Peak Oil News

 

  Login or Register
 
Menu
 News
 Search
 Topics
 Stories Archive
 Submit News
 Discussions
 Code of Conduct
 Forums
 Forums Search
 Last 24 Hours
 PO 24hrs
 Peak Blog
 Resources
 About Us
 Downloads
 Web Links
 PeakWiki
 PeakPortal
 Focus Search
 Peak TV
 Peak Oil Boston
 Houston Peak Oil
 Members
 Your Account
 Members List
 Ignore List
 JOIN!
 Private Messages
 
google
 
PeakSpeak
NICKNAME

Download TeamSpeak
What is PeakSpeak?
Peak Oil on IRC
 
Photo Album
Submit Photo
Peakoil.com is You!


member photos
 
Light Sweet Crude Oil
 
Member Quotes
I will believe the Saudis don't see any upcoming problems with Ghawar when they cancel one of their projects due to low oil prices. If they continue to be full steam ahead with increasing their capacity then I think they are aware that Ghawar may not be as robust in 5 years time as they would like us to believe.

nero

Suggest Quote

 
ICM
Cisco & Net App Training
 
Peak Oil News: Forums

Peakoil.com :: View topic - analist logic
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

analist logic

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Economics & Finance
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Enquest
Tar Sands
Tar Sands


Joined: Mar 29, 2005
Posts: 49

PostPosted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 3:40 am    Post subject: analist logic Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Most story's about analists I read say that the high price is not due oil peak or shortage. But rather because there isn't enough rifining capacity. The total oil market invested to little in the oil market and refining.

Could somebody debunk this or are they right. In other words they will build new refining installations and price will come down?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RonMN
Fission
Fission


Joined: Mar 18, 2005
Posts: 2690
Location: Minnesota

PostPosted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 5:40 am    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

We set up most of our refineries to refine "light sweet" crude...and that type of oil has definately peaked.

Then we haven't built a new refinery in the last 30 years...now we need refineries that will refine the heavy sour crude.

But heavy sour is harder to pump (more costly) and harder to refine (more costly) so i don't think the price will be comming down...it'll be more to cusion the blow (or keep us running a while longer).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Doly
Expert
Expert


Joined: Dec 03, 2004
Posts: 4040

PostPosted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 5:44 am    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

I must confess I never quite understood this argument. Lack of refining explains why gas prices go up, but why should that make oil go up as well?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
mgibbons19
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Aug 20, 2004
Posts: 1089

PostPosted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 5:59 am    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Well, it shouldn't. Crue is 'upstream' from refining so it shuldn't.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SpasticDancer
Coal
Coal


Joined: Jan 20, 2005
Posts: 18
Location: OR, USA

PostPosted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 12:14 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Doly wrote:
I must confess I never quite understood this argument. Lack of refining explains why gas prices go up, but why should that make oil go up as well?

The proportions of crude oil being supplied is slowly shifting toward more heavy oil and less light. Thus if demand for oil remains constant (and remember that it's pretty much only refinerys thad demand crude oil (as far as I know), most everyone else wants refined oil products) then the price for light crude will increase and the price for heavy will decrease.

i.e. Lack of refinerys that can process heavy crude causes an increase in the price of light crude.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vegasmade
Tar Sands
Tar Sands


Joined: May 01, 2005
Posts: 85

PostPosted: Sun May 01, 2005 7:49 am    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

oil, both heavy and light, is being pumped at 98% capacity if i'm not mistaken. tankers aren't waiting for refinery space to offload, the refineries are waiting for oil to show up. it's trouble at both ends. more refineries can't work any faster than the crude shows up, so they haven't been built. furthermore, new tankers aren't being built to replace old ones because there isn't more crude to be transported. damned if you do and damned 'cause you don't. the capitalist business model can be sumed up in a word-profit. Spending money on refining capacity cuts profits. Shipping capacity increases, cuts profits.
Exploration is the best indicator. Oil companies now spend more to find new sources, and are finding less. For them spending money now, anywhere else is silly. If there isn't more to find, there isn't more to refine/ship. In fact, they benefit from not spending the money on refining/shipping. The price at the pump guarantees profit for them, and if it costs more to get out of the ground, my wallet feels it. They can't recoup infastructure at the pump. It's considered the price to play.
Ultimately, consumer demand is irrelevent. They know there's only so much they can pump/ship/refine, and they aren't finding more to pump. That makes the other two break even.
All the money is at the pumping of the crude. No more crude, no more money. Even induvidual gas stations don't make money from gas. The infastructure is corporate owned and the individual gas stations only see about $0.01 per gallon. Yes, that's one penny per gallon.
Have you ever noticed new pumps being installed at your usual fill up spot. That didn't raise your gas price. The company providing the gas eats the cost. Actually you've been paying for their new equipment the whole time. It's figured into the profit ratio on day one.
It's surprising that a lack of new refining capacity hasn't worried anyone before now. Any business that doesn't expand infastructure isn't planning to grow. Sure demand can grow, but like i said, that end is irrelevent. They know we'll pump every gallon provided, which ensures profit. They've intentionally not stayed ahead of demand, and now they're just breaking even. Demand does not produce supply, it only limits consumption. We can't collectively will more crude oil into a position below the pumps, so money spent at the other two points is wasted. They know, have known it, and just haven't told us.
_________________
remember-we don't inherit the earth from our parents, we lease it from our children
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cube
Fusion
Fusion


Joined: Mar 12, 2005
Posts: 3776

PostPosted: Mon May 02, 2005 12:04 am    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

vegasmade wrote:
....
It's surprising that a lack of new refining capacity hasn't worried anyone before now. Any business that doesn't expand infastructure isn't planning to grow.....
I find that quite interesting. Just about every business I can think of always likes to preach about how much bigger they're going to get whether it's a donut franchise or a company ready to go bust. Remember near the end of the dot com years? The CEO's of those companies were painting a picture of a brighter future all the way up until it was time to turn off the lights in the office building.

Getting back to oil.....hmm now isn't this interesting? So far the loudest preachers of a "bigger and brighter future" is coming from OPEC countries (SA comes to mind). Lets all cross our fingers and hope these guys have more honesty then those dot-com CEO's of yesterday. Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MarkL
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: Sep 13, 2004
Posts: 281
Location: US

PostPosted: Mon May 02, 2005 10:46 am    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

..

Last edited by MarkL on Sat Aug 25, 2007 11:44 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vegasmade
Tar Sands
Tar Sands


Joined: May 01, 2005
Posts: 85

PostPosted: Mon May 02, 2005 7:04 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

vegasmade wrote:

Exploration is the best indicator. Oil companies now spend more to find new sources, and are finding less.

I'm now hearing that exploration expenditures are down in the last few years. Yes, that means less money is being spent to find oil. Probably because it's not to be found. The globe has been searched, and short of the ice caps melting, new crude won't be found.
Money is being spent, but on the old wells. Sounds like they're now trying to wring every last drop out of what has been found. If that's not a sign of peak, I don't know what is.
With the industry diverting from exploration to increased capacity, we can now safely worry.
_________________
remember-we don't inherit the earth from our parents, we lease it from our children
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Economics & Finance All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Atom News FeedRSS 1.0 News FeedRSS 2.0 News FeedRSS Forums Feed