Time Machine

ReducedToZero · Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 1:46 am Post subject: Time Machine

Humans have always dreamed and idealized about the posibilities of a time machine.

I was sitting around thinking tonight: If I jumped into a time machine during Peak Oil, and fast forwarded, say, centuries, millenea, beyond, would the mistakes and themes of the 19th to 21st century repeat themselves? Would sustainability be necessity or would we eventually revert by some other means to an overshot species?

Would the Oil Era be considered the "Height" of the human race?

Clearly this question has different answers depending on the aspect of humans that is focused on:

Morality
Technology
Population

patience · Expert Joined: Jan 04, 2008 Posts: 1761

Can't change history, as far as I know, but it would be nice to get some direction now so we don't screw it all up so badly.
_________________
Local fix-it guy..

Heineken · Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:34 am Post subject: Re: Time Machine

I think the human race reached its height during the classical period, thousands of years ago.

It's been downhill ever since.
_________________
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---Me and my brother

vision-master · Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:37 am Post subject: Re: Time Machine

vtsnowedin · Intermediate Crude Joined: Jul 11, 2008 Posts: 633

I think the human races best days are ahead of it.
Unfortunatly our worst days may well lie between now and that brighter future.
I would like to think that the low point in our history was Dunkirk in WWII but with a nuclear armed Russia thrashing around Europe at the start of Peak Oil the worst maybe yet to come.

Heineken · Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:52 am Post subject: Re: Time Machine

vision-master · Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 7:15 am Post subject: Re: Time Machine

vtsnowedin · Intermediate Crude Joined: Jul 11, 2008 Posts: 633

I think that the population/energy/food problem will be solved one way or the other hopefully not by nuclear war.
Post population decline where I expect we will get down to a world population of about two billion the strain on the enviroment will be greatly reduced. No need to over fish or farm marginal soils. The portions of the earth that are no longer being exploited by four billion people will quickly heal to a stable and productive state, We may abandon arid areas like the Los Angelels basin entirely.
And I think further advances in technology will let us live quite well using only renewable solar energy with no net pollution .
So the hunting and the fishing will be better, the food will be good to eat, the air will be clean and the need for war will be gone.
Now if we can just find an easy way past that annoying population problem ??

Kingcoal · Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 7:49 am Post subject: Re: Time Machine

The "Golden Age" is always just around the corner. What stands in our way? That's the $64 question. Maybe it has something to do with human ignorance en mass. There have always been enlightened ones - true enlightened ones, not those whole think they have to turn enlightenment into a secret society. The problem has always been with the "great unwashed masses," in their hands is the fate of mankind. It's always been that way and it always will be. The rulers of this planet have always been far outnumbered and that scares them to death. Their solution has always been to scare the masses to death and thus into submission through control which begets war. It's an on going cycle and when and if it ever stops, utopia will truly blossom. The masses think they are sheep and thus think that they need a sheep herder. In that way, they debase themselves and pave a personal road to hell for themselves. The ultimate truth is that the only thing that mankind has ever needed is personal responsibility. We are absolutely free and that requires integrity, intelligence and wisdom. Unfortunately, the masses just don't ever seem to wake up to the truth. It is everyone's personal choice as to which master they serve; if any. It's always been that way and it always will be that way.
_________________
"That's the problem with mercy, kid... It just ain't professional" - Fast Eddie, The Color of Money

mos6507 · Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 8:40 am Post subject: Re: Time Machine

vision-master · Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 10:31 am Post subject: Re: Time Machine

TWilliam · Light Sweet Crude Joined: Nov 28, 2004 Posts: 1799

doodlebug2 · Tar Sands Joined: May 25, 2008 Posts: 52

I think it will be a slow , almost inperceptible decline. Ignorance of the people and not seeing the signs leads me to that conclusion. Plus, the idea that people feel that something wonderful will apprear or be invented (hydrogen et. al and oil shales etc.) that will clear up the worlds problems. It seems every year the ocean get worse and worse and nothing is every done about it.

I still do not understand how with population growing and peak oil around the bend we will feed everybody???IMO.

Opies · Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 2:38 pm Post subject: Re: Time Machine

I don't know whether it will be a peak in morality or technology, but I would definitely say this will be the peak in human population. Barring some incredible discovery, we will never have even close to 6.7 billion again

albente · Light Sweet Crude Joined: Aug 20, 2004 Posts: 1361

2012 is subject to constant misinterpretation. After Jose Arguelles brought attention to the Maya calender, lesser minds decided to interpret what they could not understand (meaning that the calender ends) as the end of the world as we know it. Doomsday in other words.

Time, as we generally define it, is a constant. What if it develops a dynamic of its own?

Per Terrence McKenna in one of his mind-excursions, a breakthough possibly could happen if a message sent from the here and now would reach the future. This, obviously is not an option at current standards. However, if the overall capacity of intelligence is boosted (with the help of our silicon friends the computers), and if a mind should 'touch the future', be it organic or artificial, a short circuit with the future, or more accurate an implosion of the static time model would occur. The dog that finally bites his own tail.

Mc Kenna visualizes a 'time' where you don't choose to live at a certain address, but rather where you pick the 'time' as an address of your choice.

However:

Time travel is not possible before such a short-circuit, meaning, if 2012 (which was determined by McKenna independently from Arguelles) should indeed be the annihilation point (of time as we define it), we will never be able to return to the time that we are in right now. So, you better savor the moment, since it will be lost forever!