Sarcasm is not an argument. Ghawar has been producing oil for 60 years, there are extensive records of infill drilling, increasing water cut etc and the inability of Saudi Arabia to meet it 13 mbpd day capacity claim.
And as you have been told numerous times water cut in Ghawar has been held at 30% for over 10 years according to Aramco. And even if it wasn't as both Rockman and I have pointed out numerous times water cut is meaningless as long as you can deal with extra water, there are lots of fields in the world producing at greater than 90% water cut. According to Aramco reserve numbers (which have now been audited and determined to be correct) there is still 50 or more years left at Ghawar on its own. As to capacity .....you still do not understand what spare capacity means. It means production which can be brought on stream quickly with minimal additional cost meaning the wells have been drilled and completed and tied in with all the necessary separation, gathering systems and plant capacity already in place. The Saudis have been adamant that they would not increase production unless it was necessary. Just recently the King pointed out that they look to market demand as their guidance on how much to produce, and currently they have supplied everything for which there is a buyer. So this is about the hundredth time this has been explained to you and I'm sure you will be spouting off the same nonsense in the not to distant future.
And BTW it has nothing whatsoever to do with the stupid claim made up thread regarding salt precipitation (which doesn't happen) somehow stopping all production in SA in three years time.