I keep seeing current / recent high prices as the implied proof of peak oil in these posts.
Prices are a function of supply AND demand.
I still think the big issue is not current or near term supply but the likely HUGE run-up in relatively near term demand by the roughly 3 billion people in the emerging markets that nearly ALL aspire to have a family car and travel. China and India and the $2500 Nano as the symbol of the cheap family car of choice are the obvious big-hitter culprits cited by the Economist over the past year or so.
I'm constantly amazed by the financial analysts who keep insisting that oil is way overpriced and that it MUST crash in coming months, as there is lots of current supply (ships full of oil sitting in harbors is commonly cited as "proof" of this.).
Well, yeah, if you have the attention span of a GNAT, I guess that makes sense. However, with things like long term oil futures contracts, long term storage costs which can be estimated, and long term supply/demand that can be forecast based on various assumptions, it would seem that the "overpriced" oil market seems to basically disagree with these folks, as many "speculators" remain long and strong on their oil forecast/positions.
In my mind, we may be a LONG way from (geologically caused) peak oil. However, we are NOT a long way from chronically very EXPENSIVE oil (relative to what the global economy can tolerate). The cost may force us to use other things and to conserve a lot. If this results in us hitting a (behaviorally based) oil peak soon, that would seem to be a GOOD thing, at least in the long run.