Peak Oil News
Pro4xMentor.com

 

  Login or Register
 
Menu
 News
 Search
 Topics
 Stories Archive
 Submit News
 Discussions
 Code of Conduct
 Forums
 Forums Search
 Last 24 Hours
 PO 24hrs
 Peak Blog
 Resources
 About Us
 Downloads
 Web Links
 PeakWiki
 PeakPortal
 Focus Search
 Peak TV
 Peak Gear
 Members
 Your Account
 Members List
 Ignore List
 JOIN!
 Private Messages
 
Light Sweet Crude Oil
 
google
 
PeakSpeak
NICKNAME

Download TeamSpeak
What is PeakSpeak?
Peak Oil on IRC
 
Member Quotes
Hoarding is exactly what the government is doing right now by filling the SPR, and frankly it's the best thing that could happen. It drives prices up. High prices encourage demand destruction. They also finance new well development. The hoarded oil gives us a buffer to fall back on once shortages become more prevalent. High prices are what we need in order to adapt to what's coming, and the sooner they happen, the better.

smallpoxgirl

Suggest Quote

 
Photo Album
Submit Photo
Peakoil.com is You!


member photos
 
Peak Oil News: Forums

Peakoil.com :: View topic - About Chris Skrebowski's report on 4% decline
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

About Chris Skrebowski's report on 4% decline

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Peak Oil Studies & Energy Reports
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
cipi604
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Aug 14, 2007
Posts: 215
Location: Montreal Canada

PostPosted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:39 am    Post subject: About Chris Skrebowski's report on 4% decline Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

http://www.aspousa.org/proceedings/houston/presentations/Chris%20Skrebowski%20megaprojects.pdf

Quote:
The hole in the bucket --How big and how fast is depletion?
•Around 5%-8% for areas in decline
•Net depletion 4% or around 3.3mn b/d/yr
•Net now double demand growth
•How do we know? IEA Medium Term Report
•Is depletion accelerating? –Yes slowly maybe 0.1-0.15%/yr
•Can it be ameliorated? –Yes, slow production down


It is just me, or 4% is really bad news?!

Or maybe is this one:
Quote:
Post-peak we are going to need other energy sources –Opportunity
•How fast will supply decline post-peak?
•Possibly around 2-3%/year like the US onshore but initially at just 1-2%
•But,itcould be much faster
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ayoob
Expert
Expert


Joined: Jul 15, 2004
Posts: 1002

PostPosted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:42 am    Post subject: Re: About Chris Skrebowski's report on 4% decline Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

A 4% decline rate indicates an 18-year halving time. Daily oil flow is 50% lower at the end of one halving time.

Which, IMO, means the end of civilization as we know it today. If the halving time is long enough and the will is there to replace oil with nuclear, solar, wind, ocean power, and liquid ammonia (ask matt simmons, I just saw him mention it in an interview the other day and don't know crap about it), then maybe civilization can survive this event.

18 years. It's possible that a 4% decline rate could be replaced by alternatives. Expensive, not distributed as easily, and possibly insufficient... but possible.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
americandream
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Oct 18, 2004
Posts: 1631
Location: kiwibush

PostPosted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:31 am    Post subject: Re: About Chris Skrebowski's report on 4% decline Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Can you imagine the mammoth effort it will take to co-ordinate this farce of a planet of dysfunctional nations towards this end?

I can't. It's way off the meter of possibility for me.
_________________
Bugger me, I hear oil's runnin out mate!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
MD
Community Manager


Joined: May 02, 2005
Posts: 3146
Location: One more question...

PostPosted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 5:05 am    Post subject: Re: About Chris Skrebowski's report on 4% decline Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

The report delivers a mixed message.

He gives a nod to "resource nationalism", but makes no effort to predict its impact.

In my opinion, "resource nationalism" will grow to be the significant factor over the next few years. It could happen very quickly in the form of embargoes, which would likely drop us right into WW3 overnight, or it could trickle in slowly, which will put the slow squeeze on importers.

I believe the squeeze is in process. You'd better all hope it doesn't tip out of control.
_________________
"Don't ever become a pessimist... a pessimist is correct oftener than an optimist, but an optimist has more fun, and neither can stop the march of events."
Robert A. Heinlein

md@peakoil.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cipi604
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Aug 14, 2007
Posts: 215
Location: Montreal Canada

PostPosted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 5:34 am    Post subject: Re: About Chris Skrebowski's report on 4% decline Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

I say that is impossible to keep the decline rate 2-4% after few years because of the problems that will appear from this huge lack of energy.
Because things tend to be much more complicated later on, the decline, or the total stopping of exports, will be much much higher.
Some thoughts about this?
In my opinion there is no possible way to handle the situation. You can call it bad luck.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kokoda
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Aug 24, 2006
Posts: 392

PostPosted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 6:31 am    Post subject: Re: About Chris Skrebowski's report on 4% decline Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Quote:
liquid ammonia (ask matt simmons, I just saw him mention it in an interview the other day and don't know crap about it), then maybe civilization can survive this event.


Just to side track ... I have been recently been reading up on liquid ammonia.

Good news is that it is easy to make and contains a fairly high octane level. Its byproducts are nitrogen and water.

Bad news ... Like hydrogen it is an energy carrier. It consumes more energy to make then it produces.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
waldo
Tar Sands
Tar Sands


Joined: Dec 22, 2007
Posts: 44

PostPosted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 8:34 am    Post subject: Re: About Chris Skrebowski's report on 4% decline Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Just for fun, this is my prediction for world crude oil production, just from simple curve fitting of all nations (peak of 12-month averaged at 74 Mb/d in late 2005). We have a second lower peak in early 2008, then downhill:
2008.04 73.64
2008.13 73.68
2008.21 73.71
2008.29 73.73
2008.38 73.73
2008.46 73.72
2008.54 73.69
2008.63 73.65
2008.71 73.59
2008.79 73.52
2008.88 73.44
2008.96 73.35
2009.04 73.26
2009.13 73.15
2009.21 73.04
2009.29 72.92
2009.38 72.80
2009.46 72.67
2009.54 72.54
2009.63 72.40
2009.71 72.26
2009.79 72.11
2009.88 71.96
2009.96 71.81
2010.04 71.65
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
evilgenius
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude


Joined: Dec 06, 2005
Posts: 806
Location: Stopped at the border.

PostPosted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 8:57 am    Post subject: Re: About Chris Skrebowski's report on 4% decline Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Of course, if the export land model holds (why shouldn't it) then the curve will be parabolic, not linear. The rate will increase at a rate of increase peculiar to domestic demand in producing countries. This will be worse in OPEC countries, I think.
_________________
"Hope encourages men to take risks; men in a strong position may follow her without ruin, if not without loss. But when they stake all that they have to the last coin (for she is a spendthrift), she reveals her real self in the hour of failure."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
seahorse
Expert
Expert


Joined: Oct 15, 2004
Posts: 2024
Location: Arkansas

PostPosted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:17 am    Post subject: Re: About Chris Skrebowski's report on 4% decline Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Someone unconfuse me. He predicts PO about 2011, but do his bullet points say declining oil production now (meaning PO now)?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheDude
Expert
Expert


Joined: Apr 06, 2006
Posts: 2625
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia

PostPosted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:21 pm    Post subject: Re: About Chris Skrebowski's report on 4% decline Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

I pointed out in the other CS report topic (Just how close to Peak Oil are we?) that he considers the 2011 date his most optimistic one; looks like 2009 otherwise.

Thread mergin' time. I like the title on this one better.
_________________
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
The god damn plane has crashed into the mountain!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cipi604
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Aug 14, 2007
Posts: 215
Location: Montreal Canada

PostPosted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:06 pm    Post subject: Re: About Chris Skrebowski's report on 4% decline Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

So it's pretty clear now. Thank you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
seahorse2
Expert
Expert


Joined: Oct 18, 2004
Posts: 1786

PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:41 pm    Post subject: Re: About Chris Skrebowski's report on 4% decline Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

From my reading of this latest report and other forecast on future oil production, the optimistic scenarios all assume continued big increases in Nigerian oil production. If increasing oil production in Nigeria is the foundation for PO optimism, its akin to the 2005 foundation for the "goldilocks" economy, which was based on the continued issuance of subprime "liar loans" now wreaking havoc throughout out the world's financial system.

These two attacks in the last week at par for the course in Nigeria:

Pipeline blast:

PO news article

Militants attack oil tanker in port.

Nigerian News
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LastViking
Tar Sands
Tar Sands


Joined: Feb 19, 2007
Posts: 94
Location: British Virgins

PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 6:41 pm    Post subject: Re: About Chris Skrebowski's report on 4% decline Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Quote:
It is just me, or 4% is really bad news?!



This underlying decline rate has basically been with us forever. The real pain commences when Conventional Oil peaks. At that point, Conv declines at 3.75% and can take All Liquids with it, failing immense annual new capacity.

If it hasn't already, Conv Oil will likely Peak between now and 2012. Then the fun really starts...

Best seen visually by Freddy Hutter's Scenario-2300 graph: http://trendlines.ca/freddyhutterscenario2300.htm At 66 mb/d, Conv Oil is 77% of All Liquids. When it goes, the whole shebang is in jeopardy.


Last edited by LastViking on Thu Apr 17, 2008 7:22 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
funzone36
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Dec 04, 2005
Posts: 179

PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 4:38 pm    Post subject: Re: About Chris Skrebowski's report on 4% decline Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Civilization as we know it won't exist. Assuming no nuclear warfare, civilization is very likely to survive after peak oil even if it has to endure severe hardships.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Peak Oil Studies & Energy Reports All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Atom News FeedRSS 1.0 News FeedRSS 2.0 News FeedRSS Forums Feed