Peak Oil News

 

  Login or Register
 
Menu
 News
 Search
 Topics
 Stories Archive
 Submit News
 Discussions
 Code of Conduct
 Forums
 Forums Search
 Last 24 Hours
 PO 24hrs
 Peak Blog
 Resources
 About Us
 Downloads
 Web Links
 PeakWiki
 PeakPortal
 Focus Search
 Peak TV
 Peak Oil Boston
 Houston Peak Oil
 Members
 Your Account
 Members List
 Ignore List
 JOIN!
 Private Messages
 
google
 
PeakSpeak
NICKNAME

Download TeamSpeak
What is PeakSpeak?
Peak Oil on IRC
 
Photo Album
Submit Photo
Peakoil.com is You!


member photos
 
Light Sweet Crude Oil
 
Member Quotes
I will believe the Saudis don't see any upcoming problems with Ghawar when they cancel one of their projects due to low oil prices. If they continue to be full steam ahead with increasing their capacity then I think they are aware that Ghawar may not be as robust in 5 years time as they would like us to believe.

nero

Suggest Quote

 
ICM
Cisco & Net App Training
 
Peak Oil News: Forums

Peakoil.com :: View topic - PO may lead to false victory for emission reductions
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

PO may lead to false victory for emission reductions

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Peak Oil Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Repent
Tar Sands
Tar Sands


Joined: Aug 20, 2004
Posts: 97
Location: Winnipeg, Canada

PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2005 2:45 am    Post subject: PO may lead to false victory for emission reductions Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

As oil peaks and then starts down the path to irrevocable decline, world carbon emissions may drop off somewhat as there is less oil being burned.

We should guard ourselves- This drop off in carbon emissions will likely be viewed by politicians, greens and others as countries having success in meeting their emission reduction targets- but this is not the case. In fact this will likely only be a temporary drop till people start to switch to oil alternatives like coal or even wood- which have higher carbon contents.

Can you imagine the impact of a winter heating oil shortage in the American mid-west and north-east at the height of winter? Imagine the majority of people in this region deal with this by switching to burning wood in their fireplaces. The pollution effects of 80 million people suddenly throwing another log on the fire would be immediate and catastrophic.

A short term dip in world carbon emissions should instead be seen as the smoking gun- that the world has indeed surpassed peak oil!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pablo2079
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Jun 08, 2005
Posts: 329
Location: Cascadia

PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2005 2:57 am    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Actually, the decrease in oil will most likely be met with an increase in the use of coal. If this comes to pass, the emissions will actually go up tremendously.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Repent
Tar Sands
Tar Sands


Joined: Aug 20, 2004
Posts: 97
Location: Winnipeg, Canada

PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2005 3:01 am    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Either way- A short drop off of carbon emissions met with sudden dramatically higher emissions or in possible as you have suggested a huge and immediate jump in carbon emissions.

Either- would be the smoking gun to say peak oil has been surpassed. I would bet on the former senario first.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MD
Community Manager


Joined: May 02, 2005
Posts: 3524
Location: Oh really?

PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2005 7:35 am    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

damn, I better stock up on my asthma meds.
_________________
"It's still all about energy!"

Schultz: I see NOTHING! I know NOTHING!

md@peakoil.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MonteQuest
Elite
Elite


Joined: Sep 06, 2004
Posts: 13460
Location: Sedona, Arizona

PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2005 10:21 am    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Already discussed at length here:

Peak Oil, Coal, and Global Warming
http://www.peakoil.com/fortopic4167.html
_________________
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
Live in Arizona? Check out: http://sustainablearizona.org and read my blog.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
dub_scratch
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude


Joined: Dec 16, 2004
Posts: 706
Location: Santa Monica, CA

PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2005 6:14 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Many pollution and noise controls on cars decrease performance & efficiency. Likewise, much of the cost in gasoline is due to emissions standards aimed at reducing toxins in the urban air. As oil becomes expensive there is going to be allot of political pressure to allow the removal of such mitigating procedures and gadgets. People will rip off their catalytic converters, EGR valves and mufflers, and urban air quality in the US will become as bad as some of the 3rd world big cities. The downslope of Hubbert's peak is going to be anything but a environmentalist dream.

That's another reason that we in America must end the car culture as a positive response to oil depletion. The costs of keeping it will increase more than just the costs of fuel.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Peak Oil Discussion All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Atom News FeedRSS 1.0 News FeedRSS 2.0 News FeedRSS Forums Feed