rockdoc123 wrote:.... classify water as a pollutant?"
Lets stop there.
Water isn't a pollutant.
I quote you saying that because you are the one who said it. Falsely ascribing it to me or implying I think that is nonsense. I don't think that or believe that. That is entirely your wacky idea.
I understand that you are arguing by analogy, but don't suggest I have anything to do with your crazy idea that water is a pollutant. Its your idea and your analogy. You could say, for instance, "How about water......why isn't it classified as a pollutant rather then trying to pretend I have anything to with your idea. Its just basic honesty for you to Take responsibility for your own ideas.
rockdoc123 wrote: As I have said there is no rationale whatsoever to claim CO2 is a pollutant. EIA may have classified it that way but you are playing the role of proud advocate for them.
I'm not "proud" to advocate for the EPA. I'm simply explaining their rationale to you. The bottom line is the EPA has classified CO2 as a pollutant.
rockdoc123 wrote: moron.
So you are indeed one of those morons who gets a little thrill out calling other people names.
How old are you, anyway? I'm getting a picture of you as being very very old, and losing it a bit and becoming emotionally childish and hence getting a little thrill out of calling people names. Do I have the right impression of you?
Cheers!