Peak Oil News

 

  Login or Register
 
Menu
 News
 Search
 Topics
 Stories Archive
 Submit News
 Discussions
 Code of Conduct
 Forums
 Forums Search
 Last 24 Hours
 PO 24hrs
 Peak Blog
 Resources
 About Us
 Downloads
 Web Links
 PeakWiki
 PeakPortal
 Focus Search
 Peak TV
 Peak Oil Boston
 Houston Peak Oil
 Members
 Your Account
 Members List
 Ignore List
 JOIN!
 Private Messages
 
google
 
PeakSpeak
NICKNAME

Download TeamSpeak
What is PeakSpeak?
Peak Oil on IRC
 
Photo Album
Submit Photo
Peakoil.com is You!


member photos
 
Light Sweet Crude Oil
 
Member Quotes
Like the illusion of Wall Street, with its vast and powerful investment banks, now shuttered, China too is an illusion perpetuated by the Globalists that gave us the 15,000 mile Caesar salad, poisoned cat food and lead based paint on babies' pacifiers. Like the illusion that money would come from thin air to always push housing prices higher, China has spent a generation pursuing its illusion. Pursuing an unattainable dream to be like the West, while 6000 years of its carefully shepherded top soil blows into the sea.

shortonoil

Suggest Quote

 
ICM
Cisco & Net App Training
 
Peak Oil News: Forums

Peakoil.com :: View topic - Why Stone Age?
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Why Stone Age?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 8, 9, 10 ... 12, 13, 14  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Population & Carrying Capacity
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Ludi
NeoMaster
NeoMaster


Joined: Dec 27, 2004
Posts: 13191
Location: naive idiot fantasy world

PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:18 pm    Post subject: Re: Why Stone Age? Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

vtsnowedin wrote:
The first oil well was drilled by Drake in 1859. So there is no possibility of going back to any technology level prior to that date. This would include steam locomotives , steam ships


Kind of tough if you don't have much coal.
_________________
"...powerdown so soft and fluffy you'll think you're living in a pillow." - jboogy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vtsnowedin
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude


Joined: Jul 11, 2008
Posts: 633

PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:21 pm    Post subject: Re: Why Stone Age? Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

We are the Saudia Arabia of coal. we have plenty though pollution is a problem that must be dealt with.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EndOfGrowth
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Dec 04, 2006
Posts: 251
Location: End of the plateau

PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:28 pm    Post subject: Re: Why Stone Age? Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

ReverseEngineer wrote:
EndOfGrowth wrote:
Make no mistake, when global oil production begins it's steep remorseless decline, we are going back to the stone age.

http://www.energybulletin.net/node/4740


Demonstrate the nature of the mistake.

Reverse Engineer


Care to clarify?
_________________
Machines are what distinguish modern man from the savage.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
VMarcHart
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude


Joined: May 26, 2008
Posts: 1190
Location: Chicago, IL

PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:36 pm    Post subject: Re: Why Stone Age? Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Ludi wrote:
vtsnowedin wrote:
The first oil well was drilled by Drake in 1859. So there is no possibility of going back to any technology level prior to that date. This would include steam locomotives , steam ships
Kind of tough if you don't have much coal.
I think VT has a point, Ludi.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vtsnowedin
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude


Joined: Jul 11, 2008
Posts: 633

PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:54 pm    Post subject: Re: Why Stone Age? Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Cool But when I wear my hat it dosn't show!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ReverseEngineer
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Jul 16, 2008
Posts: 1741

PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 2:06 pm    Post subject: Re: Why Stone Age? Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

EndOfGrowth wrote:
ReverseEngineer wrote:
EndOfGrowth wrote:
Make no mistake, when global oil production begins it's steep remorseless decline, we are going back to the stone age.

http://www.energybulletin.net/node/4740


Demonstrate the nature of the mistake.

Reverse Engineer


Care to clarify?


In other words, specify precisely what the mistake is you are refering to that makes a decline to stone age technology an inevitable outcome of the steep and remorseless decline of oil.

Reverse Engineer
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EndOfGrowth
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Dec 04, 2006
Posts: 251
Location: End of the plateau

PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 2:33 pm    Post subject: Re: Why Stone Age? Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

ReverseEngineer wrote:
EndOfGrowth wrote:
ReverseEngineer wrote:
EndOfGrowth wrote:
Make no mistake, when global oil production begins it's steep remorseless decline, we are going back to the stone age.

http://www.energybulletin.net/node/4740


Demonstrate the nature of the mistake.

Reverse Engineer


Care to clarify?


In other words, specify precisely what the mistake is you are refering to that makes a decline to stone age technology an inevitable outcome of the steep and remorseless decline of oil.

Reverse Engineer


It's a figure of speech Smile
_________________
Machines are what distinguish modern man from the savage.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lanthanide
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Nov 24, 2007
Posts: 140
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand

PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 3:50 pm    Post subject: Re: Why Stone Age? Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

outcast wrote:
Notice how it says it is three times more abundant than silver, yet I'm not hearing anyone shouting that we will run out of silver. Anyway, here is a good post that will hopefully clear this up a bit.

I think you missed my point entirely, outcast. Common materials like iron and copper won't be a problem, precisely because we have 1) heaps of it sitting around in mostly pure form such as buildings and electrical wiring, 2) deposits of high-grade ore are still available for production even in a low energy future.

Indium, on the other hand, is very expensive to extract precisely because there aren't high-grade ore deposits of it available.

My entire point, is that in a future with less energy resources, where large-scale strip mining and processing operations aren't really feasible, indium will be rare. Much like it said in the wikipedia article that there wasn't more than about 1 gram of it isolated anywhere in the world before 1924. If anything, that single statement proves my point entirely.

Of course, society seemed to get along just fine without indium until recently, but I wasn't arguing that point, just that it would be much rarer. This in turn could have large ramifications on future technology - what happens if they discover a really fantastic solar power cell that could preserve our current way of life (more or less), but it relies on a hard-to-extract rare earth element that is not widely available?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ReverseEngineer
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Jul 16, 2008
Posts: 1741

PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 5:30 pm    Post subject: Re: Why Stone Age? Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

EndOfGrowth wrote:

It's a figure of speech Smile


AKA: A claim you suppose to be true you do not want to spend time defending in an argument with me Wink

Make a specific argument, I'll refute it. I can't do much with a Figure of Speech.

Reverse Engineer
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ludi
NeoMaster
NeoMaster


Joined: Dec 27, 2004
Posts: 13191
Location: naive idiot fantasy world

PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 5:47 pm    Post subject: Re: Why Stone Age? Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

vtsnowedin wrote:
We are the Saudia Arabia of coal. we have plenty though pollution is a problem that must be dealt with.


Plenty of coal for the next few hundred to several thousand years or so?

That's the time frame I've been talking about throughout this entire thread.

I am not talking about the near future.
_________________
"...powerdown so soft and fluffy you'll think you're living in a pillow." - jboogy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EndOfGrowth
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Dec 04, 2006
Posts: 251
Location: End of the plateau

PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 6:09 pm    Post subject: Re: Why Stone Age? Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

ReverseEngineer wrote:
EndOfGrowth wrote:





Make a specific argument



Did you not read the article?
_________________
Machines are what distinguish modern man from the savage.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
outcast
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Apr 21, 2008
Posts: 308

PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 6:19 pm    Post subject: Re: Why Stone Age? Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Quote:
Of course, society seemed to get along just fine without indium until recently, but I wasn't arguing that point, just that it would be much rarer. This in turn could have large ramifications on future technology - what happens if they discover a really fantastic solar power cell that could preserve our current way of life (more or less), but it relies on a hard-to-extract rare earth element that is not widely available?


For one thing that isn't going to happen for a while, which does give us some time to find an alternative power source for the mining machines. The processing machines can just use something like this to provide power.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
outcast
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Apr 21, 2008
Posts: 308

PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 6:53 pm    Post subject: Re: Why Stone Age? Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Quote:
Mine is just based on the assumption that iron will turn to iron oxide over a long period of time, and become prohibitively difficult to smelt back into iron. Nothing "sudden" about it.


Like I said, it depends on your prediction. For all this iron to turn to nothing because of rust it will take hundreds of years. Even so rust can be prevented.

Quote:
I find your assumption that there are of necessity replacements for every material to be flawed.


How so? The only material I can think of that doesn't have an alternative is phosphorus. But here's an example, a while ago there a lot of people thought we were suddenly going to run out of tantulum, an element used in making high quality capacitors. So, they started using niobium instead.

Quote:
I find your assumption that alternatives will be found "in time" to be flawed.


How so? We were able to find an alternative to tantalum quickly enough.

Quote:
My other assumption which may or may not be flawed is that practical information will become increasingly difficult to find, retain, and transfer between individuals and societies.


I still have to disagree, the reason why so few people have these "survival skills" (I think that is what you were alluding to) is because it isn't practical for most of us. If I lived in compton or harlem, how would wilderness survival help? Practical skills vary depending on what your situation is. Now that most of the world is literate and an increasing number of people have the internet, it becomes easier than ever to look into how to do certain things. Like your practical chemistry thread. 20 years ago it would have been impossible to so conveniently look up such information.

Quote:
But it's kind of irrelevant what our assumptions are, because our assumptions won't change reality, whatever it is or may become.


You're right in that it doesn't change the reality, but it still does matter because people base their planning on what they think they know. If someone's assumptions are wrong, then usually they will make a bad decision based on wrong assumptions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vtsnowedin
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude


Joined: Jul 11, 2008
Posts: 633

PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 7:14 pm    Post subject: Re: Why Stone Age? Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Ludi wrote:
vtsnowedin wrote:
We are the Saudia Arabia of coal. we have plenty though pollution is a problem that must be dealt with.


Plenty of coal for the next few hundred to several thousand years or so?

That's the time frame I've been talking about throughout this entire thread.

I am not talking about the near future.


We are about one hundred years ahead of the invention of the automobile and human flight. Another hundred years will take science and technology as far beyond what we can imagine today as space flight was to a citizen of 1908. We have plenty of coal for the next hundred years and six billion people looking for a better way to do things. In one hundred years global warming will have happened or not, florida will be under water , or not, the human population will have stabilized at sustainable levels , one way or the other. We are not going back to the stone age not now not five hundred years from now not ever. Change will happen and it will be traumatic at times, but there is no need to burn the books and start over and every discovery that has been made sense the inventon of writing need not be reinvented oil or no oil.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ReverseEngineer
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Jul 16, 2008
Posts: 1741

PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 7:23 pm    Post subject: Re: Why Stone Age? Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

EndOfGrowth wrote:
ReverseEngineer wrote:
EndOfGrowth wrote:





Make a specific argument



Did you not read the article?


Sure I did. All it does is mention oil based products that won't be available. BFD. In no way does it demonstrate we inevitably end up with Stone Knives and Bearskins.

Reverse Engineer
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Population & Carrying Capacity All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 8, 9, 10 ... 12, 13, 14  Next
Page 9 of 14

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Atom News FeedRSS 1.0 News FeedRSS 2.0 News FeedRSS Forums Feed