Peak Oil News

 

  Login or Register
 
Menu
 News
 Search
 Topics
 Stories Archive
 Submit News
 Discussions
 Code of Conduct
 Forums
 Forums Search
 Last 24 Hours
 PO 24hrs
 Peak Blog
 Ask Jane
 Resources
 About Us
 Downloads
 Web Links
 PeakWiki
 PeakPortal
 Focus Search
 Peak TV
 Peak Oil Boston
 Houston Peak Oil
 Members
 Your Account
 Members List
 Ignore List
 JOIN!
 Private Messages
 
Sponsor Links
 
PeakSpeak
NICKNAME

Download TeamSpeak
What is PeakSpeak?
Peak Oil on IRC
 
Photo Album
Submit Photo
Peakoil.com is You!


member photos
 
Light Sweet Crude Oil
 
Member Quotes
We are entering the stage where ideology and education about sustainability and living within carrying capacity will be augmented by the reality of identifiable consequences of our overshoot. External consequences like the peaking and decline of below ground energy and commodity resources, above ground environmental degradation of our climate, soils, fisheries and climate will have a profound effect on our culture. 2009 is the year when we start to feel it.

Ibon

Suggest Quote

 
ICM
Cisco & Net App Training
 
Peak Oil News: Forums

Peakoil.com :: View topic - Titan's surface organics surpass oil reserves on Earth
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Titan's surface organics surpass oil reserves on Earth
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Peak Oil Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
heroineworshipper
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude


Joined: Jul 14, 2006
Posts: 759
Location: Calif*

PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 7:44 pm    Post subject: Re: NASA: 300 Trillion Barrels of Proven Hydrocarbon Reserve Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

There definitely wouldn't be any more oxygen if all that was burned. Just need a way to siphon it from 1 billion miles away.
_________________
People first, then things, then dollars.
There will be enslavement, cannibalism, & zombie invasions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
neocone
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Sep 23, 2006
Posts: 269

PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 8:18 pm    Post subject: Re: NASA: 300 Trillion Barrels of Proven Hydrocarbon Reserve Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Thread already done here:

http://www.peakoil.com/fortopic36550.html

Problem is... you need a helluva lotsa barrels of energy to get ONE BARREL OF THAT SOURCE.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Serial_Worrier
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Jun 05, 2008
Posts: 350

PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 1:10 pm    Post subject: Re: Titan's surface organics surpass oil reserves on Earth Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Yay! Let's suck Titan dry, then on to the next planet/moon we can suck dry. "The Matrix" pegged humanity perfectly.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nobodypanic
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude


Joined: Jun 02, 2008
Posts: 686

PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:44 pm    Post subject: Re: Titan's surface organics surpass oil reserves on Earth Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Serial_Worrier wrote:
Yay! Let's suck Titan dry, then on to the next planet/moon we can suck dry. "The Matrix" pegged humanity perfectly.

IIRC, hydrocarbons are a renewable resource on titan.

aside from that, i don't get the disgust you're displaying w/respect to acquiring resources from space.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jenab6
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude


Joined: Dec 25, 2005
Posts: 613
Location: Hillsboro, West Virginia

PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 9:28 pm    Post subject: Re: Titan's surface organics surpass oil reserves on Earth Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

BigTex wrote:
No, no, no, this can work... Problem solved.

No, it can't work, either. The fundamental problem is the fact that more energy is required, in even the most favorable shipping scenario, for making the delta-vees (particularly that for Earth arrival) than could be recovered by burning any hydrocarbon cargo.

Saturn's perihelion distance is 9.05 AU. The best Saturn-to-Earth Hohmann transfer orbit would have a semimajor axis of
a = (9.05+1)/2 = 5.03 AU
The sun-relative speed of a cargo ship following that transfer orbit, at its arrival at Earth's orbit, would be

GM = 1.32712440018E+20 m^3 sec^-2
AU = 1.49597870691E+11 meters
v = sqrt{(GM/AU) (2 - 1/5.03)} = 53648 m/s

Assume that the cargo ship is playing catch-up with Earth, a condition that minimizes the energy needed for the cargo ship to make orbital rendezvous with Earth. Earth's orbital speed is

ve = sqrt(GM/AU) = 29784 m/s

The difference is

dv'' = v-ve = 23864 m/s

Now, Earth's gravity will speed up the cargo ship somewhat on approach. On the other hand, the cargo ship doesn't have to come to a full stop, relative to Earth, since it's bound for a parking orbit. The speed up from Earth's gravity is a conservation of energy problem. Let's assume the parking orbit has an altitude of 1000 kilometers.

R = Re + 1000 km = 7378000 meters
GMe = 3.986E+14 m^3 sec^-2
dv' = sqrt{ (dv'')^2 + 2GMe/R }
dv' = 26030 m/s

However, the circular orbit speed around Earth will be

vc = sqrt{GMe/R} = 7350 m/s

So the delta-vee needed to park the cargo ship, arriving from Saturn via transfer orbit, has a minimum of

dv = dv' - vc = 18680 m/s

Roughly estimated, of course.

Now, how much energy is required to accelerate a kilogram of payload to 18680 m/s, assuming that the fuel itself has no mass?

E = (1/2) (1 kg) (18680 m/s)^2 = 1.745E+8 Joules

The energy from burning 1 kilogram of gasoline is 4.5E+7 Joules, which is only about 1/4 of what you'd have to spend to slow that kilogram of gasoline down at the arrival end of the transfer orbit. And that's assuming that you have a massless fuel and a massless cargo ship superstructure. It also neglects the energy used in the departure delta-vee at the Saturn end of the transfer.

So forget bringing Titan hydrocarbons to Earth. Costs too much.

Jerry Abbott
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
joelcolorado
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude


Joined: May 25, 2008
Posts: 683

PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 9:36 pm    Post subject: Re: Titan's surface organics surpass oil reserves on Earth Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Okay I got it. I was out the other night and someone pointed out TITAN to me. I noticed it was uphill from the earth. Knowing something about syphoning, this is gonna be easy as fluids will run downhill once you get them started.

The current use of oil is like a giant suction they say, sucking the reserves dry, so we can use that suction to start the syphon and we can then use all the free fuel from TITAN
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jenab6
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude


Joined: Dec 25, 2005
Posts: 613
Location: Hillsboro, West Virginia

PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:21 pm    Post subject: Re: Titan's surface organics surpass oil reserves on Earth Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

joelcolorado wrote:
Okay I got it. I was out the other night and someone pointed out TITAN to me. I noticed it was uphill from the earth. Knowing something about syphoning, this is gonna be easy as fluids will run downhill once you get them started. The current use of oil is like a giant suction they say, sucking the reserves dry, so we can use that suction to start the syphon and we can then use all the free fuel from TITAN

Well, you can get Titan hydrocarbons to Earth without braking on arrival. The thing is, you sort of have to use the Earth itself as the stopper and find a way to make use of the impact energy (a hydrogen bomb's worth or so) which will all be released as heat the instant the cargo ship crashes.

Here's my tutorial on targeting Earth with an asteroid moving in an elliptical transfer orbit.
http://jenab6.livejournal.com/12053.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ReducedToZero
Tar Sands
Tar Sands


Joined: Jun 29, 2008
Posts: 83
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA / San Jose, CA

PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:50 pm    Post subject: Re: Titan's surface organics surpass oil reserves on Earth Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

I got a crazy idea... Lets use that big ass bright thing 150 million miles away.... starting 50 years ago!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
joelcolorado
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude


Joined: May 25, 2008
Posts: 683

PostPosted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 8:15 am    Post subject: Re: Titan's surface organics surpass oil reserves on Earth Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

I am going to use a hose so that we can put a valve on it and regulate how much we get here. Walmart has them on clearance this week.
hahha

Yes, too bad we have not harnessed the sun. Good grief.
My friend has a passive solar house and its NICE and henever has a heating bill all winter. Has to vent it as it gets TOO hot. If every house built from now on was like that, we would elimnate the need for heating over time.

That is just a simple OLD type solar heat. There are newer and could be better ways out there in the future if we WANTED to do it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Serial_Worrier
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Jun 05, 2008
Posts: 350

PostPosted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 11:54 am    Post subject: Re: Titan's surface organics surpass oil reserves on Earth Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

No I am addicted to hydrocarbons and I say let's suck every last drop out of TITAN. Razz

Might as well face it, we're addicted to oil!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pstarr
Expert
Expert


Joined: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 7369
Location: Behind the Redwood Curtain

PostPosted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 11:19 pm    Post subject: Re: Titan's surface organics surpass oil reserves on Earth Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

nobodypanic wrote:
Serial_Worrier wrote:
Yay! Let's suck Titan dry, then on to the next planet/moon we can suck dry. "The Matrix" pegged humanity perfectly.

IIRC, hydrocarbons are a renewable resource on titan.

aside from that, i don't get the disgust you're displaying w/respect to acquiring resources from space.
It takes energy to get into space. Saturn Five rocket burned 15 tons of propellant every second lifting off.

You need to study eroei, net energy, etc. if you want to have an intelligent conversation around here. Use the search button up top.
_________________
"The greatest shortcoming of the human race is our inability to understand the exponential function."
--Dr. Albert A. Bartlett, Emeritus Professor of Physics, University of Colorado; World Population Balance Board of Advisors
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nobodypanic
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude


Joined: Jun 02, 2008
Posts: 686

PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 1:01 pm    Post subject: Re: Titan's surface organics surpass oil reserves on Earth Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

MonsieurX wrote:
nobodypanic wrote:
hydrocarbons are a renewable resource on titan.

On Earth too.

excellent point.

now if they would only rain from the sky like on titan. Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jenab6
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude


Joined: Dec 25, 2005
Posts: 613
Location: Hillsboro, West Virginia

PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 3:45 pm    Post subject: Re: Titan's surface organics surpass oil reserves on Earth Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Serial_Worrier wrote:
No I am addicted to hydrocarbons and I say let's suck every last drop out of TITAN. Might as well face it, we're addicted to oil!

If you were part of a colony orbiting Titan, those hydrocarbons would probably make a dandy energy resource in combination with oxygen extracted from nearby ice. Assuming that the colony never, for reasons of other habitat limitations, exceeded 10,000 people, the Titan resource might last a billion years.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Peak Oil Discussion All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Atom News FeedRSS 1.0 News FeedRSS 2.0 News FeedRSS Forums Feed