mos6507 wrote:Pretorian wrote:Eeeh... Loads of resources and very few people ? Sounds like a good combination to me.
What are those loads of resources you speak of? A drought-ravaged land most of the time, followed by periodic apocalyptic floods? Doesn't sound like my idea of paradise. Sure, they've got coal, but you can't eat coal. Now New Zealand, that's probably more of a lifeboat.
Perhaps there is another country out there that produces a ton of wheat , 250 pounds of beef, 80 pounds of lamb and a third of an ounce of gold per year per resident? Among many other things? Let me check... No.
Australia is USA of early 19th century, resource-wise. If NZ is any better, its only because Indonesia along with other Asia is further away.