Peak Oil News

 

  Login or Register
 
Menu
 News
 Search
 Topics
 Stories Archive
 Submit News
 Discussions
 Code of Conduct
 Forums
 Forums Search
 Last 24 Hours
 PO 24hrs
 Peak Blog
 Resources
 About Us
 Downloads
 Web Links
 PeakWiki
 PeakPortal
 Focus Search
 Peak TV
 Peak Oil Boston
 Houston Peak Oil
 Members
 Your Account
 Members List
 Ignore List
 JOIN!
 Private Messages
 
google
 
PeakSpeak
NICKNAME

Download TeamSpeak
What is PeakSpeak?
Peak Oil on IRC
 
Photo Album
Submit Photo
Peakoil.com is You!


member photos
 
Light Sweet Crude Oil
 
Member Quotes
I will believe the Saudis don't see any upcoming problems with Ghawar when they cancel one of their projects due to low oil prices. If they continue to be full steam ahead with increasing their capacity then I think they are aware that Ghawar may not be as robust in 5 years time as they would like us to believe.

nero

Suggest Quote

 
ICM
Cisco & Net App Training
 
Peak Oil News: Forums

Peakoil.com :: View topic - Founder of the Weather Channel On Global Warming And Gas
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Founder of the Weather Channel On Global Warming And Gas

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Environment
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
BlinkBlink
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Dec 27, 2005
Posts: 120
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 11:29 pm    Post subject: Re: Founder of the Weather Channel On Global Warming And Gas Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

I keep seeing this cooling for 10 straight years figure. I'd like to know where they get it from.


_________________
"I've seen the future, brother, it is murder."

Leonard Cohen

http://theblokeyshed.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Cashmere
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Mar 27, 2008
Posts: 1971

PostPosted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 11:32 pm    Post subject: Re: Founder of the Weather Channel On Global Warming And Gas Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Everybody plays with the numbers.

Your own graph shows a high point and then 7/8 years lower than the high point in the last 9.

Trend is up.

Question really is, how much are we pushing it up?
_________________
Massive Human Dieoff must occur as a result of Peak Oil. Many more than half will die. It will occur everywhere, including where you live. If you fail to recognize this, then your odds of living move toward the "going to die" group.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cashmere
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Mar 27, 2008
Posts: 1971

PostPosted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 11:44 pm    Post subject: Re: Founder of the Weather Channel On Global Warming And Gas Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Here's another graph . . .
Temp Graph

From that graph there is no doubt that the 6 year trend is cooling and that the temp has been dropping from a high in 1997.

That doesn't disprove man made global warming, of course, but it does tend to make the pro argument less likely.

EDIT
And we're only up about 0.6 degrees in 140 years of industrial civ?


lAnyway, we're already discussed this.

PO makes GW a moot point.

Like arguing whether the ship is sinking or not sinking because of leaky bilge glue while a category 6 hurricane forms right off the bow.
_________________
Massive Human Dieoff must occur as a result of Peak Oil. Many more than half will die. It will occur everywhere, including where you live. If you fail to recognize this, then your odds of living move toward the "going to die" group.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lore
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Aug 26, 2005
Posts: 1008
Location: "Mad as Hell !"

PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 4:50 am    Post subject: Re: Founder of the Weather Channel On Global Warming And Gas Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Cashmere wrote:

PO makes GW a moot point.

Like arguing whether the ship is sinking or not sinking because of leaky bilge glue while a category 6 hurricane forms right off the bow.


This is yet another myth.
_________________
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Zardoz
Expert
Expert


Joined: Dec 02, 2005
Posts: 6660
Location: Oil-addicted Southern Californucopia

PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 1:44 pm    Post subject: Re: Founder of the Weather Channel On Global Warming And Gas Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

So many new and recycled trolls lately.

Five-dollar-a-gallon gasoline in the U.S. is bringing them out of the woodwork.
_________________
"Thank you for attending the oil age. We're going to scrape what we can out of these tar pits in Alberta and then shut down the machines and turn out the lights. Goodnight." - seldom_seen
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cashmere
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Mar 27, 2008
Posts: 1971

PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 7:21 am    Post subject: Re: Founder of the Weather Channel On Global Warming And Gas Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Lore wrote:
Cashmere wrote:

PO makes GW a moot point.

Like arguing whether the ship is sinking or not sinking because of leaky bilge glue while a category 6 hurricane forms right off the bow.


This is yet another myth.


Tell me that in 10 years Lore. It's easy for you to dismiss it today, when you can still drive your Toyota Pious to Starbucks for a 4 dollar latte.

In 10 years, when vandals kick in your door and rape your dog, you come and tell me then how pressing GW is.

In 10 years, GW is a dead issue, because the world is going to be in such a panic about oil depletion nobody is going to have enough wealth and spare time to focus on something as uncurrent as GW.

It's like asking the man having a heart attack to start a twice a day flossing regimen.
_________________
Massive Human Dieoff must occur as a result of Peak Oil. Many more than half will die. It will occur everywhere, including where you live. If you fail to recognize this, then your odds of living move toward the "going to die" group.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheDude
Expert
Expert


Joined: Apr 06, 2006
Posts: 3613
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia

PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 8:38 am    Post subject: Re: Founder of the Weather Channel On Global Warming And Gas Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Zardoz wrote:
So many new and recycled trolls lately.


My money's on [url= site:www.peakoil.com oilismastery]the former.[/url]

Open the Future: Peak Oil vs. Global Warming

Global warming exaggerated, insufficient oil , natural gas and coal, by Kjell Aleklett.
_________________
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
The Dude Is Not In: Leave A Message After The Beep.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lore
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Aug 26, 2005
Posts: 1008
Location: "Mad as Hell !"

PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 8:47 pm    Post subject: Re: Founder of the Weather Channel On Global Warming And Gas Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Cashmere wrote:
Tell me that in 10 years Lore. It's easy for you to dismiss it today, when you can still drive your Toyota Pious to Starbucks for a 4 dollar latte.

In 10 years, when vandals kick in your door and rape your dog, you come and tell me then how pressing GW is.

In 10 years, GW is a dead issue, because the world is going to be in such a panic about oil depletion nobody is going to have enough wealth and spare time to focus on something as uncurrent as GW.

It's like asking the man having a heart attack to start a twice a day flossing regimen.


Your nostrams about humanities dismissal of climate change shows your lack of depth in understanding the issues surrounding it.

While PO is a clear and present threat, its development does not stop climate change. We have already exceeded dangerous levels of CO2 emissions which are even now affecting rapid climate change. Peak Oil will only exacerbate the speed at which it will take place as humans haphazardly rush to fill the gap of fossile fuel depleation with other more dangerous emitters of CO2. You only have to listen to the current media wags and their mantra of drill.... drill... drill... to see this. Anything to maintain the status quo.

When major global crop failures occur and the world goes hungry it won't be just because there was a lack of fuel to plant, cultivate, and harvest them.

Further more, every human being that is, or will be born on an already overcrowded planet becomes a little carbon generator and not just through the use of liquid fuels.

Both PO and GW are two sides of the same coin as Aaron once put it.

Oh... and I don't own a dog.
_________________
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
VMarcHart
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude


Joined: May 26, 2008
Posts: 1140
Location: Chicago, IL

PostPosted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 1:34 pm    Post subject: Re: Founder of the Weather Channel On Global Warming And Gas Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Cashmere wrote:
PO makes GW a moot point.
I read the postings. Interesting debate. I guess PO is the best thing that happened to GW in a long time.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GregWatson
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Jun 07, 2008
Posts: 132

PostPosted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 12:12 am    Post subject: Re: Founder of the Weather Channel On Global Warming And Gas Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Cashmere wrote:
Here's another graph . . .
Temp Graph

And the unreferenced data points in that graph came from where? I suggest the last set of data points has been altered to show a decline based on the real data below.

Here is the unaltered data with references:
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/img/climate/research/2007/ann/global-jan-dec-error-bar-pg.gif
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/Fig.A2.lrg.gif

Then there is this which shows the Northern Hemisphere is experiencing higher heating that the tropics and the Southern Hemisphere:

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/Fig.B.lrg.gif

Wonder why? I'm sure it has nothing to do with the fact that the countries in the Northern Hemisphere emit much more CO2e than the tropics or the Southern Hemisphere?

Greg
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GregWatson
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Jun 07, 2008
Posts: 132

PostPosted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 12:21 pm    Post subject: Re: Founder of the Weather Channel On Global Warming And Gas Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Cashmere wrote:
Here's another graph . . .
Temp Graph
From that graph there is no doubt that the 6 year trend is cooling and that the temp has been dropping from a high in 1997.


Sorry mate but the last 6 year of data points on your graph are false data. Look at the data point diameters and the line widths. They are so clearly different from the rest of the graph and have been added / modified with something like Photoshop. This is false and deliberately misleading data.

So come clean Cashmere or who so ever you are, where did you get this altered, false and intentionally misleading temperature data? Was it you who deliberately altered the data to mislead gullibilies that there is a cooling event occurring when in actuality this is not so?

Greg
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wxman
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Aug 23, 2005
Posts: 177

PostPosted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 3:03 pm    Post subject: Re: Founder of the Weather Channel On Global Warming And Gas Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

There are two main groups that put together surface measurements, NASA GISS (USA) and the Hadley Center (UK). (NOAA's NCDC also does global temps, but nobody really uses those.)

NOAA has also sent up a series of satellites with Microwave Sounding Units on them, and those are analyzed for climatic purposes by the University of Alabama-Huntsville and a private company, RSS.

The original poster used NASA GISS data, which is the only one of the four to have 2005 as the warmest year. The others all have the tremendous El Nino year of 1998 as the warmest.

So, what the "skeptics" have done is decided that since '98 is the warmest, that means that we have been "cooling" for 10 years. Of course, that is a load of crap, since you don't start trend analysis on an outlier. Fact is, the the moving average has plateaued a little mid-decade here as it has done many times in the past. Anthropogenic factors did not eliminate natural variability.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lore
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Aug 26, 2005
Posts: 1008
Location: "Mad as Hell !"

PostPosted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 5:43 pm    Post subject: Re: Founder of the Weather Channel On Global Warming And Gas Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Exactly, so next year the previous 10 - year average will look rather different. I guess the deniers will have to extend their sampling range.
_________________
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
coyote
News Editor
News Editor


Joined: Oct 23, 2005
Posts: 1835
Location: East of Eden

PostPosted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 6:36 pm    Post subject: Re: Founder of the Weather Channel On Global Warming And Gas Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Cashmere wrote:
In 10 years, GW is a dead issue, because the world is going to be in such a panic about oil depletion nobody is going to have enough wealth and spare time to focus on something as uncurrent as GW.

Depends on how much coal gets burned to make up for oil and natural gas depletion; how many of our remaining forests are destroyed for biofuel and, well, just fuel; the pace of the ocean carbon cycle; and above all how much of an effect the reversal of global dimming, brought on by peak oil, will have. Depending on how bad it is, people in 10 years might care very much about global heating, whether they have the wealth to do anything about it or not.

At this point, it's impossible to know whether peak oil will have the fortunate side effect of easing off the accelerator of global heating or not. There is an awful lot of momentum built into the CO2 trajectory, decades worth. And because of global dimming and fuel substitution, peak oil may just have an exacerbating effect on heating in the short term. It will ride right on the knife's edge, and we will have to wait years or even decades to find out whether we can breathe a sigh of relief - or if peak oil will be just the beginning of our woes. Here's hoping for the former.
_________________
"If a path to the better there be, it begins with a full look at the worst." — Thomas Hardy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Environment All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Atom News FeedRSS 1.0 News FeedRSS 2.0 News FeedRSS Forums Feed