Peak Oil News

 

  Login or Register
 
Menu
 News
 Search
 Topics
 Stories Archive
 Submit News
 Discussions
 Code of Conduct
 Forums
 Forums Search
 Last 24 Hours
 PO 24hrs
 Peak Blog
 Resources
 About Us
 Downloads
 Web Links
 PeakWiki
 PeakPortal
 Focus Search
 Peak TV
 Peak Oil Boston
 Members
 Your Account
 Members List
 Ignore List
 JOIN!
 Private Messages
 
Light Sweet Crude Oil
 
google
 
PeakSpeak
NICKNAME

Download TeamSpeak
What is PeakSpeak?
Peak Oil on IRC
 
Member Quotes
For a minute there I thought I had to get off my couch, when all the while the fact is we don't have to do anything much but keep things afloat for just a few decades more! In fact, we'd best shut up about PO, because if our offspring finds out we knew about it all along, they'll turn and wring our necks come 2036!

Nano

Suggest Quote

 
Photo Album
Submit Photo
Peakoil.com is You!


member photos
 
ICM
Cisco & Net App Training
 
Peak Oil News: Forums

Peakoil.com :: View topic - THE US Strategic Petroleum Reserve Thread
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

THE US Strategic Petroleum Reserve Thread
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 18, 19, 20 ... 22, 23, 24  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Peak Oil Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert


Joined: Apr 09, 2007
Posts: 5312
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 12:57 pm    Post subject: Re: SPR Cutoff Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Cashmere wrote:
Who was the one no vote?


Sen. Allard (R-Colo).

Both Obama and Clinton flew to DC just to vote yes. McCain said he is also in favor, but he stayed out west on the campaign trail.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Volcanic21
Coal
Coal


Joined: Jan 28, 2008
Posts: 19

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 12:58 pm    Post subject: Re: SPR Cutoff Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

-deleted, beat to the punch-
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Revi
Fusion
Fusion


Joined: Apr 25, 2005
Posts: 3112
Location: Maine

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 12:59 pm    Post subject: The Senate just voted to quit filling the SPR Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

The Senate just decided that it's too expensive to keep filling the SPR:

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5imPz0z6szykAL-CAKZDEZOAiDREgD90KSK081

I think it will be more expensive when we run out of oil next winter.

It may not even help the price of oil. Bush may veto it, and I have to say that this is the first time I agree with him on anything.
_________________
Deep in the mud and slime of things, even there, something sings.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
green_achers
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Aug 14, 2005
Posts: 368
Location: Mississippi Delta

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 1:05 pm    Post subject: Re: The Senate just voted to quit filling the SPR Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

This is the one issue he's been pretty consistently right about IMO. For the wrong reasons, I'm sure...
_________________
WWJD? What would Joel Salatin do?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Revi
Fusion
Fusion


Joined: Apr 25, 2005
Posts: 3112
Location: Maine

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 1:14 pm    Post subject: Re: Senate vote to suspend SPR refilling Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

We're really in trouble now. When will oil hit $75 a barrel again? What is the matter with these people? Who voted them in to office? I hope that some congresspeople have more sense than the senators. I know Roscoe Bartlett will vote no, anyway.
_________________
Deep in the mud and slime of things, even there, something sings.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
emersonbiggins
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: Jul 10, 2005
Posts: 4924
Location: Dallas

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 1:14 pm    Post subject: Re: Senate vote to suspend SPR refilling Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

This move by Congress, like most lately, is framed as if the runup in oil prices is a temporary phenomenon. I am guessing $75/bbl is considered the "just price" for oil by Congress (and the American public?), and the price above and beyond that is just due to those greedy speculators Rolling Eyes
_________________
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin


Last edited by emersonbiggins on Tue May 13, 2008 1:19 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
UncoveringTruths
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude


Joined: Nov 04, 2004
Posts: 851

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 1:18 pm    Post subject: Re: SPR Cutoff Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

If we have an oil crisis these folks will look like kooks.

Wait are we in an oil crisis? eusa_shifty
_________________
It's a cold cold world when a man has to pawn his shoes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
baha
Tar Sands
Tar Sands


Joined: Jul 12, 2007
Posts: 43
Location: Mississippi, USA

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 1:27 pm    Post subject: Re: Senate vote to suspend SPR refilling Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Doesn't the president have sole control over the SPR? Is there anyway congress can force him to stop filling?

This is the one issue where Bush is right to keep filling. I'm sure he has inside info that says peak oil is here and that is why he insists on continuing.

Of course the consumer will never see any of this oil. It will be used by the military when TSHTF. You know we will have to eventually invade Venezuella and the rest of the middle east. If they are busy waging war maybe they'll leave me alone!!!
_________________
A horse is like a motorcycle that loves you back!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert


Joined: Apr 09, 2007
Posts: 5312
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 1:29 pm    Post subject: Re: Senate vote to suspend SPR refilling Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

baha wrote:
Doesn't the president have sole control over the SPR? Is there anyway congress can force him to stop filling?


Check out the US Constitution. Congress writes the laws.

The Senate just voted to make it crime to put oil in the SPR if crude costs more then $75/barrel. Pelosi and the House support the bill.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert


Joined: Apr 09, 2007
Posts: 5312
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 1:36 pm    Post subject: Re: Senate vote to suspend SPR refilling Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

While congress is just pandering to our citizens consumers, as Shanny elegantly put it, their new law to suspend SPR filling until oil drops below $75/barrel probably doesn't hurt anything.

The SPR is 96% full now.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dreamtwister
Fission
Fission


Joined: Feb 06, 2006
Posts: 2092

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 1:36 pm    Post subject: Re: Senate vote to suspend SPR refilling Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

This is good enough to be classified as black comedy. Seriously, I'm laughing so hard right now.
_________________
The whole of human history is a refutation by experiment of the concept of "moral world order". - Friedrich Nietzsche
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert


Joined: Apr 09, 2007
Posts: 5312
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 1:56 pm    Post subject: Re: Senate vote to suspend SPR refilling Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

"The action, supported by the Democratic and Republican presidential candidates, comes as high fuel costs have contributed to the nation's economic woes and become a hot issue on the campaign trail. It could be the only legislation that Congress passes this year in response to public angst at the fuel pump because of the parties' differences over energy issues. ---CNN

------------------------------

Its pretty funny and a bit sad too.... Cool

So this bill is the Congress's response to peak oil and the high oil prices.

This is their energy plan devised to deal with high energy prices...this is what we get from the US Congress as oil goes higher and higher.

No electric train systems, no nukes, no offshore drilling, no Manhattan project for energy, no crash programs......this is the new policy.

This is it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mefistofeles
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Mar 21, 2005
Posts: 155

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 2:16 pm    Post subject: Re: Senate vote to suspend SPR refilling Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

This sounds like the third film in the dumb and dumber series. Dumb and Even Dumber US Energy policy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kpeavey
Expert
Expert


Joined: Oct 04, 2004
Posts: 1127

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 2:20 pm    Post subject: Re: Senate vote to suspend SPR refilling Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Being an election year, I see this as trolling for votes, nothing more. Put a band aid on the gushing wound, get back to important issues.
_________________
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face--for ever."
-George Orwell, 1984

______________
Accept the Facts.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
frankthetank
Fusion
Fusion


Joined: Sep 16, 2004
Posts: 4275
Location: Southwest WI

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 2:25 pm    Post subject: Re: Senate vote to suspend SPR refilling Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Last week refineries were only running at 85%... What is this going to help with gasoline? Maybe congress should pass a law mandating refineries operate at a loss! Smile
_________________
"Oil is going up because we use too much oil, and the capacity to replace reserves is dwindling"
-President Bush 11/07/07
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Peak Oil Discussion All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 18, 19, 20 ... 22, 23, 24  Next
Page 19 of 24

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Atom News FeedRSS 1.0 News FeedRSS 2.0 News FeedRSS Forums Feed