Like the illusion of Wall Street, with its vast and powerful investment banks, now shuttered, China too is an illusion perpetuated by the Globalists that gave us the 15,000 mile Caesar salad, poisoned cat food and lead based paint on babies' pacifiers. Like the illusion that money would come from thin air to always push housing prices higher, China has spent a generation pursuing its illusion. Pursuing an unattainable dream to be like the West, while 6000 years of its carefully shepherded top soil blows into the sea.
Joined: Dec 04, 2004 Posts: 2415 Location: perpetual state of exhaustion
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 12:16 pm Post subject: Re: Non-doomers live longer - Research-based evidence
YOu know what? I think like everything its a matter of perspective. You may see me as a doomer but I don't view myself that way at all.
So what if society crashes and we all wind up living like hobbits in earth houses, foraging all day for our food. I think I like that more than having to put up with this construct. I won't even start going on about my personal oppinions of what this life is doing to us, but I can't see that once the adjustment is made that living a much reduced life would be that much worse for us.
Joined: Oct 04, 2004 Posts: 5714 Location: Body in OK, Heart in TX
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 12:31 pm Post subject: Re: Non-doomers live longer - Research-based evidence
Lumpy wrote:
Yes, I believe lots of people are going to suffer and lots of people are going to die...
So even though I believe that things are going to change drastically, I don't see this as doom -- I see this as good and hopeful.
To me, being a doomer means thinking along these lines: "It's all coming crashing down, and there is nothing I can do on a personal level to change my life in order to make my future and the future of my loved ones and my community better after the crash."
I feel the same way. Most of us as individuals may (will) suffer horribly as we pass through the bottleneck, but on the other side things will be better for any survivors. For me that means maybe several generations from now, so I don't expect to see it. Nevertheless there's plenty we can and should do to plant seeds for that future. I don't like the word "hope" much myself, because it tends to elicit some undesirable reactions from both sides of the fence, but I do have hope about the post-dieoff future.
I do think there are things we can do to improve our chances and those of our communities and tribes, even though I'm a fast crash pessimist. I read your quote above in that light, which I think is how you intended it, not some "the secret" magical thinking BS. Basically despair makes us die. I agree with that because I've been there. There may be a time to give up, but it's not now. I'm not sure why people are coming down on you so hard, maybe it's the holidays. _________________ "Every junkie's like a setting sun..." - Neil Young
Joined: Nov 16, 2007 Posts: 307 Location: Rural Western Idaho
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 12:45 pm Post subject: Re: Non-doomers live longer - Research-based evidence
uNkNowN ElEmEnt wrote:
Lumpy, I think you are as guilty of not listening to us as we might be of you. The one kind of person you will find most often on this board are those who think using discernment is a gift and a priority. (Hey, I am trying to be nice cause you are new and take things personally... I am trying)
Just becuase someone says "this" is the best research out there doesn't mean there aren't plenty of other papers taht don't say the exact opposite. We aren't attacking you or your goal of bringing light to our dismal lives, we just don't agree with it... or parts of it.
Regardless, if you want to discuss it, then do so, but don't expect us to take it as gospel just becuase it was done by nuns (who wouldn't have any other agenda right?)
If we are such a waste of time to converse with then you are likely in the wrong place. Either way, welcome, good luck and I appoligize beforehand, but this isn't a play pen... it can get tough in here. But it is worth it, imo.
Well, to wax cliche-ish, I guess if I can't take the heat I should stay out of the kitchen. And if I want to play with the big kids, I'd better be ready to take a few "lumps" (no pun intended.) So thanks for reminding me of that.
Anyway, Amen to discernment as being gifts and priorities. You and I are, gulp, AGREEING!
Now that we are on relatively civil terms here, let me point out to you that
1. the study was not performed by nuns, they were the subjects of the study -- read the article carefully, please, before you attack it!
2. can you cite me your "plenty of other studies" that say the exact opposite" -- i.e. that exercising your brain does NOT help prevent dementia, and that a positive attitude does NOT contribute to a longer life
Slinging mud at one another gets us no where. Sharing info that might be valuable to one another does. (Not just you and me -- any of us on PO boards -- and humans in general.)
And I think it IS important to read one another's posts correctly. Someone here said something about my family not being as long-lived as other people's ... when I had just said that my folks are active octagenarians and even much older. That frustrates me -- not being carefully read. Maybe I'll have to get over it, but posting if people really don't read all the words does seem kind of pointless.
My choice, I guess, though - to keep posting/trying or not.
Thanks for the gesture of peace between us
Last edited by Lumpy on Sun Dec 23, 2007 1:32 pm; edited 1 time in total
Joined: Dec 04, 2004 Posts: 2415 Location: perpetual state of exhaustion
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 1:24 pm Post subject: Re: Non-doomers live longer - Research-based evidence
YOu can cite all the studies you want to... I don't believe them. I don't believe that there are that many optomistic people... out there. I think they chose passively pessimistic people for their test subjects, whose brains and bodies are going to shrivel up becuase of those reasons not because they might be pessimistic.
I think they may have a different definition of pessimism, becuase I don't think there are that many truly and noticeable optomistic people out there.
In my life I have only ever met 3 or 4 people I could truly call optomists (and I have met thousands of people). And though I liked them as people... frankly they drove me nuts!
Yes, they were lovely, and they loved bugging me about being such a skeptic and pessimist, and often tell me that I'd be happier as an optomist... but my life is not set up for that... maybe that's it... Maybe its that I live in a different socio-economic level than you do, cause I don't see many optomists down here.
I truly believe there are only maybe 1 optomist in 10,000 people. Maybe not as bad as that, but close, damned close. I think its more of this psychology (shrinkology) that tell us we are supposed to be happy and if we aren't then we need to see a shrink and fix it.
I think the rest of it is propaganda to try and convince us that that is how we are supposed to be. They appeal to our longing to live a long life and strive for a glimpse of immortality by telling us this is how we are supposed to be, and that if we are good little people we too can have this bliss.
Maybe I come from a long line of depressive pessimists but my grandpa just turned 93, and he's as ornery a SOB as you can get... My other grandpa finally died at 91 and he was the most abusive, biggest racist, mean, old bastard I'd ever met... bar none. And believe me I've met some real pricks.
Take my landlord for instance, or how about the senior prison guard who liked to make rookie women cry, or the murderer who once told a phone caller he wished he'd raped and killed the victim that got away so she'd shut up and stop marching for an endo to violence against women.
These are all really old bastards, if they aren't supposed to live as long, why are they still poisoning the world with their existence? I just don't see any evidence that what these studies profess is anywhere close to the reality around me.
Does this make any sense? am I getting across to anyone?
Joined: Jul 29, 2005 Posts: 252 Location: Show-Me State
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 1:24 pm Post subject: Re: Non-doomers live longer - Research-based evidence
Good day from Pheba, from the farm:
I tend to look at this subject from a different viewpoint. I am a people watcher. I often wish I had a degree in sociology. But then I would be dumbed down and would not be a people watcher.
My theory for what it is worth: I believe that people who do not accept the doomer mindset really do know how bad things are. I believe the frenetic shopping and mad consumption are all symptoms of a deep underlying, gut wrenching fear. I believe that people already know that we are on a runaway train. A person would have to be totally brain dead not to subconsciously absorb the signs that are all around us.
I am much happier knowing what is going on. I would rather face a bleak future head on than go around living with some nameless nagging fear that I just could not put my finger on.
Concerning the other subject being discussed on this site. I often hope that I still have enough brain cells floating around to find a way to end it if I get in really bad shape.
I would much rather die than end up with somebody changing my diapers while I prattle on endlessly about events that happened decades ago.
My Mother died of cancer. She passed away in my home. I was her caregiver for 17 months. I plan on taking myself out rather than suffering in such a manner. Good people, bad people. Cancer cells are like corporations. They don't give a rats ass about anything or anybody. they both exist for one purpose: growth.
There was a made for TV miniseries called: "Angels in America". I really liked it. I am a huge Al Pacino fan. In the film Pacino plays a real jerk. He is a powerful attorney who is gay and ends up with AIDS. There is another sweet young man named Pryor. Pryor also ends up with AIDS. Good person, bad person. Pathology does not care.
Bored and snowed in; again.
Pheba.
Joined: Nov 25, 2006 Posts: 1542 Location: New Jersey
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 3:20 pm Post subject: Re: Non-doomers live longer - Research-based evidence
Heineken wrote:
"Living longer"---what does that mean?
All the ailments, aches, and pains of old age. Slowly watching yourself lose all the functioning and abilities you hold dear.
Old age isn't something to aim for. Because by the time you get there, you'll find it isn't very worthwhile being there.
Take a walk down the hallway of a nursing home and you'll see what I mean.
Doesn't have to be that way.
Look at Jack LaLanne. Homeboy's 90 something years old and probably healthier in a number of ways than I am.
(I don't think he's 90 there, just the first image I found on Google image)
The point is, almost anything that's going to help you live longer is also going to help you become healthier, both in the present AND the future.
There are plenty of 70+'s NOT in the nursing home and who never will be. Chances are most of them eat frugally, do some excersise, aren't full of hate & bitterness and most importantly feel useful & loved by those around them. _________________ My PO Amazon store (shameless plug).
“Seek simplicity but distrust it”
Last edited by Narz on Sun Dec 23, 2007 3:24 pm; edited 1 time in total
Joined: Nov 16, 2007 Posts: 307 Location: Rural Western Idaho
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 3:22 pm Post subject: Re: Non-doomers live longer - Research-based evidence
Shannymara wrote:
I do think there are things we can do to improve our chances and those of our communities and tribes, even though I'm a fast crash pessimist. I read your quote above in that light, which I think is how you intended it, not some "the secret" magical thinking BS. Basically despair makes us die.
That is precisely what I intended.
And yes, despair will kill.
We are either growing or dying - the choice is each of ours.
Joined: Nov 25, 2006 Posts: 1542 Location: New Jersey
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 3:39 pm Post subject: Re: Non-doomers live longer - Research-based evidence
Phebagirl wrote:
Good day from Pheba, from the farm:
I tend to look at this subject from a different viewpoint. I am a people watcher. I often wish I had a degree in sociology. But then I would be dumbed down and would not be a people watcher.
My theory for what it is worth: I believe that people who do not accept the doomer mindset really do know how bad things are. I believe the frenetic shopping and mad consumption are all symptoms of a deep underlying, gut wrenching fear. I believe that people already know that we are on a runaway train. A person would have to be totally brain dead not to subconsciously absorb the signs that are all around us.
I am much happier knowing what is going on. I would rather face a bleak future head on than go around living with some nameless nagging fear that I just could not put my finger on.
Joined: Nov 16, 2007 Posts: 307 Location: Rural Western Idaho
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 5:19 pm Post subject: Re: Non-doomers live longer - Research-based evidence
uNkNowN ElEmEnt wrote:
So what if society crashes and we all wind up living like hobbits in earth houses, foraging all day for our food. I think I like that more than having to put up with this construct. I won't even start going on about my personal oppinions of what this life is doing to us, but I can't see that once the adjustment is made that living a much reduced life would be that much worse for us.
I agree - absolutely. _________________ "A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have." Thomas Jefferson
Joined: Nov 16, 2007 Posts: 307 Location: Rural Western Idaho
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 5:23 pm Post subject: Re: Non-doomers live longer - Research-based evidence
Narz wrote:
Doesn't have to be that way.
Look at Jack LaLanne. Homeboy's 90 something years old and probably healthier in a number of ways than I am.
The point is, almost anything that's going to help you live longer is also going to help you become healthier, both in the present AND the future.
There are plenty of 70+'s NOT in the nursing home and who never will be. Chances are most of them eat frugally, do some excersise, aren't full of hate & bitterness and most importantly feel useful & loved by those around them.
Hear, hear. Exactly right. _________________ "A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have." Thomas Jefferson
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:40 pm Post subject: Re: Non-doomers live longer - Research-based evidence
[quote="Lumpy"]
Narz wrote:
Doesn't have to be that way.
Look at Jack LaLanne. Homeboy's 90 something years old and probably healthier in a number of ways than I am.
The point is, almost anything that's going to help you live longer is also going to help you become healthier, both in the present AND the future.
There are plenty of 70+'s NOT in the nursing home and who never will be. Chances are most of them eat frugally, do some excersise, aren't full of hate & bitterness and most importantly feel useful & loved by those around them.
Physically healthy or not, I wouldn't want to live past 70yrs old. I'd be bored by then anyways... 70 yrs is more than enough, there's no need to get greedy. Hell, there are somedays I wake up and actually think about finding a high up balcony and... well you get the picture.
Joined: Jan 16, 2005 Posts: 322 Location: Delft, Netherlands
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 8:13 pm Post subject: Re: Non-doomers live longer - Research-based evidence
If you have a positive outlook on life, you will care better for yourself and your surroundings. If you a depressed, then you will neglect yourself and your surroundings. Seems pretty clear which one is better.
I'm a doomer, but that causes me no trouble. It's my current appraisal of the situation, and is subject to change as time moves on. It's not a state of mind.
The alienation is the thing that bugs me. I have difficulty sometimes relating to people who don't insist on trying to understand what the future might *actually* bring, instead of assuming status quo and hoping for the best. That causes me much more psychological pain then any squeemishness about doom.
Furthermore, I hate that I am for economic reasons tied to the current system which is causing problems and is as unsustainable as it is immutable, at core. Phebagirl has it right, but IMO the fear she talks about is this troubling worry in most people that they might not be a part of the problem per se, but they are certainly not part of the solution either.
I'd like my work to benefit humanity and the planet in some way, but there is just no money in that. If you can think of a new way people can waste energy and resources in a pleasant way, then that is probably a good idea for a new business. o the contrary: if you think of a way for people to use less energy and resources (for a price), prepare to go bankrupt pretty quickly. To earn some $$$ in this world you have to dance with the monster, which is capitalism and consumerism. The alternative is (voluntary) poverty.
Joined: Nov 16, 2007 Posts: 307 Location: Rural Western Idaho
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 9:45 pm Post subject: Re: Non-doomers live longer - Research-based evidence
You know, maybe part of the problem in comumication here is what the term "doomer" means to each of us.
I stated in an earlier post what I thought it meant. Maybe some of you could enlighten me as to what it means to you.
Would appreciate that. _________________ "A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have." Thomas Jefferson
Joined: Sep 14, 2004 Posts: 6625 Location: Rural Virginia
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 11:07 pm Post subject: Re: Non-doomers live longer - Research-based evidence
Sorry if I offended, Lumpy. I didn't pay proper attention to your newbie status here---normally I'm gentler and more welcoming.
This is somewhat of a soapbox issue for me, which is what provoked my outburst.
I think there are many people twitching around today who are already close to dead. Sitting in their cars in the creeping traffic jams, on the way to their office morgues or home to the mortgage. Marooned on a thousand other neon-lit moons I could list.
A discussion of length of life is meaningless without simultaneous consideration of quality of life. I think this society is too obsessed with living longer, at the expense of more important considerations, such as exactly how those lives are being spent. The ultimate expression of this nonsense is seen the medical professions, which too often jump through hoops to keep terminally ill people alive for a few days longer.
The opportunities for truly meaningful lives for average people are being pinched off at every turn. We should be talking more about that and less about making it to 100.
Also, I think I raised a significant point about difficulties in the future that are likely to shorten lifespans no matter how "positive" our attitudes are. Unless we pay more attention to those problems, we're unlikely ever to be in a position, as individuals, to know if your theory is true.
Many lives around the world are shortened by disease, war, and starvation. What about them? Doesn't it seem silly trying to live to 100 when a child in Niger is dying of typhoid complicated by malnutrition? What has happened to our priorities?
The point has been made elsewhere that too much optimism may lead to complacency over the issues that are threatening this planet and its passengers. If we feel good about ourselves and the world, we may be less likely to feel any urgency about taking the drastic measures that are needed to head off disaster.
I carefully re-read the article you linked and the linked item at the bottom of the article. I saw no actual discussion of the evidence linking a positive attitude to a longer life. It's possible that it was a finding of the study, but we don't know how strong the statistical association was. It would take many other well-designed studies to even begin to confirm this finding.
Fairly recently there was a study result suggesting that a positive attitude did not increase survival time in breast cancer victims. I don't have the link at hand. So, there may be conflicting evidence as well.
Bottom line: Doomers are not necessarily unhappy, negative people. For example, I'm a hard-core doomer who lives each day to the fullest and does what he can for the environment. I own 75 acres of land and I manage that land for a "green" future, even though I believe, based on all I have learned, that that future is likely to be "brown."
Perhaps I have learned more than is healthy for me. But facts are facts, and I prefer to face them head-on. _________________ "Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog
"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---Me and my brother
Joined: Sep 14, 2004 Posts: 6625 Location: Rural Virginia
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 11:38 pm Post subject: Re: Non-doomers live longer - Research-based evidence
Lumpy wrote:
You know, maybe part of the problem in comumication here is what the term "doomer" means to each of us.
I stated in an earlier post what I thought it meant. Maybe some of you could enlighten me as to what it means to you.
Would appreciate that.
A doomer is someone who believes that the future will be darker than today. How deep the darkness goes varies from doomer to doomer. Most believe there will be a large and perhaps rapid drop in the human population that will bring it down to the level of the natural carrying capacity (natural carrying capacity having been artificially and temporarily expanded by the cheap energy liberated by burning fossil fuels). Most also believe that a range of economic and environmental disasters are fairly imminent. Very few---probably none---believe that all life will disappear from Earth. We aren't crackpots, although that is the common public perception.
Doomers believe either (1) that no matter what we do today, we cannot avoid these calamities or (2) that we could avoid these calamities if we acted now, but that we aren't going to act now or ever, so the calamities are coming anyway.
A doomer's beliefs are usually based on evidence, not personality flaws. _________________ "Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog
"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---Me and my brother
All times are GMT - 6 Hours Goto page Previous1, 2, 3, 4Next
Page 2 of 4
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum