Cid_Yama wrote:AD, I was responsible for negotiating the Conventional Forces in Europe treaty. It prevented a nuclear war until Western leaders refused to ratify the amended version. Now they just ignore it all together.
You could blame me for preventing a nuclear war in the 1980's that might have saved us from this and ushered us safely into the next Ice Age.
Unforeseeable at the time. And you wouldn't be here to blame me. So there you go.
Alfred Tennyson wrote:We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
ralfy wrote:I don't think stock market transactions have anything to do with "evolutionary conditions." If any, the former is part of activities that attempt to resist natural selection. But nature always wins in the end:
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfre ... g-collapse
And there are no "narratives" involved in this, just data.
ROCKMAN wrote:AD - Not sure what I can add: the rig count, daily production and consumption, the price of oil as well as the decline rate of the shales are what they are. Various GUESSES could be made as to potential future changes in those stats.
But what we might guess won't change the numbers as we watch them develop. If nothing significant changes in the dynamics then by 1Q 2017 I think the trends should be self evident by that point.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests