AgentR11 wrote:Industrial civilization is vile.
Says the man from the comfort of his computer. Did you sip a latte while typing this hypocrisy?
AgentR11 wrote:Industrial civilization is vile.
AgentR11 wrote:I did not imply that I was just and noble. Thus no hypocrisy at all.
ennui2 wrote:AgentR11 wrote:Industrial civilization is vile.
Says the man from the comfort of his computer. Did you sip a latte while typing this hypocrisy?
AgentR11 wrote:I did not imply that I was just and noble. Thus no hypocrisy at all.
AgentR11 wrote:Not only do I not wish it to go away, I'm pretty sure it won't for some time. That does not preclude me from recognizing it for what it is. Industrial civilization is a vile abomination, and it provides me (and most here) great pleasure and comfort, even for those who do not wish to acknowledge it. I understand that most are desperate to see themselves as "the good guy", even as they use a 1-2 ton machine, and enough energy to feed a horde of people, to go fetch a box of cookies. I don't share that need.
Ibon wrote:Industrial civilization in not a vile abomination nor is it unsustainable at a specific population level. The great pleasures and comfort that it provides at a certain population level means we are all the "good guys" and there would be no cognitive dissonance.
Timo wrote:Ibon wrote:Industrial civilization in not a vile abomination nor is it unsustainable at a specific population level. The great pleasures and comfort that it provides at a certain population level means we are all the "good guys" and there would be no cognitive dissonance.
Ibon, i have to disagree with you on this. Humanity has not proven iteself capable of living within certain population levels in an industrial civilization.
Timo wrote:This, and other discussions consistently brings back to me that factor in the Drake Equation that posits intelligent life's abiltiy to survive its own technological advancement long enough to become indefinitely sustainable. If there is intelligent life elsewhere out in another solar system, surely the same factors apply to them, as well. Life in general is but a mere nano second in the grand history of the universe.
Ibon wrote:Timo wrote:This, and other discussions consistently brings back to me that factor in the Drake Equation that posits intelligent life's abiltiy to survive its own technological advancement long enough to become indefinitely sustainable. If there is intelligent life elsewhere out in another solar system, surely the same factors apply to them, as well. Life in general is but a mere nano second in the grand history of the universe.
Intelligent life elsewhere might not have even developed technology.
Imagine that instead of homo sapiens it was dolphins whose cerebral cortex evolved to the advanced state of reason and self awareness. In an aqueous environment with no apposing thumb to make tools there would not be any significant technology. Just intelligence. Why would advanced dolphin intelligence want to look for life in other solar systems?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests