Peak Oil News

 

  Login or Register
 
Menu
 News
 Search
 Topics
 Stories Archive
 Submit News
 Discussions
 Code of Conduct
 Forums
 Forums Search
 Last 24 Hours
 PO 24hrs
 Peak Blog
 Resources
 About Us
 Downloads
 Web Links
 PeakWiki
 PeakPortal
 Focus Search
 Peak TV
 Peak Oil Boston
 Members
 Your Account
 Members List
 Ignore List
 JOIN!
 Private Messages
 
Light Sweet Crude Oil
 
google
 
PeakSpeak
NICKNAME

Download TeamSpeak
What is PeakSpeak?
Peak Oil on IRC
 
Member Quotes
Meanwhile, keep watching for shortage reports, because we should start seeing some sneak in this week, if our doom-o-meter is calibrated correctly.

pup55

Suggest Quote

 
Photo Album
Submit Photo
Peakoil.com is You!


member photos
 
ICM
Cisco & Net App Training
 
Peak Oil News: Forums

Peakoil.com :: View topic - Potential Nuclear Fuel Storage Disaster
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Potential Nuclear Fuel Storage Disaster
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Environment
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
EnergyUnlimited
Fission
Fission


Joined: May 15, 2006
Posts: 2989

PostPosted: Sat May 17, 2008 2:02 pm    Post subject: Re: Potential Nuclear Fuel Storage Disaster Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

rattleshirt wrote:
Yellowstone does not appear to have the total destruction radius stated above. Perhaps 200 miles not 2000. If you can survive the initial couple of years, it should, with planning, be possible to recover to what I consider an acceptable level...but then I think like Jack too much sometimes. Besides other than me who is going to be planning for such a thing?

I have red articles claiming that within 2000 miles nearly all higher life forms would be gone due to breathing in fine dust leading to lung destruction.
There are fossil records supporting that scenario.
So my claim of total destruction in physical sense was misleading.

BTW,
I am still convinced that Yellowstone's blast would exceed combined power of all nuclear arsenals by an order of magnitude at least, may be more...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rattleshirt
Tar Sands
Tar Sands


Joined: Oct 26, 2006
Posts: 94

PostPosted: Mon May 19, 2008 3:53 pm    Post subject: Re: Potential Nuclear Fuel Storage Disaster Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

ah, there's the difference-I have no intention of breathing the dust...nor of my animals doing so. regardless it is a terrifying prospect.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EnergyUnlimited
Fission
Fission


Joined: May 15, 2006
Posts: 2989

PostPosted: Wed May 21, 2008 1:39 am    Post subject: Re: Potential Nuclear Fuel Storage Disaster Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

rattleshirt wrote:
ah, there's the difference-I have no intention of breathing the dust...nor of my animals doing so. regardless it is a terrifying prospect.

Dust would be in air around for quite a long time, so it would not care about your intentions.

Particles in size range of few microns are also very difficult to filter off.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dohboi
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Dec 05, 2005
Posts: 1158

PostPosted: Wed May 21, 2008 8:52 am    Post subject: Re: Potential Nuclear Fuel Storage Disaster Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

I really do pity the modern promoters of nukes. They are facing massive problems of credibility. An earlier generation of promoters promised limitless, perfectly safe energy that would be so cheap, it wouldn't even need to be metered. Things did not quite turn out that way.

It is surprising how similar their claims are today. Good luck promoting this miserable industry. When you give up on this, maybe you can help the poor suckers trying to pomote "clean coal."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheDude
Expert
Expert


Joined: Apr 06, 2006
Posts: 2955
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia

PostPosted: Wed May 21, 2008 9:25 am    Post subject: Re: Potential Nuclear Fuel Storage Disaster Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Volcanoes helped create Yellowstone

Quote:
The Lava Creek eruption is a prime suspect in a worldwide catastrophe that almost drove the young human race to extinction. Scientists who study DNA, the elemental building blocks of human genetics, can trace changes in human DNA back to about 600,000 years ago. At that point, there seems to be a mystical starting point to what has become today's human DNA pool. There is a theory that this 600,000-year-old bottleneck in human DNA is a fingerprint of an enormous catastrophe that occurred at that time; 95 to 99 percent of all human life died off. The few humans who survived, and it could have been as few as 5,000 on the entire planet, became the breeding stock from which the rest of us have descended.

_________________
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
I'm just gonna find a cash machine.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rattleshirt
Tar Sands
Tar Sands


Joined: Oct 26, 2006
Posts: 94

PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2008 7:06 am    Post subject: Re: Potential Nuclear Fuel Storage Disaster Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

look I don't want yellowstone to erupt I just think that proper (excessive) planning can allow one to keep one people alive.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Environment All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Atom News FeedRSS 1.0 News FeedRSS 2.0 News FeedRSS Forums Feed