
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
frankthetank
Fusion
Fusion


Joined: Sep 16, 2004
Posts: 4863
Location: Southwest WI

PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 10:27 pm    Post subject: Re: Why ethanol sucks -- can someone check my math Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Last i heard, it requires a lot of energy to produce solar panels, so figure that in. You also HAVE to figure in inputs when growing corn. Just trying growing corn year after year with no inputs. Good luck with yields. You need to plant/weed/hope to god or great power for rain/sun/heat...etc etc. Another problem is solar panels produce when its sunny out, no power when dark and scary. Life is so complex.
_________________
Clothing should be optional.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pstarr
Expert
Expert


Joined: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 7138
Location: Behind the Redwood Curtain

PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2007 12:07 am    Post subject: Re: Why ethanol sucks -- can someone check my math Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

you must consider cradle-to-grave life cycle analysis when measuring and comparing primary energy sources. This entails an energy accounting and a tally of debits/credits and (for capitalized assets like solar panels, windmills etc.) depreciations.

Thus, the acre will produce corn ethanol year after to but each season it requires chemical inputs (including fertilizer and biocides) and especially energy for planting, cultivating, and harvesting. The grain must be milled, hydrolyzed, fermented, distilled, and cleaned to make ethanol. This cost energy.

Likewise silicon must crystalized at great energy expense to form solar arrays.

The value generated by this study is commonly called EROEI (energy returned on energy input.) It is an up-and-coming discipline that you might want to consider studying when you get to college.
_________________
director ree rah rip ram. sunofabitch godamn. hidey didey christ almighty. rah rah crap wav
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
aahala
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude


Joined: Feb 03, 2005
Posts: 954

PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 9:51 am    Post subject: Re: Why ethanol sucks -- can someone check my math Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

A large taxpayer donation would be necessary
to make a 1-acre project fully cost competitive.

The same amount of subsidy devoted to wind power would
create a lot more energy, and the same bonus to greater
efficiency wisely applied much greater still.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Conservation & Efficiency All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Atom News FeedRSS 1.0 News FeedRSS 2.0 News FeedRSS Forums Feed