Sys1 wrote:KaiserJeep : Then what the fuck are you doing on a doomer site, moron?
You should go writing your BS on Fock News, wou will be far better welcomed than here.
Ah, typical fast crash doomer BS.
1). Everyone who doesn't agree with many of them is a "moron", data be damned. Events be damned.
2). Everyone must be here because they are a "doomer". No other reason possible, re their narrow world view.
3). I came here to learn about oil production, and secondarily more about oil economics. Funny how that could be true no matter what my doom POV is.
4). If things aren't going your way re predictions, clearly the most adult way to go about things is to ad hom people. Because we all know, looking at the data, current trends, changes in technology, etc. and re-evaluating things is impossible. /s
5). I'm a moderate, who tends toward an attitude of long term doom, given human nature and BAU growth. Yet somehow, many of the points KJ makes are at least superficially true (at least for the short to intermediate term), even as long term BAU growth and AGW makes things for the planet more precarious. (KJ isn't a fan of AGW, which I don't agree with, but somehow I can manage to screech at him like an eight year old).
...
If you can't stand varying viewpoints and a discussion of real world data, why don't YOU go to an actual doomer site? It's not like there are a lack of those.
Clearly the mods are willing to tolerate opposing viewpoints. Can you? (It doesn't mean you have to agree with them).
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.