ROCKMAN wrote:An interestingly simple and elegant model: financing the present with future growth expectations when those expectations cannot be met. Folks can argue the timing and degrees of such failed expectations but that doesn’t change the imbalance brought on by PO. I like simple answers...really. Lots of details to debate but the core seems rather undeniable.
Roccland wrote:firestarter wrote:Market Ticker is a haven for fat ass, racist, sexist, Denninger sycophants, America relative to the rest of the world is never wrong (read: radically jingoistic), neocon windbags.
Denninger is one of the blogospheres biggest megalomaniacs. He would literally rip off your head to prove that he is correct about any opinion he harbors. His forum has been emasculated to where it is 1/100th of what it was before he summarily banned virtually everyone who disagreed with him. He's an asshole, period.
Yep - no argument there...he banned me about 9 months ago when I told him his veggie VW would not outrun PO and the ensueing die off.
That said - it is a good place to go for the play by play.
I think he is right about a depression - I think it will be a hyperinfaltionary depression or hyperstagflation but hey...what are words among friends...right?
When he banned "No Thing" for her views on a ruling elite engineering this crash to enslave the global population...he showed his true colors.
How do you unwind close to $3 trillion in bad debt, and who eats the loss? If its "the taxpayer", are you willing to pay 30-50% more for everything - forever? Oh, your wages won't go up either. If your purchasing power deteriorates by another 30-50%, will you be able to feed, clothe and keep your family and yourself warm this winter?
Yep - no argument there...he banned me about 9 months ago when I told him his veggie VW would not outrun PO and the ensueing die off.
shortonoil wrote:Roccland wrote:Yep - no argument there...he banned me about 9 months ago when I told him his veggie VW would not outrun PO and the ensueing die off.
I found TF from Eli, and after about 12 minutes I decided, “this is not a good place to post PO info. I’d be better off trying to teach the raccoon that lives in my garbage can”. Those guys are so hide bound they couldn’t be taught how to pour piss out of a boot - with the instructions written on the heal.
Its a good place to pick daily news items, not opinions!
r101958 wrote:Below is a link to one of the best articles on our debt that I have had the pleasure to read. Check it out, you won't be disappointed. I'd like to hear what you all think about it:
LINK
The inconspicuous beginnings of irredeemable debt have blossomed into a colossal edifice, a fantastic debt tower that is bound to topple upon the prevailing complacency and apathy. Actually "tower" is a misnomer. Rather, what we have is an inverted pyramid, a vast and expanding superstructure precariously balanced on a tiny and ever-shrinking gold foundation - the only asset in existence with power to reduce gross debt.
The construction has no precedent in history, and no place in theory, whether Ricardian, Walrasian, Marxian, Keynesian or Austrian. As a matter of fact, no one is analyzing the process. Research has been placed under taboo by the powers that be, lest diagnosis reveal the presence of cancer caused by irredeemability. There is no known pattern or model that would apply to its mechanism in terms of equilibrium analysis.
Two negative conclusions emerge. One is that the edifice of irredeemable debt must grow at an accelerating pace as markets for derivatives providing "insurance" to holders of debt proliferate. The insurer of debt must also be insured, as must the insurer of the insurers, and so on, ad infinitum. This is due to the fact that the risk of collapsing bond values has been created by man. In contrast, the risk of price changes of agricultural commodities are created by nature, and the futures market provides insurance, with no need to re-insure. The other conclusion is that the unwieldy size of the debt structure excludes the possibility of a normal correction: a major liquidation would dwarf the calamities of the Great Depression.
Eli wrote:You guys are spot on about KD being an asshole.
I read some where over there that Nothing was being a sock puppet that is she wasn't who she said she was, but who knows what the truth is. But your guys explanation sounds just as likely. The site is getting worse I am getting real close to being banned right now.
ABout half the stuff he said would never happen because it is illegal, has come to pass.
firestarter wrote:p.s., I think, on balance, Dante's Peak or Mr. Bill offers just as much insight on things financial as Denninger, but without all the bigoted and hurtful rhetoric.
Total receipts for the first 10 months of fiscal year 2008 were about $16 billion (or 1 percent) lower than in the same period last year. Individual income tax receipts were about $16 billion (or 2 percent) lower because of higher refunds paid to individuals. Net corporate tax receipts fell by about $42 billion (or 14 percent). Offsetting those declines were gains in social insurance receipts of $29 billion (or 4 percent) and $12 billion in other receipts, primarily Federal Reserve receipts (up $4 billion) and estate and gift taxes (up $3 billion).
Forney2008 wrote:Eli wrote:You guys are spot on about KD being an asshole.
I read some where over there that Nothing was being a sock puppet that is she wasn't who she said she was, but who knows what the truth is. But your guys explanation sounds just as likely. The site is getting worse I am getting real close to being banned right now.
ABout half the stuff he said would never happen because it is illegal, has come to pass.
Correct me if im wrong, but I thought Nothing was banned for not answering KD directly about this perfect economy system and a reset of this system of money we are in now??
But yeah, KD has one of the largest egos on planet Earth. Funny, like you said, many of the same people he "banned" as moonbats for saying stuff b4 are now proven correct since our government has become just that desperate to delay this crisis.
firestarter wrote:Denninger is a lunatic. He is now pining for the U.S. to aggressively respond to Russia, even so much as suggesting us using the nuclear option. He's banning like mad today, those who want to take a more measured/diplomatic approach to her (Russia's) actions. He thinks Russia should just accept a NATO led perimeter because it will lead to peace not war. But when a poster suggested the double standard, (see Monroe Doctrine as was expressed with the Cuban Missile crisis), the dipshit Denninger merely ignored the comparison and went on goading the anti empire crowd at his venue . He is the epitome of a neocon, warmongering zealot. I'm sure he would have no qualms about removing your life, liberty or freedom in the cause of promoting the world according to Denninger. Authoritarian folks of his ilk scare the crap out of me. Sadly I think they are the majority report in America today. Betcha he thinks Orwell was merely an unpatriotic crank.
p.s., I think, on balance, Dante's Peak or Mr. Bill offers just as much insight on things financial as Denninger, but without all the bigoted and hurtful rhetoric.
firestarter wrote:Forney2008 wrote:Eli wrote:You guys are spot on about KD being an asshole.
I read some where over there that Nothing was being a sock puppet that is she wasn't who she said she was, but who knows what the truth is. But your guys explanation sounds just as likely. The site is getting worse I am getting real close to being banned right now.
ABout half the stuff he said would never happen because it is illegal, has come to pass.
Correct me if im wrong, but I thought Nothing was banned for not answering KD directly about this perfect economy system and a reset of this system of money we are in now??
But yeah, KD has one of the largest egos on planet Earth. Funny, like you said, many of the same people he "banned" as moonbats for saying stuff b4 are now proven correct since our government has become just that desperate to delay this crisis.
He allowed the N word in all its nasty sense to be uttered without censure up until today. All of a sudden it can't be spoken at his forum unless it's done in the golden paywalled bar. The reason he changed this bigoted policy today is because someone opined that Israel was behind much of the turmoil in the region, including the Russian situation. He called it JOO baiting (his words) and it's not permissible. When the fella whom he blasted in his Ticker the am, Allclear, said Denninger was operating under a gross double standard because he allowed the N word to be used with impunity for over a year, Denninger told him (Allclear) that any reference to the N word would get him banned from the forum. I wonder if it might have something to do with Denninger being on Glenn Beck's show tomorrow? So much for being a stand up guy. What a floor flushing phony.
threadbear wrote:
I suppose this Denninger guy, like many such nuts, considers himself a Libertarian!
nobodypanic wrote:threadbear wrote:
I suppose this Denninger guy, like many such nuts, considers himself a Libertarian!
your insight is top notch, sir.
threadbear wrote:nobodypanic wrote:threadbear wrote:
I suppose this Denninger guy, like many such nuts, considers himself a Libertarian!
your insight is top notch, sir.
It's all about personal freedom; for their own persons!
Scratch many right wing "libertarians" and you'll find self interested, greedy consumers and war pigs. Oh, and that's Ma'am, but thanks for compliment anyway!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests