| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
cipi604 Heavy Crude


Joined: Aug 14, 2007 Posts: 215 Location: Montreal Canada
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:39 am Post subject: About Chris Skrebowski's report on 4% decline |
|
|
http://www.aspousa.org/proceedings/houston/presentations/Chris%20Skrebowski%20megaprojects.pdf
| Quote: | The hole in the bucket --How big and how fast is depletion?
•Around 5%-8% for areas in decline
•Net depletion 4% or around 3.3mn b/d/yr
•Net now double demand growth
•How do we know? IEA Medium Term Report
•Is depletion accelerating? –Yes slowly maybe 0.1-0.15%/yr
•Can it be ameliorated? –Yes, slow production down |
It is just me, or 4% is really bad news?!
Or maybe is this one: | Quote: | Post-peak we are going to need other energy sources –Opportunity
•How fast will supply decline post-peak?
•Possibly around 2-3%/year like the US onshore but initially at just 1-2%
•But,itcould be much faster |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ayoob Expert


Joined: Jul 15, 2004 Posts: 1002
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:42 am Post subject: Re: About Chris Skrebowski's report on 4% decline |
|
|
A 4% decline rate indicates an 18-year halving time. Daily oil flow is 50% lower at the end of one halving time.
Which, IMO, means the end of civilization as we know it today. If the halving time is long enough and the will is there to replace oil with nuclear, solar, wind, ocean power, and liquid ammonia (ask matt simmons, I just saw him mention it in an interview the other day and don't know crap about it), then maybe civilization can survive this event.
18 years. It's possible that a 4% decline rate could be replaced by alternatives. Expensive, not distributed as easily, and possibly insufficient... but possible. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
americandream Light Sweet Crude

![]()
Joined: Oct 18, 2004 Posts: 1631 Location: kiwibush
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:31 am Post subject: Re: About Chris Skrebowski's report on 4% decline |
|
|
Can you imagine the mammoth effort it will take to co-ordinate this farce of a planet of dysfunctional nations towards this end?
I can't. It's way off the meter of possibility for me. _________________ Bugger me, I hear oil's runnin out mate! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MD Community Manager

Joined: May 02, 2005 Posts: 3146 Location: One more question...
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 5:05 am Post subject: Re: About Chris Skrebowski's report on 4% decline |
|
|
The report delivers a mixed message.
He gives a nod to "resource nationalism", but makes no effort to predict its impact.
In my opinion, "resource nationalism" will grow to be the significant factor over the next few years. It could happen very quickly in the form of embargoes, which would likely drop us right into WW3 overnight, or it could trickle in slowly, which will put the slow squeeze on importers.
I believe the squeeze is in process. You'd better all hope it doesn't tip out of control. _________________ "Don't ever become a pessimist... a pessimist is correct oftener than an optimist, but an optimist has more fun, and neither can stop the march of events."
Robert A. Heinlein
md@peakoil.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cipi604 Heavy Crude


Joined: Aug 14, 2007 Posts: 215 Location: Montreal Canada
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 5:34 am Post subject: Re: About Chris Skrebowski's report on 4% decline |
|
|
I say that is impossible to keep the decline rate 2-4% after few years because of the problems that will appear from this huge lack of energy.
Because things tend to be much more complicated later on, the decline, or the total stopping of exports, will be much much higher.
Some thoughts about this?
In my opinion there is no possible way to handle the situation. You can call it bad luck. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kokoda Heavy Crude


Joined: Aug 24, 2006 Posts: 392
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 6:31 am Post subject: Re: About Chris Skrebowski's report on 4% decline |
|
|
| Quote: | | liquid ammonia (ask matt simmons, I just saw him mention it in an interview the other day and don't know crap about it), then maybe civilization can survive this event. |
Just to side track ... I have been recently been reading up on liquid ammonia.
Good news is that it is easy to make and contains a fairly high octane level. Its byproducts are nitrogen and water.
Bad news ... Like hydrogen it is an energy carrier. It consumes more energy to make then it produces. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
waldo Tar Sands


Joined: Dec 22, 2007 Posts: 44
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 8:34 am Post subject: Re: About Chris Skrebowski's report on 4% decline |
|
|
Just for fun, this is my prediction for world crude oil production, just from simple curve fitting of all nations (peak of 12-month averaged at 74 Mb/d in late 2005). We have a second lower peak in early 2008, then downhill:
2008.04 73.64
2008.13 73.68
2008.21 73.71
2008.29 73.73
2008.38 73.73
2008.46 73.72
2008.54 73.69
2008.63 73.65
2008.71 73.59
2008.79 73.52
2008.88 73.44
2008.96 73.35
2009.04 73.26
2009.13 73.15
2009.21 73.04
2009.29 72.92
2009.38 72.80
2009.46 72.67
2009.54 72.54
2009.63 72.40
2009.71 72.26
2009.79 72.11
2009.88 71.96
2009.96 71.81
2010.04 71.65 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
evilgenius Intermediate Crude


Joined: Dec 06, 2005 Posts: 806 Location: Stopped at the border.
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 8:57 am Post subject: Re: About Chris Skrebowski's report on 4% decline |
|
|
Of course, if the export land model holds (why shouldn't it) then the curve will be parabolic, not linear. The rate will increase at a rate of increase peculiar to domestic demand in producing countries. This will be worse in OPEC countries, I think. _________________ "Hope encourages men to take risks; men in a strong position may follow her without ruin, if not without loss. But when they stake all that they have to the last coin (for she is a spendthrift), she reveals her real self in the hour of failure." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
seahorse Expert


Joined: Oct 15, 2004 Posts: 2024 Location: Arkansas
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:17 am Post subject: Re: About Chris Skrebowski's report on 4% decline |
|
|
| Someone unconfuse me. He predicts PO about 2011, but do his bullet points say declining oil production now (meaning PO now)? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheDude Expert


Joined: Apr 06, 2006 Posts: 2625 Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:21 pm Post subject: Re: About Chris Skrebowski's report on 4% decline |
|
|
I pointed out in the other CS report topic (Just how close to Peak Oil are we?) that he considers the 2011 date his most optimistic one; looks like 2009 otherwise.
Thread mergin' time. I like the title on this one better. _________________ Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
The god damn plane has crashed into the mountain! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cipi604 Heavy Crude


Joined: Aug 14, 2007 Posts: 215 Location: Montreal Canada
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:06 pm Post subject: Re: About Chris Skrebowski's report on 4% decline |
|
|
| So it's pretty clear now. Thank you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
seahorse2 Expert


Joined: Oct 18, 2004 Posts: 1786
|
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:41 pm Post subject: Re: About Chris Skrebowski's report on 4% decline |
|
|
From my reading of this latest report and other forecast on future oil production, the optimistic scenarios all assume continued big increases in Nigerian oil production. If increasing oil production in Nigeria is the foundation for PO optimism, its akin to the 2005 foundation for the "goldilocks" economy, which was based on the continued issuance of subprime "liar loans" now wreaking havoc throughout out the world's financial system.
These two attacks in the last week at par for the course in Nigeria:
Pipeline blast:
PO news article
Militants attack oil tanker in port.
Nigerian News |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LastViking Tar Sands


Joined: Feb 19, 2007 Posts: 94 Location: British Virgins
|
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 6:41 pm Post subject: Re: About Chris Skrebowski's report on 4% decline |
|
|
| Quote: | It is just me, or 4% is really bad news?!
|
This underlying decline rate has basically been with us forever. The real pain commences when Conventional Oil peaks. At that point, Conv declines at 3.75% and can take All Liquids with it, failing immense annual new capacity.
If it hasn't already, Conv Oil will likely Peak between now and 2012. Then the fun really starts...
Best seen visually by Freddy Hutter's Scenario-2300 graph: http://trendlines.ca/freddyhutterscenario2300.htm At 66 mb/d, Conv Oil is 77% of All Liquids. When it goes, the whole shebang is in jeopardy.
Last edited by LastViking on Thu Apr 17, 2008 7:22 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
funzone36 Heavy Crude


Joined: Dec 04, 2005 Posts: 179
|
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 4:38 pm Post subject: Re: About Chris Skrebowski's report on 4% decline |
|
|
| Civilization as we know it won't exist. Assuming no nuclear warfare, civilization is very likely to survive after peak oil even if it has to endure severe hardships. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|