Joined: Sep 14, 2004 Posts: 6475 Location: Rural Virginia
Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 9:12 pm Post subject: Re: solar power to hydrogen
Hydrogen cars are simply not practical, and are out-of-sight expensive.
Most of the fundamental problems haven't been solved.
They are interesting curiosities and will so remain. _________________ "Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog
"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---Me and my brother
Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 12:24 am Post subject: Re: Hydrogen Sulfide, Not Carbon Dioxide, May Have Caused La
EnergyUnlimited wrote:
Kylon wrote:
I can see a world where everyone will be wearing gas masks. Those that [have] them will live; those that don't will die.
Both will die, the former group will struggle for few days longer.
Absorber of gas mask works for few hours at best.
It needs reconditioning after that.
After few dozens of reconditionings it needs replacement.
On the top of it animals will die, most of plants will die etc, so there will be not much to eat.
Any survivors will live in areas where there is low enough concentration of H2S.
In other ares we shall see no survivors outside of nuclear grade underground shelters.
Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 2:09 pm Post subject: Hydrogen Sulfide Eating Bacteria
In my other post, link, I linked two references to articles where they talked about hydrogen sulfide, how it would build up and be released and such due to global warming, and it's ill effects(mass extinction).
Well, there are bacteria that consume hydrogen sulfide: link
"Home on the Bone: Some of Earth’s strangest creatures live around hydrothermal vents--hot springs that bubble from volcanic fissures in the ocean depths. These remarkable animals--tube worms, giant clams, and others--form a food chain that depends ultimately not on photosynthetic plants but on bacteria that live on and inside their bodies. The bacteria break down hydrogen sulfide in the vents, in the process releasing body-building energy for their hosts."
So, possibly, if the atmosphere got filled with hydrogen sulfide, you could have domes where there would be pools of these bacteria, effectively converting hydrogen sulfide in the atmosphere of the dome to energy for themselves.
Furthermore, if hydrogen sulfide began to build up, these organisms in time could populate the rest of the ocean, to clean up the hydrogen sulfide.
It wouldn't be immediate. It would take time. But these organisms could move in to take over the ocean waters. In the mean time, terrestial and sea life would take a hit.
So possibly, if we grew large quantities of this bacteria within domes, or greenhouses, we could survive while the rest of the world died. These bacteria could absorb the hydrogen sulfide from the water, which would absorb it from the air, to produce sulfur and hydrogen, which they'd use for food.
We could use these bacteria as a form of filter, keeping the H2S levels to survivable levels, while the rest of the world was gassed to death.
In a few years, maybe 10 or 15, we could go back outside, as the oceans would act as our filter, absorbing the hydrogen sulfide that it released, and using it as a food source.
The Earth would be a desert(thanks to deforestation, and the removal of most if not all vegetation), but thanks to extensive depopulation we wouldn't have to worry about water shortages, Peak Oil, climate change(we could go where it was still habitable, such as farther north), or global pandemics. Food would still be an issue, as the Earth would be a barren desert possibly.
Fertilizer wouldn't be a problem. All the infrastructure left by the deceased, and all the goods(fertilizer included) would last the small handful of survivors decades, if not hundreds of years.
What do you think? Do you think this idea has any merit?
Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 4:33 pm Post subject: Re: Hydrogen Sulfide May Have Caused Largest Extinction
From what I read in the Wikipedia entry, it seems to me that the events were in cascade. A massive, continuous eruption in the Siberian Traps shot CO2 in the atmosphere, which made temperatures spike, destabilising the clathrates, that poisoned the oceans and heated up the atmosphere even more, killing plants and animals, and eventually causing a hydrogen sulphide burst (the final strike).
What really scares me is that this could very easily happen again. We may not have continental-scale volcanism, but we have something just as good at spewing forth massive amounts of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere (industry). And the clathrates are there, waiting for the heat to go up just enough. <shudder>
Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 5:33 pm Post subject: Re: Hydrogen Sulfide May Have Caused Largest Extinction
Quote:
From what I read in the Wikipedia entry, it seems to me that the events were in cascade. A massive, continuous eruption in the Siberian Traps shot CO2 in the atmosphere, which made temperatures spike, destabilising the clathrates, that poisoned the oceans and heated up the atmosphere even more, killing plants and animals, and eventually causing a hydrogen sulphide burst (the final strike).
Again this is a theory and worse yet from Wikipedia where there is a history of biased editing. Almost any ideas on what caused the Permian extinction are equally valid, the evidence is sparse due to an incomplete rock record, uncertainties regarding the proxy information (isotope data from various sources) and large error bars on the chronometry. The only theory that can be argued against at this point in time is the meoterite one simply because there is a lack of any large scale irridium anamoly at the end of Permian.
Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 8:51 pm Post subject: Re: Hydrogen Sulfide May Have Caused Largest Extinction
In another post I had I have a possible small scale solution: link
I think that the H2S eating bacteria may overtake the ocean again and clear this stuff out once it saturates the atmosphere and the oceans(thus extinguishing a good deal of life before the bacteria that eats H2S takes hold and grows large enough to compensate for the increase in H2S).
So it's a matter of survival. However no amount of gas mask will be able to last you long enough, so I proposed a solution on how you could use pools of bacteria in greenhouses to act as your filter. Then you could just wait it out til nature cleans up the mess we've made.
It may take a few decades, but on the bright side you won't have much competition(that's also a bad thing). Certainly take care of the Peak Oil problem and the overpopulation problem.
Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 10:08 pm Post subject: Re: Hydrogen Sulfide May Have Caused Largest Extinction
That's true, but if it's in too small a concentration, then you can't ignite it.
You can burn the molecules that come in contact with the flame, but you wouldn't be able to burn all the molecules in the air, because if there aren't enough of them at one spot, then the heat energy produced by the burning of those molecules will be diluted by the other molecules floating around, decreasing the temperature to below the burning point of H2S.
But it would be nice to harvest this gas as a fuel supply. We might be able to do it too!
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 7:49 am Post subject: Re: Hydrogen Sulfide May Have Caused Largest Extinction
You ought to read '6 Degrees' by Mark Lynas, he speculates that a +6 deg C scenario may well turn into something like the PT extinction event and then uses a variety of scientific sources to go into detail about what it might have been like at that time.
It's really chilling stuff and if it were ever to play out then I wouldn't want to be around to see it.
Joined: Mar 04, 2005 Posts: 2642 Location: New Zealand
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 12:29 am Post subject: Re: Is the Hydrogen Age Just Around the Corner?
Thirst for hydrogen, but not a drop to drink
Quote:
At the recent National Hydrogen Association Conference in Sacramento, Calif., General Motors' vice-president for research and development challenged government and the oil industry to build 40 hydrogen refuelling stations in southern California to promote the further development of the "hydrogen infrastructure of automobiles."
According to Burns, a network of only 12,000 hydrogen stations would put hydrogen within 3.2 kilometres of 70 per cent of the U.S. population, a far more attainable goal than replacing all of the estimated 170,000 gasoline stations currently operating in the United States.
Even "if these stations cost $2 million each," Burns said, "the total cost of $24 billion is not overwhelming," considering the cumulative profits of the oil industry were $123 billion U.S. in 2007 alone.
Burns also said the production of hydrogen should not be a problem for the future, since global production is slated to rise to 81 billion kilograms by 2011, half of which is used by oil refineries to remove sulphur from "dirty" crude.
Not without irony, Burns notes the hydrogen being used to refine oil into gasoline would be enough to fuel 135 million fuel-cell powered vehicles, which would significantly reduce the world's dependency on fossil fuels.
Does ExxonMobile Have a Future in Hydrogen? _________________ Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe. H. G. Wells.
Fatih Birol's motto: leave oil before it leaves us.
Joined: Mar 04, 2005 Posts: 2642 Location: New Zealand
Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 8:21 pm Post subject: Re: Is the Hydrogen Age Just Around the Corner?
GM's Perspective on Hydrogen
Quote:
The automobile industry has reached a critical juncture in our journey to realize the full potential of hydrogen fuel cell-electric vehicles. While we have made impressive progress, we have now reached a point where the energy industry and governments must pick up their pace so we can continue to advance in a timely manner.
No other technology offers this exciting potential, and the automobile industry has made outstanding progress over the past decade to prove the potential is real.
Collectively, GM, Daimler, Chrysler, Honda, Toyota, and Ford have established an impressive list of industry-first benchmarks related to fuel cell vehicle performance, safety, range, speed, cold-start capability, durability, and functionality.
GM and Shell recently released a Hydrogen Fueling Infrastructure Assessment. This study identified ten key things people should know about a hydrogen infrastructure for automobiles.
* One: Today, more than 56 billion kilograms of hydrogen are produced globally each year. This amount is equal to what would be consumed by nearly 200 million fuel cell-electric vehicles! And, global hydrogen production is forecast to grow 45 percent to 81 billion kilograms by 2011. The point here is that the hydrogen industry is already a huge global industry with mature technology and an outstanding safety record.
* Two: About half of the global hydrogen production today is used at oil refineries. If this trend continues, by 2011, this will equate to roughly 135 million fuel cell vehicles, implying over 15 percent of the world's car parc could be energized by hydrogen already being produced for transportation. The point here is that an enormous amount of hydrogen is already being produced by energy companies as an affordable and necessary input into the production of gasoline. And, the irony is that as these companies work hard to perpetuate the petroleum economy, they are establishing significant capacity that can help to initiate the hydrogen economy.
* Three: A large hydrogen production site exists today near almost every major U.S. and European city. This means large quantities of hydrogen are already being produced close to where most Americans and Europeans live.
* Four: Numerous studies have shown that the near-term total cost-per-mile for hydrogen, when fueling stations are well-utilized, could be equivalent to $2-3 per gallon of gasoline (untaxed). Thus, at today's gasoline prices, hydrogen used in fuel cell vehicles at volume already appears to be cost competitive.
* Five: As more hydrogen becomes available for transportation, prices are projected to decrease further. The U.S. Department of Energy's long-term target cost for producing, distributing, and dispensing hydrogen is equivalent to $1.00-1.50 per gallon of gasoline (untaxed). DOE has identified several pathways in its Hydrogen Roadmap with the potential to meet this target.
fuelcellsworks _________________ Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe. H. G. Wells.
Fatih Birol's motto: leave oil before it leaves us.
Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 8:57 pm Post subject: Re: Hydrogen Sulfide May Have Caused Largest Extinction
rockdoc wrote:
"There are a number of theories for the Permian extinction...this is just one of about five or six I have read. Everything from volcanic activity to asteroid impact. Don't confuse theories with fact."
Well, yes, there are a number of theories that have been proposed over the years, but that doesn't make them all equally probable nor does it make them mutually exclusive.
After it became accepted that asteroid impact killed off the dinosaurs, such impacts became the assumed causes of all mass extinctions. But the harder scientists looked, the harder it was to find such impacts of the proper magnitude and in the right time frame to explain the other major die offs.
So while that has been a theory for Permian-Triassic extinction in the past, it is one that has been pretty much abandoned.
You might as well point out that besides string-theory and dark matter, there are also theories about phlogiston and world turtles that could explain patterns in the universe.
On top of this, these theories are not necessarily mutually exclusive. Ward and others think that great lava flows in Siberia released the CO2 that triggered further feedback loops which ended in the release of all that hydrogen sulfide.
(And as any historian of science will tell you, facts and theories do not have the simple hierarchical relationship your statement implies. Few "facts" are collected prior to there being a theory to test, so one could say that facts are as dependent on theories as theories are on facts.)
Joined: May 17, 2008 Posts: 49 Location: UK, Yorkshire
Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 1:47 pm Post subject: Re: solar power to hydrogen
Heineken wrote:
Hydrogen cars are simply not practical, and are out-of-sight expensive.
Most of the fundamental problems haven't been solved.
They are interesting curiosities and will so remain.
These people beg to differ: Hyrogen powered Ford Focus
The H can be generated from a domestic electroyser, powered by off peak electricity/solar pv, etc.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum