www.PeakOil.com

2007 · Heavy Crude Joined: Aug 23, 2004 Posts: 141

I do like the 'structured anarchy' of PO.com as it is.

No suggestions here, just comments:

it's a bit difficult to be a anti-peakster on a peakoil board. Maybe mention that there is 'another side' and that the peak oil concept is a controversial/difficult theory - because of the consequences.

A 'graphic' note: the figure from API - it looks 'scanned' and detracts from the aesthetics.
&
There's no source on the first 'disc./prod.' graph.

Pops · Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2005 12:26 pm Post subject:

The discovery/production pic is more a graphic than a graph - itâ€™s to illustrate how one necessarily follows the other. Perhaps a caption to that effect, A?

True enough about non-peakers â€™07, but we did try to write the copy with as many ifâ€™s, mayâ€™s, etc as possible in order to leave room for discussion. The same for drawing conclusions â€“ open to the reader.
_________________
Make a plan and work it:

julianj · Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2005 3:42 pm Post subject: My 2 pennies

This version is much better!

I don't think the pic of the Middle East adds anything to the sense: I suggest you cut it out.

You might want to add just a line about how dependent on oil we are for not just power and transportation, but plastics and agriculture as well.

Otherwise excellent.

Julian