Joined: Sep 16, 2007 Posts: 1350 Location: Oklahoma City, USA
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 2:42 pm Post subject: Re: Karzai Threatens To Invade Pakistan
I bet Musharraf has been buying oil with Euros. The last guy who did that was named Saddam, and he didn't fare too well.
Or else India has been doing some heavy duty bribing. India would make out like a bandit if Pakistan was taken down a notch.
I can't see any other reasons for NATO to go after a nuclear power (which Pakistan is; they make Iran look like a three year old with a squirt gun). _________________ Conservation is conservative
It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the ones most responsive to change. -- Charles Darwin
Joined: May 27, 2007 Posts: 1486 Location: The Post Peak Oil Historian
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 12:16 am Post subject: Re: Karzai Threatens To Invade Pakistan
Pakistan vows to defend sovereignty after Karzai threat
Pakistan has warned it will not tolerate any violations of its borders.
Pakistani Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gillani said, "Neither do we interfere in anyone else's matters, nor will we allow anyone to interfere in our territorial limits and our affairs."
Pakistan's foreign office pledged that the country would defend its territorial sovereignty, state media said Monday.
link _________________ In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. - George Orwell
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 1:33 am Post subject: Re: Karzai Threatens To Invade Pakistan
So, a guy that has enough problems controlling a city let alone a country is going to invade the territory of another country with 5 times the population and nuclear weapons.
Pehaps he should send in Bill Murray and the cast from Stripes.
Joined: Mar 09, 2006 Posts: 476 Location: Al-Mariyya, Al-Andalus
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 9:27 am Post subject: Re: Karzai Threatens To Invade Pakistan
You should take into account the fact that Karzai is the American stooge here, they've practically lost their stooge in Pakistan although I believe Azari, the de facto head of the fragile government (Bhutto's widower) is their agent. When Karzai speaks, he is using a script, everybody in the region knows this. The Pakistanis are aware of the US designs to get ground troops on their soil, effectively surrounding Iran with forces and allowing an extension of Iraq and Afgfhanistan-like military strikes both in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Karzai is the Mayor of Kabul, he controlls precisely nothing and represents himself, his family and his business interests. However, he provides an excellent excuse for US troops (in the guise of NATO) to perform murderous incursions into Pakistani territory, something they are itching to do. In fact, they're already doing it, but the media black out is rather effective.
Joined: Apr 08, 2008 Posts: 118 Location: Montreal
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 1:39 pm Post subject: Re: Taliban Prison Break
something to ponder about-
Quote:
Experts in regional affairs believe that Taliban militants attacked the Kandahar prison with the green light from US forces.
They say it is questionable - how could the militants dare attack the prison with US-led troops stationed just northeast of the jail?
The sources also noted that although clashes between Afghan security forces and the militants lasted for several hours, US-led troops did not intervene.
Ordinary people share the idea, asking how is it possible that hundreds of militants could attack a government prison, detonating more than 800 kilograms of explosives and foreign forces show no reaction.
They say the blasts were deafening and awakened everyone in the region. No one can claim not being aware of the attack.
"There are two opinions among Afghans following up the attack; non-political individuals say the Taliban managed to attack the prison with the help of God, while those more political believe that US forces helped them," Ahmad Saadat, a political expert, said. http://www.presstv.com/detail.aspx?id=60249§ionid=351020403
Joined: May 27, 2007 Posts: 1486 Location: The Post Peak Oil Historian
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 9:35 am Post subject: NATO faces critical battle in Afghanistan
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization is facing its most serious threat since the end of the cold war as the Taliban are clearly on the counterattack and taking the offensive in Afghanistan. After organizing a spectacular jailbreak at the weekend during which several hundreds of Taliban militants escaped, the insurgents blew up bridges near Kandahar hoping to deter a possible counter-offensive by Afghan and NATO troops.
NATO can ill-afford to allow the Taliban a victory. The great danger in the Afghan campaign is that the Western nations currently contributing troops to the war effort will lose interest and withdraw. This is precisely what the Taliban hopes to achieve in prolonging the campaign and gradually raising the number of casualties among NATO forces, which in turn they believe will bring pressure on the respective governments back home, and eventually forcing them to withdraw their forces.
"There were Taliban everywhere. They have destroyed all of the small bridges leading to the villages," a local resident told the French news agency, AFP.
The presence of about 70,000 international troops mainly operating under NATO does not seem to discourage the insurgency, aimed at overthrowing the U.S.-backed government in Kabul. A movement that has grown in intensity over the past two years with the Taliban coming more brazen in recent months, launching a raid on a five-star hotel in January and opening fire on a televised military parade attended by Karzai in April.
Allowing the Taliban a victory in Afghanistan will reset the anti-terrorist clock back to zero.
A Taliban commander named Mullah Ahmedullah called an Associated Press reporter on Tuesday and said that around 400 Taliban moved into Arghandab from Khakrez, one district to the north. He said some of the militants released in Friday's prison break had joined the assault.
"They told us, 'We want to fight until the death,'" Ahmedullah said. "We've occupied most of the area and it's a good place for fighting. Now we are waiting for the NATO and Afghan forces."
The U.S. and NATO have pleaded for additional troops over the last year and now have some 65,000 in the country. But the militants are still finding successes that the international alliance can't counter.
Haji Ibrahim Khan said Taliban fighters were moving through several Arghandab villages with weapons on their shoulders, planting mines and destroying small bridges.
"They told us to leave the area within 24 hours because they want to fight foreign and Afghan troops," Khan said.
Joined: Aug 03, 2007 Posts: 3771 Location: Boston Suburbs
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 10:31 am Post subject: Re: NATO faces critical battle in Afghanistan
NATO faces critical battle in Afghanistan...
Tolerating Cid's posted links. _________________ Paranoia is demonstrated to be an infectious disease, and stupidity plus the internet its major vector.
Joined: Mar 09, 2006 Posts: 476 Location: Al-Mariyya, Al-Andalus
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 11:23 pm Post subject: Re: NATO faces critical battle in Afghanistan
This fellow has the truth:
Quote:
OPEN WARFARE
The U.S. and its allies are edging into open warfare against Pakistan. The western occupation army in Afghanistan is unable to defeat Taliban fighters due to its lack of combat troops. The outgoing supreme commander, U.S. Gen. Dan McNeill, recently admitted he would need 400,000 soldiers to pacify Afghanistan.
Unable to win in Afghanistan, the frustrated western powers are turning on Pakistan, a nation of 165 million. Pakistanis are bitterly opposed to the U.S.-led war in Afghanistan and their nation's subjugation to U.S. policy under dictator Musharraf.
"We just need to occupy Pakistan's tribal territory," insists the Pentagon, "to stop its Pashtun tribes from supporting and sheltering Taliban." But a U.S.-led invasion of FATA simply will push pro-Taliban Pashtun militants deeper into Pakistan's Northwest Frontier province, drawing western troops ever deeper into Pakistan. Already overextended, western forces will be stretched even thinner and clashes with Pakistan's tough regular army may be inevitable.
Widening the Afghan War into Pakistan is military stupidity on a grand scale, and political madness. But Washington and its obedient allies seem hell-bent on charging into a wider regional war that no number of heavy bombers will win.
Joined: May 27, 2007 Posts: 1486 Location: The Post Peak Oil Historian
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 1:56 am Post subject: Re: NATO faces critical battle in Afghanistan
Pak: Taliban seize 3 US military choppers
Taliban militants in Pakistan's restive tribal belt captured three US military choppers while they were being shipped in a dismantled state from Peshawar to Jalalabad in Afghanistan and sold one of the helicopters for several hundred thousand dollars, a media report said todays.
Pakistani officials confirmed the development while the US embassy spokesperson refused to comment.
Some diplomats in Islamabad were aware of the Taliban operation but were not ready to speak on record. One of the hijacked helicopters had already been sold to an unidentified customer in Afghanistan, the report said.
The components of the helicopters arrived in containers at the Karachi Port and were taken by road to Peshawar. The containers then entered the tribal areas for the journey to Afghanistan.
When the containers entered the restive Khyber Agency, Taliban stopped the convoys and took away the helicopter components. Pakistani paramilitary forces tried to confront the Taliban but 'suffered heavy losses due to darkness'.
The incident happened in the same area where Pakistan's ambassador to Afghanistan Tariq Azizuddin was kidnapped in February this year.
A Chinook heavy lift chopper and a Black Hawk multi-role helicopter were captured recently while a Cobra gunship helicopter was hijacked some weeks ago.
When the Taliban first captured the Cobra helicopter, they filmed all the stolen components and supplied a CD to their allies in Afghanistan. Certain people in Farah province of western Afghanistan 'showed an interest in purchasing the Cobra helicopter and subsequently its parts were smuggled to Farah', the report said.
'Taliban sold this Cobra to an unidentified customer for several hundred thousand dollars,' it said.
Following the latest hijacking, Taliban have filmed all the stolen components of the Chinook and Black Hawk helicopters. The Taliban have sent the CD 'for attracting customers from neighbouring countries of Afghanistan'.
Top US military officials have demanded that Pakistan should 'start an operation in the tribal areas for the recovery of their stolen helicopters'.
They expressed concern that instead of initiating an operation against the Taliban, the new government is negotiating peace with the militants, the report said.
Who's bright idea was it, to ship these through a Taliban controlled province? _________________ In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. - George Orwell
Joined: Mar 09, 2006 Posts: 476 Location: Al-Mariyya, Al-Andalus
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 7:57 am Post subject: Re: NATO faces critical battle in Afghanistan
Cid, that whole report is just downright funny.
Quote:
They expressed concern that instead of initiating an operation against the Taliban, the new government is negotiating peace with the militants, the report said.
And that is the only way this will end. Both the previous regime and this 'new' government know the Taleban better than the invaders, and they are all related, and they know the only way to attain peace is through negotiation. Imagine, the Pak military, supposedly US trained, lost a sqirmish 'because it was dark': the truth is, they recognised their cousins and had a sudden loss of will to fight.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum