DantesPeak wrote:Mish seems to be very concerned about bank reserves created by the Fed just sitting there. He can't see the forest for the trees here.
Let's be very, very clear - that new Fed money is not just sitting there. That extra $1 trillion in new fiat money that the banks keep in reserve was returned to the Fed and used to buy $1 trillion in Treasuries and other investments. The Treasury has already spent $1 trillion which has already gone into the economy.
Historically it takes up to two years for the banking system to fully utilize free reserves. The multiplier effect will create trillions of more dollars later on. In addition, the government has assumed trillions in unrealized off-balance sheet banking losses through Fannie and Freddie already. Effectively the US government has created just as much in new credit there to offset the credit collapse Mish keeps talking about. The government has already guaranteed $12 trillion in credit.
If someone thinks I am wrong about the Fed, and Mish is right, please explain to me how the $1 trillion that the US government spent was just imaginary, and the trillions in new credit the US has committed to the mortgage sector really has no effect on the economy.
Inflation camp == plus 1
Deflation camp == zero