Peak Oil News

 

  Login or Register
 
Menu
 News
 Search
 Topics
 Stories Archive
 Submit News
 Discussions
 Code of Conduct
 Forums
 Forums Search
 Last 24 Hours
 PO 24hrs
 Peak Blog
 Resources
 About Us
 Downloads
 Web Links
 PeakWiki
 PeakPortal
 Focus Search
 Peak TV
 Peak Oil Boston
 Members
 Your Account
 Members List
 Ignore List
 JOIN!
 Private Messages
 
google
 
PeakSpeak
NICKNAME

Download TeamSpeak
What is PeakSpeak?
Peak Oil on IRC
 
Photo Album
Submit Photo
Peakoil.com is You!


member photos
 
Light Sweet Crude Oil
 
Member Quotes
I want my mommy!

Buggy

Suggest Quote

 
aspo08
 
ICM
Cisco & Net App Training
 
Peak Oil News: Forums

Peakoil.com :: View topic - GM, Ford, and Chrysler Death Watch Thread
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

GM, Ford, and Chrysler Death Watch Thread
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 10, 11, 12  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Current Events
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Revi
Fusion
Fusion


Joined: Apr 25, 2005
Posts: 3255
Location: Maine

PostPosted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 5:55 am    Post subject: Re: GM, Ford, and Chrysler Death Watch Thread Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

A friend went to trade his late model explorer for an echo. He was offered $100 for the trade. SUV's are going for at least $2000 under kelly blue book price now. That's obviously too high, because even at substantial discounts there are no buyers.

We need a new bumper sticker.

Dummies drive SUV's.

You would have to be brain dead to buy most of the cars the big three are offering.
_________________
Deep in the mud and slime of things, even there, something sings.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
hope_full
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: May 27, 2008
Posts: 235

PostPosted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 6:20 am    Post subject: Re: GM, Ford, and Chrysler Death Watch Thread Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Last week, I was told that my husband's 2002 Ford F150 extended cab truck (with all the bells and whistles and in nice condition) had ZERO value as a trade-in on a new car. The dealer suggested I donate it to charity.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
frankthetank
Fusion
Fusion


Joined: Sep 16, 2004
Posts: 4451
Location: Southwest WI

PostPosted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 7:26 am    Post subject: Re: GM, Ford, and Chrysler Death Watch Thread Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

MY bro has a 2000 Suburban that he would like to get rid of! Funny. I told him he can give it to me and i'll use it to haul wood. I'll cut off part of the roof so i can load it from the top. The heated leather seats can dry the wood as we fly down the highway getting 10mpg. He did have a good point, he said its probably worth more as scrap.

You could easily get a couple hundred scrap for a big truck. Take of the caddy converters for some more moolah.
_________________
"Oil is going up because we use too much oil, and the capacity to replace reserves is dwindling"
-President Bush 11/07/07
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Roy
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude


Joined: Jun 18, 2004
Posts: 765
Location: Western North Carolina

PostPosted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 7:43 am    Post subject: Re: GM, Ford, and Chrysler Death Watch Thread Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Yessir scrap value.

My neighbor scrapped a 96 Isuzu Trooper. He got $135 for the cat, $60 for the AC condenser, $75 for the radiator, $200 for the aluminum wheels, and another $350 for the rest of it the body. A place 30 miles away also gives $150 for any engine and $150 for any transmission so he took the drivetrain there.

Total = $1120

he said he couldn't have sold it for more than $600 as a running vehicle.

Also I notice that people's yard ornaments, I mean junked cars, are disappearing round these parts. This being a not so rich area that used to have lots of yard ornaments....

I saw a very restorable (straight body little rust) 1962 Falcon Sprint on the back of a truck headed into the scrap yard. What a shame.

Dan that was an outstanding analysis of the current big three situation and I agree 100%.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lawnchair
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude


Joined: Oct 20, 2004
Posts: 771

PostPosted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 8:22 am    Post subject: Re: GM, Ford, and Chrysler Death Watch Thread Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

In a less regulated country, there would be great uses for an SUV.

Dodge Durango V8 should be able to carry 1500 pounds and tow 5500.

5 pax in the SUV (consider it first class), and build a trailer with seating for 20.

Even getting 5 miles per gallon with the combo, you'd still be at 125 pax*miles/gallon... more efficient than (diesel-based) railroads have ever been.

It's just that very few people actually tax the resources of their truck.

I have a truck that only gets about 2500 miles a year on it. Fortunately, my driving record is flawless and I'm in a low-risk area, so it's cheap to keep it insured. Expect the insurance companies to start advertising ultra-low-mileage multi-vehicle plans more, as people keep their trucks and SUVs, but drive them less.
_________________
At 1% annual growth, human bodies will incorporate every gram in the observable universe in approximately 10,170 years.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mobil1
Tar Sands
Tar Sands


Joined: Jun 20, 2008
Posts: 67
Location: Quebec/Ottawa, Canada

PostPosted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 8:24 am    Post subject: Re: GM, Ford, and Chrysler Death Watch Thread Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Roy wrote:
Yessir scrap value.

Also I notice that people's yard ornaments, I mean junked cars, are disappearing round these parts. This being a not so rich area that used to have lots of yard ornaments....


So they are being scrapped for scrap value ?

Canadian gov't is working on a plan to pay $1k or so for 1995 and earlier vehicles to scrap them, as long as they are road driveable and licenced and insured for the last year or so. BC provincial gov't already has a plan in place.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
evilgenius
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude


Joined: Dec 06, 2005
Posts: 853
Location: Stopped at the border.

PostPosted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 10:32 am    Post subject: Re: GM, Ford, and Chrysler Death Watch Thread Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

mobil1 wrote:
Roy wrote:
Yessir scrap value.

Also I notice that people's yard ornaments, I mean junked cars, are disappearing round these parts. This being a not so rich area that used to have lots of yard ornaments....


So they are being scrapped for scrap value ?

Canadian gov't is working on a plan to pay $1k or so for 1995 and earlier vehicles to scrap them, as long as they are road driveable and licenced and insured for the last year or so. BC provincial gov't already has a plan in place.


That must happen in the US too either through taxes or incentives.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Roy
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude


Joined: Jun 18, 2004
Posts: 765
Location: Western North Carolina

PostPosted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 10:48 am    Post subject: Re: GM, Ford, and Chrysler Death Watch Thread Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

The primary incentive in the case of my neighbor is getting the max $$ he could out of an otherwise running vehicle that he didn't need.

It was worth almost double as scrap compared to what it was worth as a drivable vehicle.

I was shocked that he got as much as he did. Just goes to show you what is happening to the price of raw materials.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
frankthetank
Fusion
Fusion


Joined: Sep 16, 2004
Posts: 4451
Location: Southwest WI

PostPosted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 11:24 am    Post subject: Re: GM, Ford, and Chrysler Death Watch Thread Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

lawnchair-

I totally agree. On the flip side, people drive automobiles that have WAY too much torque/hp then they need. I pull a 16ft boat/motor/trailer that totals around 1000pounds no problem with a car that has a little over 100 hp/same amt of torque. I'm sure i could easily tow 1200 or 1300 pounds if i wanted. This while still getting 20+mpg (roughly 25 or so when pulling the boat).

I would love to see a setup like that. You'd need a big trailer to haul a 100 people. Maybe put tall sides on it and make them stand. Be funny as hell to see in winter.
_________________
"Oil is going up because we use too much oil, and the capacity to replace reserves is dwindling"
-President Bush 11/07/07
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jdmartin
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude


Joined: May 19, 2005
Posts: 797
Location: Merry Ol' USA

PostPosted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 11:55 am    Post subject: Re: GM, Ford, and Chrysler Death Watch Thread Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

frankthetank wrote:


I would love to see a setup like that. You'd need a big trailer to haul a 100 people. Maybe put tall sides on it and make them stand. Be funny as hell to see in winter.


Laughing Great idea, I'd love to see it as well. Kind of a new-age people hauler. I bet cattle'd get a kick out of it: "Gee, it's nice to see them hauling off a load of people to the slaughterhouse for a change". Laughing
_________________
After fueling up their cars, Twyman says they bowed their heads and asked God for cheaper gas.There was no immediate answer, but he says other motorists joined in and the service station owner didn't run them off.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
crossthread
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: 179

PostPosted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 12:31 pm    Post subject: Re: GM, Ford, and Chrysler Death Watch Thread Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

U.S. stocks fell sharply Thursday with the blue-chip index enduring its worst June so far since 1930, and plunging to its lowest finish since Sept. 11, 2006, after getting slammed hard as crude soared to new highs and Goldman Sachs disparaged U.S. brokers and advised selling General Motors Corp.


"We're going to move in the opposite direction of oil, and General Motors is going to go out of business, at least according to Goldman Sachs," said Art Hogan, chief market strategist at Jefferies & Co.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hawkcreek
Expert
Expert


Joined: Aug 15, 2004
Posts: 967

PostPosted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 1:33 pm    Post subject: Re: GM, Ford, and Chrysler Death Watch Thread Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

--
_________________
"It don't make no sense that common sense don't make no sense no more"
John Prine


Last edited by Hawkcreek on Sat Jul 19, 2008 5:53 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
frankthetank
Fusion
Fusion


Joined: Sep 16, 2004
Posts: 4451
Location: Southwest WI

PostPosted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:12 pm    Post subject: Re: GM, Ford, and Chrysler Death Watch Thread Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Hawk-

I agree with you 100%, but if you don't have any money, how are you suppose to pay? A family member (through marriage) works for Chrysler here in WI. I haven't talked to him lately, but next time i'll have to see how things are. I know he was going to take a buyout or something last time i saw him. I know his wife works retail and i doubt has anything for retirement...i'm guessing both are counting on his.

If your an employee with a little common sense, i think the writing has been on the walls for a few years.

The worse part is the upper management clowns that still get paid gobs of money to destroy a company. Nothing new here in the land of the free, home of the brave.
_________________
"Oil is going up because we use too much oil, and the capacity to replace reserves is dwindling"
-President Bush 11/07/07
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Denny
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Jul 10, 2004
Posts: 1645
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 4:55 pm    Post subject: Re: GM, Ford, and Chrysler Death Watch Thread Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Dan1195 wrote:
Their most obvious mistake is that that they all assumed 3-4 years ago that the initial rises in the price of oil were temporary. This widely held belief was combined with the booming sales of large trucks and SUV's by a general public that likewise believed this to be the case. ..
Due to the significant lead time between initial concepts of models and model improvements and the availability of said model in their showroom, most stuff on the lot today was meant for $1.50/gallon gasoline.


Well, I recall hearing how Chrysler at least had fitured how to bring a vehicle from concption on the "drawing board" - actually a CAD screen - into physical production in like 2.5 - 3 years. I recall Lee Iacocca bragging about that way back int he late 80's. So, what we are seeing today as "new" was conceived about the time of Hurricane Katrina. With all their crackerjack economists and deft executive talent, you say they could not have foreseen peak oil? Hell, I knew about peak oil back in 2002 when the Globe and Mail Report on Business magazine had a long article about it, which I researched and came to see the light. I am just regular engineer, not a multi-million a year executive. So, how could I have seen it, and they did not?

They must have been asleep at the switch or something.

By the way, reading that article was maybe the best hour investment of my time ever. It has given me so much insight into market expectations. It has led me to put my limited investments into the right places and take a modest pool of savings into something to retire on.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lawnchair
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude


Joined: Oct 20, 2004
Posts: 771

PostPosted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 7:54 pm    Post subject: Re: GM, Ford, and Chrysler Death Watch Thread Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Denny wrote:
With all their crackerjack economists and deft executive talent, you say they could not have foreseen peak oil? Hell, I knew about peak oil back in 2002 when the Globe and Mail Report on Business magazine had a long article about it, which I researched and came to see the light. I am just regular engineer, not a multi-million a year executive. So, how could I have seen it, and they did not?

They must have been asleep at the switch or something.


Chrysler is an embarrassment right now, and on death's door. Walk into a Chrysler showroom today, and the most efficient vehicle they can show you (a Caliber) gets not a whit better gas mileage than a carbureted 1981 Aries K-Car. Except that the K-Car was actually a pretty roomy 5 passenger car (and was available as a wagon). The Caliber, not so much.

That's not to say they weren't making plans for an oil crunch. Five years ago, DaimlerChrysler expected that by today, every Dodge showroom in Podunk, Middle America would sell and warranty the Daimler Smart car, as well as a lineup of smaller captive imports from China (probably Chery Automotive).

Both those deals fell through, for many reasons, leaving Chrysler to sell the bigger vehicles (that they had planned to keep making in North America), and scrambling to put together some warmed-over crap in the car market. Had both deals succeeded, Chrysler (as a very different company) would be doing better than the rest right now.
_________________
At 1% annual growth, human bodies will incorporate every gram in the observable universe in approximately 10,170 years.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Current Events All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 10, 11, 12  Next
Page 3 of 12

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Atom News FeedRSS 1.0 News FeedRSS 2.0 News FeedRSS Forums Feed