Posted: Sun Feb 19, 2006 5:36 pm Post subject: Peakoil and Hydrocarbon Depletion: Back to the Basics
This thread is mainly for those just becoming aware of the issue and who are new to the site. If any of our site experts catch any numbers that are not quite right, drop me a pm so I can make corrections.
Peak oil means that no matter how much money or technology you throw at an oil well or region, you cannot increase the extraction rate of the oil reservoirs. In other words, from then on, the oil production goes into terminal decline.
The peaking of world oil discovery is not in the future, it is in the past; 1962, to be exact. And since oil production, or extraction, follows discovery, this reality will soon catch up with us. Many of the major oil producing countries have already gone into production decline. The world as a whole, may have, or soon will. We will only know for sure in hindsight. Depending on the data source, we now consume four to six barrels of oil for every one we discover.
In its monthly report for February, the IEA predicted worldwide demand for oil in 2006 would increase by 1.78 million barrels a day. Since total demand is now put at about 85.1 million barrels a day, this equates to about a 2% world oil demand growth rate in 2006. In the US, demand is seen rising by 1.7 percent. China, however, is projected to have an oil product growth rate of 5.8 % in 2006. Link
From what I have read, 60-70% of new projected growth capacity projects coming on-line will be consumed by world depletion alone. We are seeing conservative declines rate projections of 3 to 4% for the world as a whole. Some project it will be much higher.
Andrew Gould, CEO of the giant oil services firm Schlumberger, for instance, recently explained the global decline rate may be far higher than what Cheney predicted seven years ago:
An accurate average decline rate is hard to estimate, but an overall figure of 8% is not an unreasonable assumption.
An 8% yearly decline would cut global oil production by a whopping 50% in under nine years. If a 5% cut in production caused prices to triple in the 1970s, what do you think a 50% cut is going to do?
To take over for fossil fuels as their production declines, an alternative energy source would have to be cheap and abundant, and the technology to exploit it would have to be mature and capable of being distributed all over the world in what may turn out to be a rather short time. No known energy source meets these requirements. Tar sands are projected to triple to 3 mbpd in 10 years. ANWR will produce 1 mbpd if ever developed, (mostly limited by the Alaskan oil pipeline capacity of 2 mbpd, which currently runs half full with Prudhoe Bay oil.) and that would be 10 years off from the go-ahead to develop.
In a 1999 speech, while still CEO of Halliburton, Dick Cheney stated:
Quote:
By some estimates, there will be an average of two-percent annual growth in global oil demand over the years ahead, along with, conservatively, a three-percent natural decline in production from existing reserves. That means by 2010 we will need on the order of an additional 50 million barrels a day.
The math here is quite simple.
If we need a 2% growth rate of oil extraction to maintain economic growth to create jobs, service the debt, etc., and we have a 3 to 8% decline rate (even others say 13%) that equates to a 5 to 10% shortfall of oil availability (4.3 to 8.5 mbpd). Tar sands, and other unconventional oil resources or alternative fuels, cannot make up this shortfall. Increases in efficiency and conservation are short-lived measures due to population growth alone and have associated consequences in a capitalistic system: Increased efficiency usually leads to increased consumption and conservation leads to a self-induced recession as economic activity is curtailed. Each year, to continue to be effective, the standard of living would have to decline as the pie (supply) will only get smaller, not bigger.
Meanwhile, the need to service a 87 trillion dollar shortfall in existing debt and unfunded entitlements continues (US alone), along with the demand for jobs, food, clothing, and housing for the expected 3 billion newcomers projected to inhabit the planet by 2050.
From what energy source will they be sustained?
From part of your share of the pie?
No?
I thought so.
Scarcity breeds poverty and poverty breeds conflict.
Geopolitics comes mightily into play.
As Paul Harvey is famous for saying, “stand by for news!” _________________ A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
Live in Arizona? Check out: http://sustainablearizona.org and read my blog.
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 5:23 pm Post subject: Re: Peakoil and Hydrocarbon Depletion: Back to the Basics
Thanks Monte. I think such a thread is a good idea and a welcome relief from food scarcity, diseases, and environmental threads.
My view on this:
In the past years we have seen the UK, Norway and Mexico reach their peak, and in all probability China has done so last year. This means that at this the moment an estimated 40% of the world's oil production comes from countries which are in decline; which cannot and will not increase their production, ever.
To understand the ramifications of that you can make the following calculations. Let's assume that the percentage stays at 40% for a while. The average decrease in production for the countries in decline is around 2-3% a year.
- In order to keep our oil production at the same level, the countries which are not yet in decline must expand their capacity by a similar percentage (2-3%) on average.
- In order to increase the world production by 1 percent these countries must expand their production by 4-5% a year, on average.
- In order to increase the world production by 2 percent these countries must expand their production by 6-7%, on average.
You don't have to be an oil expert, economist, or a mathematician to understand that these statistics are not very favorable.
And they certainly don't point to a conclusion that we don't have to worry about oil for the next 20 years.
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 11:00 am Post subject: Re: Peakoil and Hydrocarbon Depletion: Back to the Basics
Something that bugs me is people keep dragging other things into the whole scenario. Aliens, illuminati, second coming of christ, whatever..
Just oil depletion alone will kick us in the ass, no need to invent other bs to add to the panic. Certainly no bs that's wild speculation or blind faith based. _________________
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 2:23 pm Post subject: Re: Peakoil and Hydrocarbon Depletion: Back to the Basics
Monte is correct, and has einformed us and opened our eyes to peak oil, and it has been very informative, and factual, with lots of proof, about the whole scenario, and I know he understands better than most what is going to happen after the peak. I take his hints sincerely, he takes many things into the equation. The whole thing depends on human reaction to having your money, life, wealth and power diminish.
Of course, what is not so obvious is how humanity will respond to peak oil. Look at history, the response is always conquest. and they gave it all they could, until they could fight no more, today that represents 84,000 megatons. Each one punches a hole in the ozone layer for 6 months about 100 miles in diameter.
This scenario of a winnable world war is no longer possible between the four largest powers in the world, They swill never be conquered or they will never loose a war again.
We entered this new age right after WWII, this has changed everything.The three biggest powers will never take loss of oil or oilfields while they can help it.
The big bear already has threatened W not to get involved in IRAN and we still have oil.
Yes, peak oil would do us in, but it is virtual certainty we will never see a collapse from peak oil, the collapse will probably come quite a few years before real oil deficits ever hit.
Different classes of people behave differently. Downsizing means VOLUNTARILY cutting wealth, for the benefit of the whole? In which decade has this ever happened?
But unfortunately, this lack of co-operation by people themselves kind of puts a crimp in prolonging ourcondition. Basically, people will never tolerate any kind of downsizing at all, it should always come from the other guy and they are usually too happpy to give them theirs.
For example, will you cut your oil use in half and sell your house to move closer to the city so that hate chanting middle easterners screaming for satan's destruction while burning amrikan flags can have some oil to drive their cars? We are all a global community remember? Yah.
I think pigs will fly before then.
Human nature is key to what is about to happen. Most will not be ready because they have been told basically human nature is "good" inside, because that is what they want to believe. We will soon see if this is a right assessment of human nature, because the whole world is about to be put to a rude test.
If you are new on the web site, you should stick to the Oil issue, these other things are out of our control. Don't get upset when you figure out that our society cannot continue like it is and that there are no other real alternatives at this time,. Calculate things our, and rechack them, use a calculator.
Understand British Thermal Units, the measurement of heat, and get a general idea of what it means and how it compares to a gallon of gasoline or diesel. Most people do not know what a "quadrillion Btus" means; indeed most engineers and scientists don't know either.
There is also a lack of understanding about the amount of waste generated in america and how much power we use. "How big is a billion tons? Will it fit in my refrigerator?" And what millions of barrels and billions of Barrels really mean.
This site should open your eyes to a lot of things, enjoy it, but go slow. What you are about to find out will definitely change your outlook on life.
We should hope for the best and plan for the worst.
Now to try and ward off the doomer scenario, just browse this site (I don't own it or know who owns it, it is just a good site.
(http://www.thebulletin.org/article.php?art_ofn=nd99norris_024)
I won't make a click to it you can cut and paste, it is only for the die hards in here.
and if you still don't believe it here is a song:
Baby can’t you see
It’s a real dream world
Dream world
You’ve been living in a dream world
Trust me
You just can’t escape from reality
Greed meets reality
Doesn’t mean we’re in a dream world
Here I am, there you are, we gotta make it together
And we’ve made, it so far, so it can only get better
or worse.
Posted: Mon Apr 03, 2006 10:00 pm Post subject: Re: Peakoil and Hydrocarbon Depletion: Back to the Basics
smiley wrote:
In the past years we have seen the UK, Norway and Mexico reach their peak, and in all probability China has done so last year. This means that at this the moment an estimated 40% of the world's oil production comes from countries which are in decline; which cannot and will not increase their production, ever.
Kuwait's main field is also peaked. Indonesia is no longer an oil exporter and is considering leaving OPEC. Australia I belive has also peaked.
Does anyone know of any others?
I've heard that the Iraq war is damaging the fields possibly limiting the total amount of oil able to be extracted. Could something similar be happening to Nigerian fields?
Saudis are also under a lot of pressure to maintain and increase there production, possibly damaging their fields in the process. _________________ "Once the game is over, the king and the pawn go back in the same box."
-Italian Proverb
Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 1:34 pm Post subject: Peak oil is infrastructure constraints.
Peak oil is infrastructure constraints.
The initial period of exponential growth in a field or region is "about" discovering the limits of the field or region's easy oil. The point when P/Q over P begins to linearize is that moment when regional exploration, development, and new production become noticebly more difficult and expensive but developed production remains at a constant (relative to the life of the field). At that point capital is used for maintenance of existing fields in the region, rather than investment into new production.
The final period of exponential decline begins when the developed-field production mimic the same increase in costs that was seen in new field development at the beginning. At that point captital goes into new fields, investment goes into aquisition, and maintenance of existing fields and facilities declines.
The Hubbert drama is geological but is played out on a human stage with oil field props and human desires. On the upslope greed and ambition are rewarded with increasing volume and income. On the downslop geologic resistance creates depression and restraint. _________________ ree rah rip ram. sunofabitch godamn. hidey didey christ almighty. rah rah crap
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 9:20 pm Post subject: Re: Peakoil and Hydrocarbon Depletion: Back to the Basics
As I sit and watch people focusing on tangents, they should be called back to reality by statements such as these:
"Ask anyone who remembers the 1980 crisis…. In 1980 it was a problem in distribution; the oil was there, but it wasn’t getting to the corner gas station. In 2008, the oil won’t be there. The psychological realization that the change is permanent may be as devastating as the shortage itself."
Kenneth S. Deffeyes
Fear and greed drives the market.
Very basic to having a grasp of hydrocarbon depletion. All the alternatives in the world won't matter much in the mad dash for the economics exit door.
If there is no prospect for a long-term assured return, there will be no capital available for anything. _________________ A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
Live in Arizona? Check out: http://sustainablearizona.org and read my blog.
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 4:38 am Post subject: Re: Peakoil and Hydrocarbon Depletion: Back to the Basics
If there is no prospect for a long-term assured return, there will be no capital available for anything.
This is one the most important points to understand, i don't think it can be raised too many times.
I recently tried pointing it out to a (good) businessman, thinking I was speaking his language, but he just wouldn't accept it.
I did spark an interest in the issues in him though, so maybe he'll realize eventually. _________________ "One minute I held the key, next the walls were closed on me, and I discovered that my castle stands upon pillars of salt and pillars of sand."
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 6:19 pm Post subject: Re: Peakoil and Hydrocarbon Depletion: Back to the Basics
Hi Monte et Al,
One question - you refer to that well know Peak Discoveries diagram. Could you provide me with a non-po-related site with these discovery data. I need it for a talk where it will be strategically unwise to mention PO, it should be a mainstream source
Thanks in advance. _________________ There is no knowledge that is not power.
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 6:36 pm Post subject: Re: Peakoil and Hydrocarbon Depletion: Back to the Basics
sch_peakoiler wrote:
Hi Monte et Al,
One question - you refer to that well know Peak Discoveries diagram. Could you provide me with a non-po-related site with these discovery data. I need it for a talk where it will be strategically unwise to mention PO, it should be a mainstream source
Thanks in advance.
You want a graph? Or data?
EIA will have the data. I have several graphs that show production/ discovery/ demand that don't mention peakoil. _________________ A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
Live in Arizona? Check out: http://sustainablearizona.org and read my blog.
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:34 am Post subject: Re: Peakoil and Hydrocarbon Depletion: Back to the Basics
MonteQuest wrote:
sch_peakoiler wrote:
Hi Monte et Al,
One question - you refer to that well know Peak Discoveries diagram. Could you provide me with a non-po-related site with these discovery data. I need it for a talk where it will be strategically unwise to mention PO, it should be a mainstream source
Thanks in advance.
You want a graph? Or data?
EIA will have the data. I have several graphs that show production/ discovery/ demand that don't mention peakoil.
The best would be a graph which resides on a credible website, so that there is no room for questions on that part.
Thanks again! _________________ There is no knowledge that is not power.
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 9:17 pm Post subject: Re: Peakoil and Hydrocarbon Depletion: Back to the Basics
Bump up for the newbies. _________________ A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
Live in Arizona? Check out: http://sustainablearizona.org and read my blog.
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 8:50 am Post subject: Re: Peakoil and Hydrocarbon Depletion: Back to the Basics
My 2 pence
Formatting should be corrected so people dont have to scroll left to right. Not everyone is chugging away at 1600x1200 on a big monitor! _________________ "Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."
Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum