Peak Oil News

 

  Login or Register
 
Menu
 News
 Search
 Topics
 Stories Archive
 Submit News
 Discussions
 Code of Conduct
 Forums
 Forums Search
 Last 24 Hours
 PO 24hrs
 Peak Blog
 Resources
 About Us
 Downloads
 Web Links
 PeakWiki
 PeakPortal
 Focus Search
 Peak TV
 Peak Oil Boston
 Houston Peak Oil
 Members
 Your Account
 Members List
 Ignore List
 JOIN!
 Private Messages
 
google
 
PeakSpeak
NICKNAME

Download TeamSpeak
What is PeakSpeak?
Peak Oil on IRC
 
Photo Album
Submit Photo
Peakoil.com is You!


member photos
 
Light Sweet Crude Oil
 
Member Quotes
I will believe the Saudis don't see any upcoming problems with Ghawar when they cancel one of their projects due to low oil prices. If they continue to be full steam ahead with increasing their capacity then I think they are aware that Ghawar may not be as robust in 5 years time as they would like us to believe.

nero

Suggest Quote

 
ICM
Cisco & Net App Training
 
Peak Oil News: Forums

Peakoil.com :: View topic - Rice: US still puts conditions on talks with Iran (ARgh)
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Rice: US still puts conditions on talks with Iran (ARgh)

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Current Events
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
simontay78
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: May 01, 2006
Posts: 189
Location: SG

PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 2:08 pm    Post subject: Rice: US still puts conditions on talks with Iran (ARgh) Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Quote:

Rice: US still puts conditions on talks with Iran

WASHINGTON - Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Friday that the United States still has conditions for negotiating with Iran even though the Bush administration is sending a senior diplomat to weekend talks with an Iranian nuclear envoy.

She said the shift in policy is a signal the administration is serious about diplomacy, but does not mean Washington is ready for open-ended discussions with Iran. Such talks can only occur after Tehran halts activities that could lead to development of atomic weapons.

Rice spoke a day before the State Department's third-ranking diplomat, William Burns, is to attend a meeting in Switzerland with Iran's chief nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili. The US previously has shunned such gatherings, demanding that Iran first suspend its enrichment and reprocessing of uranium.

"It should be very clear to everyone that the United States has a condition for the beginning of negotiations with Iran, and that condition remains the verifiable suspension of Iran's enrichment and reprocessing activities," she told reporters at the State Department. "That remains the U.S. position and it will continue to be the U.S. position."


Link

The move initially is to trick Iran to believe that America had finally gave in and send Burns to negotiate DIRECTLY with Iran's envoy but in reality Burn's role is just only to listen and not to talk to Iran directly until Iran satisfy the "condition" of halting the nuclear enrichment.

This means it's back to square ONE...Iran had previously rejected multiple times to halt their enrichment and suffered multiple sanctions from the six world power and had mentioned that they will no longer accept such condescending talks with the "precondition" before negotiation.

The end result of this publicity stunt is that the world including Iran are tricked into a "positive outlook" into today's meeting at Geneva including Turkey Prime Minister and hope for a "wonderful" out come...

If today's meeting end up with another sanction (which will be the most severe one...may include blocking or inspecting all oil exports/imports from Iran) that might represent a "declaration" of war as Iran will face maximum destruction in their oil based economy.

Any military movement from Iran (few army trucks with ICBM move one inch on satellite photo) may give USA a chance to "beat the war drum" and allow Israel to a immediate "preemptive" strike on Iran....

All these are just my personal prediction hence may not happen and I do wish that in reality that a more positive outcome can happen but from the angle that I am looking at...the possibility may be slim. Shocked
_________________
Simon Tay
http://sgenergycrisis.blogspot.com
http://sgcomplain.blogspot.com
http://simontay.blogspot.com

http://sgenergycrisis.blogspot.com/2008/06/free-live-crude-oil-prices-nymex.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
WyoDutch
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: May 24, 2008
Posts: 126
Location: Park County, Wyoming

PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 4:26 pm    Post subject: Re: Rice: US still puts conditions on talks with Iran (ARgh) Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

John Quincy Adams wisely observed that....America goes not abroad, in search of monsters to destroy. She is the well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all. She is the champion and vindicator only of her own. She will commend the general cause by the countenance of her voice, and the benignant sympathy of her example. She well knows that by once enlisting under other banners than her own, were they even the banners of foreign independence, she would involve herself beyond the power of extrication, in all the wars of interest and intrigue, of individual avarice, envy, and ambition, which assume the colors and usurp the standard of freedom.

Obviously, Mr. Adams lived in an era before America's foreign policy was crafted in Tel Aviv and delivered by AIPAC.

Lest we forget.... Here's a photographic memory of the USS Liberty after our stalwart ally, Israel... Attacked our naval vessel without warning or provocation.

_________________
Be yourself... Everyone else is already taken.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert


Joined: Apr 09, 2007
Posts: 6270
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 4:37 pm    Post subject: Re: Rice: US still puts conditions on talks with Iran (ARgh) Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Don't worry.

Just six more months to go until Sen. Obama is president. He's already promised to negotiate with Ahmadinejad without any preconditions. Cool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SILENTTODD
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude


Joined: May 06, 2006
Posts: 873
Location: Tustin, CA

PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:27 pm    Post subject: Re: Rice: US still puts conditions on talks with Iran (ARgh) Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Plantagenet wrote:
Don't worry.

Just six more months to go until Sen. Obama is president. He's already promised to negotiate with Ahmadinejad without any preconditions. Cool


Hmmm...................................

At least Iran has never attacked an American Naval Vessel with the intent of murdering all on board.

Don't know anything about this Plantagenet? Read up from American eyewitnesses:

U.S.S. LIBERTY
_________________
Skeptical scrutiny in both Science and Religion is the means by which deep thoughts are winnowed from deep nonsense-Carl Sagan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Current Events All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Atom News FeedRSS 1.0 News FeedRSS 2.0 News FeedRSS Forums Feed