For a minute there I thought I had to get off my couch, when all the while the fact is we don't have to do anything much but keep things afloat for just a few decades more! In fact, we'd best shut up about PO, because if our offspring finds out we knew about it all along, they'll turn and wring our necks come 2036!
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 10:39 pm Post subject: Re: I want someone to answer a few things for me...
I never said global demand will decline uniformly, I said global demand will decrease. If Europe, China, Japan, and the US all experience a slowdown, it will have a massive slowdown, and perhaps even decrease global demand for oil. I’m glad the middle east states are growing, but they won’t come close to touching what the super powers use now, regardless of how fast they expand in the near term.
And, I never said predict, I said most economists agree that the cost of oil is far over-valued when you look at the supply/demand. Your original statement of “we’re running out” isn’t true, we have enough oil to last decades, perhaps more if more if found. There is not a substantial up-tick in demand and there has not been a huge decrease in supply; hence the massive increase of oil is not due to, as you seem to think by your original statement, the scarcity of oil.
You seem to be displaying arm-waving prophecy with your doom and gloom statements. Things are not as bad as you make them out to appear and I would very much like for you to stop; its not painting an accurate picture of the situation.
And do you even take the time to read what I type? I said, anything over $95 dollars (hit in December of last year) is due to the steady decline in the value of the USD. Anything over about $70-75 is based on fear that Iran will cut off oil due to sanctions placed on it by the UN over its nuclear problem, or violence in the oil fields of Nigeria, or Venezuela cutting off oil supplies to the US. So no, the USD is not the only reason the value of oil has become double that of last year; it is the primary reason oil spiked to above $115. And yes, we know oil is up; but it does indeed matter what oil is priced in.
Joined: Aug 03, 2006 Posts: 4069 Location: Graceland
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 11:40 pm Post subject: Re: I want someone to answer a few things for me...
Divest wrote:
I never said global demand will decline uniformly, I said global demand will decrease. If Europe, China, Japan, and the US all experience a slowdown, it will have a massive slowdown, and perhaps even decrease global demand for oil. I’m glad the middle east states are growing, but they won’t come close to touching what the super powers use now, regardless of how fast they expand in the near term.
Worldwide demand destruction may occur, but it hasn't occurred yet.
Quote:
And, I never said predict, I said most economists agree that the cost of oil is far over-valued when you look at the supply/demand.
Why would an economist say that the market price was not supported by supply and demand? Isn't supply and demand what determines price? If it's not supply and demand driven, what is driving it? If an oil buyer decides he prefers to pay a lower price, where does he go to buy that cheaper oil?
Quote:
Your original statement of “we’re running out” isn’t true, we have enough oil to last decades, perhaps more if more if found. There is not a substantial up-tick in demand and there has not been a huge decrease in supply; hence the massive increase of oil is not due to, as you seem to think by your original statement, the scarcity of oil.
Who are you responding to when you say "you" and "your"?
Quote:
You seem to be displaying arm-waving prophecy with your doom and gloom statements. Things are not as bad as you make them out to appear and I would very much like for you to stop; its not painting an accurate picture of the situation.
That's not how it works. You have to make your argument with analysis and supporting data. Once you make your argument, people get to decide for themselves whether it makes sense.
Quote:
And do you even take the time to read what I type? I said, anything over $95 dollars (hit in December of last year) is due to the steady decline in the value of the USD. Anything over about $70-75 is based on fear that Iran will cut off oil due to sanctions placed on it by the UN over its nuclear problem, or violence in the oil fields of Nigeria, or Venezuela cutting off oil supplies to the US. So no, the USD is not the only reason the value of oil has become double that of last year; it is the primary reason oil spiked to above $115. And yes, we know oil is up; but it does indeed matter what oil is priced in.
Right. Some of the price of oil is dollar devaluation. Everyone will agree with you on that.
If you are interested in learning more about this topic, start off with EROEI and how the hard to extract oil provides less net energy.
The peak oil topic is really a rich subject and you may find it interesting to learn about. There are some reasonable counter-arguments to many of the peak oil predictions, but you have to study the matter before you will be able to make those arguments.
I'm not really sure what you're doing with today's rants. _________________
Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 1:29 am Post subject: Re: I want someone to answer a few things for me...
That’s a lot of fancy graphs. Lets start from the top. Global oil production still increased, and according to http://www.globalfirepower.com/list_oil_proven.asp (btw, Iran has about 14% of the worlds total reserves, not 80%), there is still about 900 billion barrels left, more so now because of recent finds in Brazil, and others in the north sea of the coast of Norway. So, no, chances are we have not hit peak oil, and at this point, when there has been several finds just within the past few months its premature to say that we have hit peak oil. Just like with most historical events, we won’t know when we’ve hit that point until well after the fact.
While I appreciate you’re graphs about the US, it just lends to my argument that your middle eastern countries who have been “expanding at a rapid rate” will come no where near the combined 33% of world oil that the US and China consumes; a decrease of anywhere between 1-3% demand of oil is like taking Russia or Spain off that graph completely; something that would have a sizeable effect on the price of oil.
And, after re-reading my argument, I don’t think I’ve ever made the claim that US oil production has risen, or have made any comment on US domestic oil production other then we should drill in ANWR, North Dakota and use the “tar sand” regions of Colorado, much like the Canadians have exploited theirs. And, correct me if I’m wrong- you failed to provide estimates- ANWR has not been fully explored; hence any estimate on how long it would last is premature, again.
I’m not, and never have, said its impossible for the US to undergo food shortages, I’m saying its extremely unlikely. If the rest of the world is in a food crisis, and it spreads here, we’ll simply cut off food exports; something that can be easily resumed once stability returns. It is considerably harder to restart an economy with half its work force unable to work due to years of starvation. Again; if things are “that bad” we as Americans will look out for other Americans first; that means ensuring we have food. But wait, lets look at your next point, if food prices drop due to a decreased dependence on ethanol, then the food crisis abroad will likely be a temporary (1 year) ordeal, because unless the weather is bad this year (i.e., a 2 week snow storm in China that cut rice production) things will stabilize out.
What agricultural product is grown in the south west? None that I can think of off the top of my head; and certainly if it was a huge problem, I’m sure someone would have said something like “what about commodity x?” in the past 10 years. The only problem the south west has is an increasing population and not enough water to go around. The whole food issue is overblown, the fact that it HAS happened before suggests a trend can be created, and using historical data, its likely to be a temporary issue; humans will adapt and find new places to grow these things or the strange weather of this past winter will not be a constant factor in future years.
Joined: May 07, 2007 Posts: 434 Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 4:04 am Post subject: Re: I want someone to answer a few things for me...
cube wrote:
Divest wrote:
...
And, I never said predict, I said most economists agree that the cost of oil is far over-valued when you look at the supply/demand.
...
link please
As the Cube asked, please cite your source/s
. _________________ "That the cream cannot help but always rise up to the top, well I say, <censored by peakoil.com> floats"
Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 4:26 am Post subject: Re: I want someone to answer a few things for me...
Divest wrote:
You seem to be displaying arm-waving prophecy with your doom and gloom statements. Things are not as bad as you make them out to appear and I would very much like for you to stop; its not painting an accurate picture of the situation.
An accurate picture implies accurate and comprehensive data. Such data are not available to us at this time. Therefore, we will continue to wave our arms about and make gloom and doom statements.
Divest wrote:
I would very much like for you to stop;
Ask me if I care.
Divest wrote:
And do you even take the time to read what I type?
No, of course not. Why should I?
Divest wrote:
I said, anything over $95 dollars (hit in December of last year) is due to the steady decline in the value of the USD. Anything over about $70-75 is based on fear that Iran will cut off oil due to sanctions placed on it by the UN over its nuclear problem, or violence in the oil fields of Nigeria, or Venezuela cutting off oil supplies to the US. So no, the USD is not the only reason the value of oil has become double that of last year; it is the primary reason oil spiked to above $115. And yes, we know oil is up; but it does indeed matter what oil is priced in.
Really? Anything over $95 is due to the decline in value of the USD? Let us consider the logic. If oil is $112.61 - as it is right now, per the WSJ, then $17.61 is due to dollar weakness - correct? But it is up 9 cents right now in; so does this imply the dollar is down? And down against what? The Yen? The Euro? Some undefined market basket of currencies?
You complain about a lack of rigor in the various arguments, and then you provide a blanket statement, without citations, with no indication of statistical analysis, no disclosure of significance, no discussion of likelihood, odds, or the applicable independent variables or predictors. That is an absurdity.
Oh, well. Not to worry. Per my original post, the angelic host is flapping vigorously to Titan. No doubt 33.128% of the price above $91.03 per barrel is due to the fear of molting among the angels, resulting in reduced flow. I got my statistics, along with the analysis, from the same place you seem to have obtained yours.
Joined: Oct 17, 2007 Posts: 114 Location: New of Zealand
Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 7:02 am Post subject: Re: I want someone to answer a few things for me...
divest wrote:
...we should drill in ANWR, North Dakota and use the “tar sand” regions of Colorado, much like the Canadians have exploited theirs.
Translated: ...we should drill anywhere, no matter the environmental cost, so I can keep my current lifestyle with no regard of future consequences.
Quote:
Environmental Defence has released a report calling the Alberta Oil Sands the most destructive project on Earth.
Few Canadians know that Canada is home to one of the world's largest dams and it is built to hold toxic waste from just one Tar Sands operation," Rick Smith, the executive director of Environmental Defence.
- At least 90% of the fresh water used in the oil sands ends up in ends up in tailing ponds so toxic that propane cannons are used to keep ducks from landing in them.
- Processing the oil sands uses enough natural gas in a day to heat 3 million homes in Canada.
- Producing a barrel of oil from the oil sands produces three times more greenhouse gas emissions than a barrel of conventional oil.
- The oil sands operations are the fastest growing source of heat-trapping greenhouse gas in Canada. By 2020 the oil sands will release twice the amount produced currently by all the cars and trucks in Canada.
Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 12:27 pm Post subject: Re: I want someone to answer a few things for me...
Jack wrote:
So, I wonder....is hunting trolls on a baited field actually feeding them?
Trolls thrive on carnage, Tiger. They consume, infest, destroy, live off the death and destruction of other species. _________________ "When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F Roberts.
Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 1:34 pm Post subject: Re: I want someone to answer a few things for me...
Pops wrote:
Aaron wrote:
...
Come on A. lots of good stuff posted on this thread - 1,600 somebodies have viewed it and perhaps had their questions answered due to Chumley.
BTW, what are ya gonna do for your 6,000th post?
Humor & nostalgia _________________ "When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F Roberts.
Joined: Jul 21, 2004 Posts: 1243 Location: Suburban tar sands
Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 12:21 am Post subject: Re: I want someone to answer a few things for me...
Divest wrote:
I never said global demand will decline uniformly, I said global demand will decrease. If Europe, China, Japan, and the US all experience a slowdown, it will have a massive slowdown, and perhaps even decrease global demand for oil.
...
You seem to be displaying arm-waving prophecy with your doom and gloom statements.
We call this "demand destruction" due to limited supply - it means that people have a declining standard of living.
All times are GMT - 6 Hours Goto page Previous1, 2, 3, 4
Page 4 of 4
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum