Peak Oil News

 

  Login or Register
 
Menu
 News
 Search
 Topics
 Stories Archive
 Submit News
 Discussions
 Code of Conduct
 Forums
 Forums Search
 Last 24 Hours
 PO 24hrs
 Peak Blog
 Resources
 About Us
 Downloads
 Web Links
 PeakWiki
 PeakPortal
 Focus Search
 Peak TV
 Peak Oil Boston
 Members
 Your Account
 Members List
 Ignore List
 JOIN!
 Private Messages
 
google
 
PeakSpeak
NICKNAME

Download TeamSpeak
What is PeakSpeak?
Peak Oil on IRC
 
Photo Album
Submit Photo
Peakoil.com is You!


member photos
 
Light Sweet Crude Oil
 
Member Quotes
I want my mommy!

Buggy

Suggest Quote

 
aspo08
 
ICM
Cisco & Net App Training
 
Peak Oil News: Forums

Peakoil.com :: View topic - Reducing Emissions By Moving Traffic?
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Reducing Emissions By Moving Traffic?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Conservation & Efficiency
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
skiptamali
Tar Sands
Tar Sands


Joined: May 09, 2008
Posts: 56

PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 6:07 pm    Post subject: Reducing Emissions By Moving Traffic? Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

"Scientists working at Germany’s ORINOKO project are making progress on solving commute woes. The ORINOKO (Operative Regional Integrated and Optimized Corridor Control) Project has received funding from Germany and BMW to investigate large-scale transportation modeling that can improve efficiency and reduce traffic."

Maybe we can improve air quality by decreasing engine idling during peak traffic hours. I share the desire to shorten people's commutes and reduce emissions. Sounds like a great idea while we're figuring out alternative fuel vehicles, better transport, better city planning, etc... but is it too expensive? How much should we invest in this, and geographically where? Would this take funding away from other green projects?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kjmclark
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Dec 09, 2005
Posts: 318

PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 6:32 pm    Post subject: Re: Reducing Emissions By Moving Traffic? Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

This kind of thing is in the category of Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS). The proponents of ITS point out that by improving traffic flow, you can reduce emissions, improve mileage, and reduce travel times. They conveniently neglect to point out that they are simultaneously encouraging more motoring, making it more dangerous for cyclists and pedestrians, and encouraging longer commutes.

Frankly, the only ITS that makes any sense to me in peaking or post-peak and climate change aware world are changes that improve conditions for transit and non-motorized transportation. The only change I've heard of that does that are preemptive signaling for transit systems. All of the rest of it can be thought of as throwing away good money to increase roadway capacity.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
veliger
Tar Sands
Tar Sands


Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 82
Location: Western Maine, USA

PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 6:38 pm    Post subject: Re: Reducing Emissions By Moving Traffic? Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

The absolutely easiest fuel savings/carbon emission reduction is eliminating all toll booths/barriers. Making traffic stop or slow unnecessarily wastes huge amounts of fuel. Just add a penny or two to the fuel tax to make up for the lost toll revenue. In Lean Six Sigma this is known a ground fruit, even easier to get than low hanging fruit.

It's obvious the US and any other countries that still force traffic to slow down or stop at toll barriers are not even a little bit serious about reducing fuel consumption. They want to force us into cramped, little cars, but they won’t take the absolutely easiest, least painful fuel conservation step imaginable, eliminate all toll barriers!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
skiptamali
Tar Sands
Tar Sands


Joined: May 09, 2008
Posts: 56

PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 7:11 pm    Post subject: Re: Reducing Emissions By Moving Traffic? Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Veliger,
I agree that it seems the US isn't serious, and I think toll booths aren't the least of it. All one has to do is think about where we allow corporations to take profit and run with it... ie subsidizing big oil companies that are already raking in record profit-?!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
aahala2
Tar Sands
Tar Sands


Joined: Mar 25, 2008
Posts: 79

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2008 9:58 am    Post subject: Re: Reducing Emissions By Moving Traffic? Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

veliger wrote:
The absolutely easiest fuel savings/carbon emission reduction is eliminating all toll booths/barriers. Making traffic stop or slow unnecessarily wastes huge amounts of fuel.


I agree with the second statement but not the first. If we're
serious about emissions, we should INCREASE the toll during
peak times and eliminate it during off hours.

New York City had a congestion tax idea all lined up and the
powers that be had agreed if the city did this and that, the
state would agree but after the city had done this and that,
the speaker of house I believe it was, without explanation,
reneged and would not allow a vote.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
skiptamali
Tar Sands
Tar Sands


Joined: May 09, 2008
Posts: 56

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2008 12:00 pm    Post subject: Re: Reducing Emissions By Moving Traffic? Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

What would you think about increasing the toll, add more fastrak lanes aahala2?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
emersonbiggins
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: Jul 10, 2005
Posts: 5078
Location: Dallas

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2008 4:06 pm    Post subject: Re: Reducing Emissions By Moving Traffic? Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

veliger wrote:
They want to force us into cramped, little cars, but they won’t take the absolutely easiest, least painful fuel conservation step imaginable, eliminate all toll barriers!!!


The presence of toll roads has little to with traffic congestion, as [lightly-tolled] Texas has one of the highest rates of traffic congestion in the nation, sharing the perennial title with states like Georgia and California. With the latest RFID/electronic toll-tag systems, toll roads in Texas (and Oklahoma) allow drivers to pass through tollgates at speed, all but eliminating bottlenecks.

However, routing thru truck traffic around metropolitan areas would do more to eliminate congestion than perhaps any other single solution, including using the power of the state to condemn more frontage for adding lanes to the existing network.
_________________
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Conservation & Efficiency All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Atom News FeedRSS 1.0 News FeedRSS 2.0 News FeedRSS Forums Feed