Don’t worry, just a little bump - $70 is just around the corner. Short traders just keep making those margin calls, mortgage the house if you have to. Fortunes await you! PO is for pansies and doomers. At $70 short some more ..... it is going back to $22 .... the world is awash with oil ........ reality has nothing to do with it, its all in those charts!!!!!!!!!!
Joined: Mar 29, 2008 Posts: 70 Location: Ashland,OR
Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 9:19 am Post subject: Re: Another Car runs on water hoax
Quote:
Most big automakers, meanwhile, are working on fuel-cell cars that run on hydrogen and emit -- not consume -- water.
Big dummies! Well heck, If the one car emits water, and the other one consumes it, you could just hook them up and drive forever.
Might look a little kinky...
Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 12:33 pm Post subject: Re: Another Car runs on water hoax
joelcolorado wrote:
Read the story. If the Japs do it, then its possible. They will take over the US automakers with this one.
WTF? Use your brain, man. They said a "generator" cracks the water into hydrogen. What energy source runs the generator? The car itself is a GWiz. It's a battery electric vehicle with a water "prop" in it. I.e. a scam.
Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 5:05 pm Post subject: Re: Another Car runs on water hoax
There are other ways to strip hydrogen from water besides electrolysis. I'm betting the chemical reaction they are referring to is consuming some other material, like aluminum, or something else that must be replaced frequently. It takes a great deal of energy to make aluminum. It is not perpetual motion. But I am not sure it will be cost effective either. There's just not enough information to properly evaluate this. _________________ The oil barrel is half-full.
Joined: May 02, 2005 Posts: 3266 Location: One more question...
Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 5:53 pm Post subject: Re: Another Car runs on water hoax
Find me another product that comes squirting out of the ground at 1000 psi or better, that also is amazingly dense with btus, and I'll get excited. Until then; it's just another way to move energy around(with losses at every exchange, of course) _________________ "Don't ever become a pessimist... a pessimist is correct oftener than an optimist, but an optimist has more fun, and neither can stop the march of events."
Robert A. Heinlein
Joined: Mar 28, 2005 Posts: 399 Location: Northern California, USA
Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 7:11 pm Post subject: Re: Another Car runs on water hoax
If you don't believe in free energy suppression this thing absolutely is impossible. The inventors should be thrown in prison for even making such claims and you can stop reading now.
However, if you choose to believe otherwise:
I don't know anybody important, I just click around, watch youtube and read conspiracy websites. You can basically get the gist of everything I know by watching the Project Camelot Benjamin Fulford videos on youtube. It's 3 hours long so I'm not going to attempt to regurgitate it here.
Anyway the short of the news is that there has been a global agreement to suppress free energy, and now, for various reasons, the Asians are in the process of breaking from the agreement.
Isn't it curious that one of Japan's leading nuclear physicists recently gave a cold fusion demo? There should be more big announcements out of China in the near future in coordination with the Olympics.
Joined: Apr 13, 2005 Posts: 2850 Location: St.Louis, Mo
Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 8:58 pm Post subject: Re: Another Car runs on water hoax
Why Doesn't Water Burn?
Every first year chemistry student knows that water is composed of two parts hydrogen and one part oxygen. That’s what that “H-two-oh” thing is all about.
In our chemistry classes, we also learned that hydrogen is just about the most combustible thing out there. You know the story of the Hindenburg and “Oh the humanity” and all that.
And we also learned that three things are needed to create a fire: fuel, oxygen, and heat.
And any third grader knows that you can put out a fire by pouring water over it.
Waitammint. Am I the only one to see a paradox here? You put out a fire by pouring two-thirds of the formula for fire on it? Gee, it seems like water should be a tinderbox, just waiting for a match to turn it into a lighter-than air blazing inferno.
What gives? Well, if you just sorta mixed up the hydrogen and oxygen then, yeah, you’d have a ball of gas that’s ready to light up like a Kuwait oil field. But that’s not what water is. The hydrogen and oxygen form together at the molecular level.
In a union that is only fully understood by God, atoms can bond together to form something completely different — something that didn’t exist before. Something that that has absolutely no characteristics of the original raw materials.
God allows us to use electrolysis to break the hydrogen and oxygen apart. But He bonds them together so tightly that it usually requires more energy to break them up than what is yielded in fuel. When God sticks things together, He generally doesn’t mess around.
In the book of Second Corinthians, the Apostle Paul tells us that “if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature”. The implication is that we are made into a new species, literally something that never existed before, something that has no characteristics of the original raw material.
I guess God knows what He’s doing. After all, He can take the most perfect fuel in the universe and turn it into a pretty good fire extinguisher.
Joined: Oct 27, 2004 Posts: 220 Location: Queensland, Australia
Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 9:56 pm Post subject: Re: Another Car runs on water hoax
Actually the science show on our public radio discussed a hydrogen producing water burner, effectively as a way of debunking water burning. All they are looking for now is alternatives to the current reactants.
Very close to pure demineralised water, 1 kg of Aluminium for each ~ 2 kilos of water, some Magnesium, Paladium and a sustaining electrical current. So to get about 500 grams of Hydrogen they burn, around $3000 of precious and processed metals. Of course the reaction also runs at around 1600 degrees and must apparently not flash to steam. So super high temperature and pressure as well as massively expensive.
Apparently you can also burn Corundum at the rate of 4 kilos per 100 grams of hydrogen. Most people know corundum as Sapphire and Ruby. Of course you have to synthetically create pure corundum to burn in this way. I expect a cost in the order of $200 000 per hundred grams of hydrogen, with massive energy inputs and just as dangerous reaction as the one above.
Neither of these Methods of burning water seems economically or energetically sustainable.
All times are GMT - 6 Hours Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4Next
Page 1 of 4
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum