A government organization has an opinion. That's NOT "saying it all".
And, the OMB disagrees. And since the OMB has 529 employees, it's not like Trump speaks for that entire organization.
Just citing a headline and claiming it "says it all" to score political points is similar to the economic stats games Armageddon plays to try to score doom points.
Again, I'm no Trump fan, but the discussion on such issues should run a lot deeper than "tastes great" vs "less filling".
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/16/trump-a ... e-aid.htmlOMB spokeswoman Rachel Semmel, said, “We disagree with GAO’s opinion.”
“OMB uses its apportionment authority to ensure taxpayer dollars are properly spent consistent with the President’s priorities and with the law,” Semmel said.
A senior administration official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said, “GAO’s findings are a pretty clear overreach as they attempt to insert themselves into the media’s controversy of the day.”
And note that this is CNBC, which has very often been very much against Trump on many controversies, for years, and seems to try to provide at least reasonably balanced reporting overall, especially compared to much of the MSM, growing audiences via telling them what they want to hear (with, for example, FOX News and MSNBC being, IMO, among the most flagrant of MSM outlets).
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.